Jump to content

Action theory (philosophy): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎See also: added wikilink
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: chapter-url. Removed or converted URL. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Ontology | #UCB_Category 74/130
(20 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Theory of the processes causing willful human bodily movements}}
{{no footnotes|date=February 2018}}
{{more footnotes|date=February 2018}}


'''Action theory''' (or '''theory of action''') is an area in [[philosophy]] concerned with [[Theory|theories]] about the processes [[Causality|causing]] [[Will (philosophy)|willful]] [[Motor system|human bodily movements]] of a more or less complex kind. This [[List of academic disciplines|area of thought]] involves [[epistemology]], [[ethics]], [[metaphysics]], [[jurisprudence]], and [[philosophy of mind]], and has attracted the strong interest of philosophers ever since [[Aristotle]]'s ''[[Nicomachean Ethics]]'' (Third Book). With the advent of [[psychology]] and later [[neuroscience]], many theories of action are now subject to [[empirical test]]ing.
'''Action theory''' (or '''theory of action''') is an area in [[philosophy]] concerned with [[Theory|theories]] about the processes [[Causality|causing]] [[Will (philosophy)|willful]] [[Motor system|human bodily movements]] of a more or less complex kind. This [[List of academic disciplines|area of thought]] involves [[epistemology]], [[ethics]], [[metaphysics]], [[jurisprudence]], and [[philosophy of mind]], and has attracted the strong interest of philosophers ever since [[Aristotle]]'s ''[[Nicomachean Ethics]]'' (Third Book). With the advent of [[psychology]] and later [[neuroscience]], many theories of action are now subject to [[empirical test]]ing.


Philosophical action theory, or the '''philosophy of action''', should not be confused with [[sociological]] theories of [[social action]], such as the [[Action theory (sociology)|action theory]] established by [[Talcott Parsons]]. Nor should it be confused with [[activity theory]].
Philosophical action theory, or the '''philosophy of action''', should not be confused with [[sociological]] theories of [[social action]], such as the [[Action theory (sociology)|action theory]] established by [[Talcott Parsons]]. Nor should it be confused with [[activity theory]].

{{Quote box
|quote =What is left over if I subtract the fact that my arm goes up from the fact that I raise my arm?
|source =[[Ludwig Wittgenstein]], ''[[Philosophical Investigations]]'' §621
|width =auto
|align =right
}}


== Overview ==
== Overview ==
Basic action theory typically describes [[action (philosophy)|action]] as behavior caused by an ''agent'' in a particular ''situation''. The agent's ''desires'' and ''beliefs'' (e.g. my wanting a glass of water and believing that the clear liquid in the cup in front of me is water) lead to bodily behavior (e.g. reaching over for the glass). In the simple theory (see [[Donald Davidson (philosopher)|Donald Davidson]]), the desire and belief jointly cause the action. [[Michael Bratman]] has raised problems for such a view and argued that we should take the concept of intention as basic and not analyzable into beliefs and desires.
Basic action theory typically describes [[action (philosophy)|action]] as intentional behavior caused by an ''agent'' in a particular ''situation''.<ref name="Funke">{{cite book |last1=Funke |first1=Joachim |editor-last1= Meusburger |editor-first1= P. |editor-last2= Werlen |editor-first2= B. |editor-last3= Suarsana |editor-first3= L. |title=Knowledge and Action |date=2017 |publisher=Springer International Publishing |isbn=978-3-319-44588-5 |pages=99–111 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-44588-5_6 |language=en |chapter=How Much Knowledge Is Necessary for Action? |series=Knowledge and Space |volume=9 |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-44588-5_6 }}</ref> The agent's ''desires'' and ''beliefs'' (e.g. my wanting a glass of water and believing that the clear liquid in the cup in front of me is water) lead to bodily behavior (e.g. reaching across for the glass). In the simple theory (see [[Donald Davidson (philosopher)|Donald Davidson]]), the desire and belief jointly cause the action. [[Michael Bratman]] has raised problems for such a view and argued that we should take the concept of intention as basic and not analyzable into beliefs and desires.

Aristotle held that a thorough explanation must give an account of both the [[efficient cause]], the agent, and the [[Telos|final cause]], the intention.


In some theories a desire plus a belief about the means of satisfying that desire are always what is behind an action. Agents aim, in acting, to maximize the satisfaction of their desires. Such a theory of prospective [[rationality]] underlies much of [[economics]] and other [[social science]]s within the more sophisticated framework of [[rational choice]]. However, many theories of action argue that rationality extends far beyond calculating the best means to achieve one's ends. For instance, a belief that I ought to do X, in some theories, can directly cause me to do X without my having to want to do X (i.e. have a desire to do X). Rationality, in such theories, also involves responding correctly to the reasons an agent perceives, not just acting on wants.
In some theories a desire plus a belief about the means of satisfying that desire are always what is behind an action. Agents aim, in acting, to maximize the satisfaction of their desires. Such a theory of prospective [[rationality]] underlies much of [[economics]] and other [[social science]]s within the more sophisticated framework of [[rational choice]]. However, many theories of action argue that rationality extends far beyond calculating the best means to achieve one's ends. For instance, a belief that I ought to do X, in some theories, can directly cause me to do X without my having to want to do X (i.e. have a desire to do X). Rationality, in such theories, also involves responding correctly to the reasons an agent perceives, not just acting on wants.
Line 20: Line 16:


Conceptual discussions also revolve around a precise definition of [[Action (philosophy)|action]] in philosophy. Scholars may disagree on which bodily movements fall under this category, e.g. whether thinking should be analysed as action, and how complex actions involving several steps to be taken and diverse intended consequences are to be summarised or decomposed.
Conceptual discussions also revolve around a precise definition of [[Action (philosophy)|action]] in philosophy. Scholars may disagree on which bodily movements fall under this category, e.g. whether thinking should be analysed as action, and how complex actions involving several steps to be taken and diverse intended consequences are to be summarised or decomposed.

== Scholars ==
{{Div col|colwidth=18em}}
* [[G. E. M. Anscombe]]
* [[Thomas Aquinas]]
* [[Hannah Arendt]]
* [[Aristotle]]
* [[Robert Audi]]
* [[Jonathan Bennett (philosopher)|Jonathan Bennett]]
* [[Maurice Blondel]]
* [[Michael Bratman]]
* [[Hector-Neri Castañeda]]
* [[David Charles (philosopher)|David Charles]]
* [[August Cieszkowski]]
* [[Michel Crozier]]
* [[Jonathan Dancy]]
* [[Donald Davidson (philosopher)|Donald Davidson]]
* [[Daniel Dennett]]
* [[William H. Dray]]
* [[Fred Dretske]]
* [[Ignacio Ellacuría]]
* [[John Martin Fischer]]
* [[Harry Frankfurt]]
* [[Arnold Gehlen]]
* [[Carl Ginet]]
* [[Alvin I. Goldman]]
* [[Jürgen Habermas]]
* [[Sam Harris]]
* [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]]
* [[Carl Hempel]]
* [[Jennifer Hornsby]]
* [[Rosalind Hursthouse]]
* [[David Hume]]
* [[John Hyman (philosopher)|John Hyman]]
* [[Hans Joas]]
* [[Robert Kane (philosopher)|Robert Kane]]
* [[Anthony Kenny]]
* [[Jaegwon Kim]]
* [[Christine Korsgaard]]
* [[Tadeusz Kotarbiński]]
* [[Loet Leydesdorff]]
* [[John McDowell]]
* [[Alfred R. Mele]]
* [[Elijah Millgram]]
* [[Ludwig von Mises]]
* [[Thomas Nagel]]
* [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]
* [[Lucy O'Brien]]
* [[Talcott Parsons]]
* [[Derk Pereboom (philosopher)]]
* [[Juan Antonio Pérez López]]
* [[Brian O'Shaughnessy (philosopher)|Brian O'Shaughnessy]]
* [[Joseph Raz]]
* [[Thomas Reid]]
* [[Raymond Reiter]]
* [[Paul Ricoeur]]
* [[Alfred Schütz]]
* [[Constantine Sandis]]
* [[John Searle]]
* [[Scott Sehon]]
* [[Wilfrid Sellars]]
* [[Michael A. Smith (philosopher)|Michael Smith]]
* [[Baruch Spinoza]]
* [[Galen Strawson]]
* [[Charles Taylor (philosopher)|Charles Taylor]]
* [[Richard Taylor (philosopher)|Richard Taylor]]
* [[Irving Thalberg]]
* [[Judith Jarvis Thomson]]
* [[David Velleman]]
* [[Candace Vogler]]
* [[Georg Henrik von Wright]]
* [[R. Jay Wallace]]
* [[Susan Wolf]]
* [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]]
* [[Max Weber]]
* [[Xavier Zubiri]]
{{colend}}


==See also==
==See also==
Line 102: Line 21:
* [[Free will]]
* [[Free will]]
* {{section link|Humeanism#Theory of action}}
* {{section link|Humeanism#Theory of action}}
*[[Cybernetics]]
<!--

==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}-->
{{reflist}}


== Further reading ==
== Further reading ==
Line 110: Line 30:
* G. E. M. Anscombe (1957). ''Intention'', Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
* G. E. M. Anscombe (1957). ''Intention'', Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
* James Sommerville (1968). ''Total Commitment, Blondel's L'Action'', Corpus Books.
* James Sommerville (1968). ''Total Commitment, Blondel's L'Action'', Corpus Books.
* Michel Crozier, & Erhard Friedberg (1980). ''Actors and Systems'' (Chicago: [University of Chicago Press].
* Michel Crozier, & Erhard Friedberg (1980). ''Actors and Systems'' Chicago: [University of Chicago Press].
* Donald Davidson (1980). ''Essays on Actions and Events'', Clarendon Press, Oxford.
* Donald Davidson (1980). ''Essays on Actions and Events'', Clarendon Press, Oxford.
* Jonathan Dancy & Constantine Sandis (eds.) (2015). ''Philosophy of Action: An Anthology'', Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
* Jonathan Dancy & Constantine Sandis (eds.) (2015). ''Philosophy of Action: An Anthology'', Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
Line 125: Line 45:
* Constantine Sandis (ed.) (2019). ''Philosophy of Action from Suarez to Anscombe'', London, Routledge.
* Constantine Sandis (ed.) (2019). ''Philosophy of Action from Suarez to Anscombe'', London, Routledge.
* Michael Thompson (2012). ''Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought'', Boston, MA, Harvard University Press.
* Michael Thompson (2012). ''Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought'', Boston, MA, Harvard University Press.
* Lawrence H. Davis (1979). ''Theory of Action'', Prentice-Hall, (Foundations of Philosophy Series), Englewood Cliffs, NJ.


==External links==
==External links==
Line 137: Line 58:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Action Theory}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Action Theory}}
[[Category:Action (philosophy)|*]]
[[Category:Action (philosophy)|*]]
[[Category:Concepts in epistemology]]
[[Category:Concepts in ethics]]
[[Category:Concepts in metaphilosophy]]
[[Category:Concepts in metaphysics]]
[[Category:Concepts in the philosophy of mind]]
[[Category:Concepts in the philosophy of science]]
[[Category:Free will]]
[[Category:Free will]]
[[Category:Metaphysical theories]]
[[Category:Subfields of metaphysics]]
[[Category:Metaphysics of mind]]
[[Category:Metaphysics of mind]]
[[Category:Neuroscience]]
[[Category:Neuroscience]]
[[Category:Ontology]]
[[Category:Ontology]]
[[Category:Theory of mind]]
[[Category:Epistemological theories]]

Revision as of 21:51, 9 January 2024

Action theory (or theory of action) is an area in philosophy concerned with theories about the processes causing willful human bodily movements of a more or less complex kind. This area of thought involves epistemology, ethics, metaphysics, jurisprudence, and philosophy of mind, and has attracted the strong interest of philosophers ever since Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (Third Book). With the advent of psychology and later neuroscience, many theories of action are now subject to empirical testing.

Philosophical action theory, or the philosophy of action, should not be confused with sociological theories of social action, such as the action theory established by Talcott Parsons. Nor should it be confused with activity theory.

Overview

Basic action theory typically describes action as intentional behavior caused by an agent in a particular situation.[1] The agent's desires and beliefs (e.g. my wanting a glass of water and believing that the clear liquid in the cup in front of me is water) lead to bodily behavior (e.g. reaching across for the glass). In the simple theory (see Donald Davidson), the desire and belief jointly cause the action. Michael Bratman has raised problems for such a view and argued that we should take the concept of intention as basic and not analyzable into beliefs and desires.

Aristotle held that a thorough explanation must give an account of both the efficient cause, the agent, and the final cause, the intention.

In some theories a desire plus a belief about the means of satisfying that desire are always what is behind an action. Agents aim, in acting, to maximize the satisfaction of their desires. Such a theory of prospective rationality underlies much of economics and other social sciences within the more sophisticated framework of rational choice. However, many theories of action argue that rationality extends far beyond calculating the best means to achieve one's ends. For instance, a belief that I ought to do X, in some theories, can directly cause me to do X without my having to want to do X (i.e. have a desire to do X). Rationality, in such theories, also involves responding correctly to the reasons an agent perceives, not just acting on wants.

While action theorists generally employ the language of causality in their theories of what the nature of action is, the issue of what causal determination comes to has been central to controversies about the nature of free will.

Conceptual discussions also revolve around a precise definition of action in philosophy. Scholars may disagree on which bodily movements fall under this category, e.g. whether thinking should be analysed as action, and how complex actions involving several steps to be taken and diverse intended consequences are to be summarised or decomposed.

See also

References

  1. ^ Funke, Joachim (2017). "How Much Knowledge Is Necessary for Action?". In Meusburger, P.; Werlen, B.; Suarsana, L. (eds.). Knowledge and Action. Knowledge and Space. Vol. 9. Springer International Publishing. pp. 99–111. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44588-5_6. ISBN 978-3-319-44588-5.

Further reading

  • Maurice Blondel (1893). L'Action - Essai d'une critique de la vie et d'une science de la pratique
  • G. E. M. Anscombe (1957). Intention, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  • James Sommerville (1968). Total Commitment, Blondel's L'Action, Corpus Books.
  • Michel Crozier, & Erhard Friedberg (1980). Actors and Systems Chicago: [University of Chicago Press].
  • Donald Davidson (1980). Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Jonathan Dancy & Constantine Sandis (eds.) (2015). Philosophy of Action: An Anthology, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Jennifer Hornsby (1980). Actions, Routledge, London.
  • Lilian O'Brien (2014). Philosophy of Action, Palgrave, Basingstoke.
  • Christine Korsgaard (2008). The Constitution of Agency, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Alfred R. Mele (ed.) (1997). The Philosophy of Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • John Hyman & Helen Steward (eds.) (2004). Agency and Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Anton Leist (ed.) (2007). Action in Context, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
  • Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.) (2010). A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Sarah Paul (2020). The Philosophy of Action: A Contemporary Introduction, London, Routledge.
  • Peter Šajda et al. (eds.) (2012). Affectivity, Agency and Intersubjectivity, L'Harmattan, Paris.
  • Constantine Sandis (ed.) (2009). New Essays on the Explanation of Action, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
  • Constantine Sandis (ed.) (2019). Philosophy of Action from Suarez to Anscombe, London, Routledge.
  • Michael Thompson (2012). Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought, Boston, MA, Harvard University Press.
  • Lawrence H. Davis (1979). Theory of Action, Prentice-Hall, (Foundations of Philosophy Series), Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

External links