Abstract
Epistemology has become a crucial issue for feminism and feminism has become a crucial issue for epistemology. Feminist epistemologists, in common with many other contemporary thinkers, no longer regard knowledge as a neutral transparent reflection of an independently ordered reality with truth and falsity established by transcendent procedures of rational assessment. Rather most accept that all knowledge is situated knowledge, reflecting the position of the knowledge producer at a certain historical moment in a given material and cultural context. Interconnectedly feminism, along with other movements, has recognised the links between knowledge and power. The legitimisation of knowledge claims is intimately tied to networks of power relations. This recognition has moved epistemological issues into the forefront of contemporary culture. If we cannot distinguish between good and bad knowledge claims by the application of neutral and transcendent criteria how are we to address traditional epistemological concerns regarding justification and the distinction between genuine knowledge and what merely passes for it? This is not of only philosophical interest, for feminism has a commitment to social change; it wishes to establish the legitimacy of its critiques of the existing social order and devise effective strategies for change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcoff, L. and E. Potter (ed.): 1993, Feminist Epistemologies, Routledge, London and N Y
Bar On, Bat—Ami: 1993, `Marginality and Epistemic Privilege’, in Alcoff and Potter 1993.
Belenky, M., B. M. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger and J. M. Tarule: 1986, Womens Ways of Knowing; The Development of Self, Voice and Mind, Basic Books, New York.
Bleier, R.:1983, Science and Gender,Pergamon, Elmsford, New York.
Bleier, R. (ed.): 1988, Feminist Approaches to Science, Pergamon, New York.
Code, L.: 1991, What Can She Know: Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Dalmiya, V. and L. Alcoff: 1993, `Are `Old Wives Tales’ Justified?’, in Alcoff and Potter (eds.).
Feyerabend, P.: 1975, Against Method, Verso, London.
Fox-Keller, E.: 1985, Reflections on Gender and Science, Yale Univeristy Press, New Haven CT.
Fox-Keller, E.: 1992, Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender and Science, Routledge, New York and London.
Fox-Keller, E. and H. Longino (eds.): 1996, Feminism and Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
Gadamer, H.G.: 1975, Truth and Method, Sheed and Ward, London.
Gadamer, H.G.: 1976, Philosophical Hermeneutics, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development,Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.
Gonzalez, A. S.: 2000, Practical Knowledge, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hull.
Haraway, D.: 1978, `Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic,’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 4/1, reprinted in E. Fox Keller and H. Longino (ed.) 1996, Feminism and Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Haraway, D.: 1989, Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science, Routledge, New York.
Haraway, D.: 1991a, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, Free Association, London.
Haraway, D.: 1991b, `Cyborgs at Large; Interview with Donna Haraway’, in C. Penley and A. Ross (eds.), Technoculture, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Harding, S.: 1986, The Science Question in Feminism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.
Harding, S.: 1991, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?, Open Univerisity Press, Milton Keynes.
Harding, S. (ed.): 1993, The “Racial” Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Hartsock, N.: 1983, `The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism’, in S. Harding and M. Hintikka (eds.), Discovering Reality, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1977, Phenomenology of Spirit, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
Jagger, A.: 1983, Feminist Politics and Human Nature, Harvester, Sussex.
Kuhn, T.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lennon, K.: 1995, `Gender and Knowledge’, Journal of Gender Studies, Vol 4 No2, 33–145.
Lennon, K.: 1997 `Reply to Helen Longino’, PASS LXXI, 37–55.
Lennon, K. and M. Whitford (eds.): 1994, Knowing the Difference, Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology, Routledge, London and New York.
Lukacs, G.: 1971, History and Class Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.
Lewontin, R., S. Rose and L. Kamin: 1984, Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature, Penguin, London and New York.
Lloyd, G.: 1984, The Man of Reason: `Male’ and `Female’ in Western Philosophy, Methven, London.
Longino, H.: 1990, Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
Longino, H.: 1993, `Subjects, Power and Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophies of Science’, in Alcoff and Potter 1993.
Longino, H.: 1994, ‘In Search of Feminist Epistemology’, The Monist 77, no 4, 472–485.
Longino, H.: 1997, `Feminist Epistemology as Local Epistemology’, PASS, LXXI, 19–37.
Martin, E.: 1991, `The Egg and Sperm’, Signs; Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16/3, reprinted in E. Fox Keller and H. Longino (eds.), 1996, Feminism and Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Narayan, U.: 1997, Dislocating Culture, Routledge, London and New York.
Nelson, L. H.: 1990, Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Nelson, L. H.: 1993, `A Question of Evidence’, Hypatia, vol 8, no 2.
Nicholson, L. J.: 1990, Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, New York and London.
Oudshoorn, N.: 1994, Beyond the Natural Body, Routledge, London and New York. Parsons, T.: 1951, The Social System, The Free Press, Glencoe Ill.
Pitt, D.: 1988, `Women and Heart Disease’, paper to 1998 Women’s Studies Network Conference, Hull, UK.
Quine, W.: 1953, `Two Dogma’s of Empiricism’, in From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.
Scheman, N.: 1993, Engenderings, Routledge, London and New York.
Seller, A.: 1994, A.: 1994, `Should the Feminist Philosopher Stay at Home’, in Lennon and Whitford 1994.
Smith, D.: 1987, The Everyday World as Problematic, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Spelman, E.: 1988, Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought, Beacon Press, Boston.
Strickland, S.: 1993, Objectivity Perspectivity and Difference, Ph.D. University of Hull 1994.
Stickland, S.: 1994, S.: 1994, `Feminism Postmodernism and Difference’, in Lennon and Whitford 1994.
Whitford, M.: 1996, `Doing Feminist Research - Making Links’, Womens Philosophy Review Issue no.16, 33–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lennon, K. (2004). Feminist Epistemology. In: Niiniluoto, I., Sintonen, M., Woleński, J. (eds) Handbook of Epistemology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-6969-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-1986-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive