Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)


GLOBAL FOUCAULT Divergences and Agreements in Italian Thought

Lisbon, 6-7 June 2024 (in person & online)

Orgs.: Gianfranco FERRARO, Greg BIRD, Giovanbattista TUSA

Universidade Aberta, Centro de Estudos Globais – Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian
Zoom: https://videoconf-colibri.zoom.us/j/91692099038

More info: https://foucault40.info/lisboa | https://globalfoucault.wordpress.com/
Contact: globalfoucault@gmail.com

n the occasion of the 40th anniversary of Foucault’s death, the Differenças italianas Research Group of the Open University of Lisbon will host a symposium on the relationship between Foucault and Italian Thought. It is undisputed that Foucault had a decisive impact on Italian Thought, but the central role of Italian Thought in the worldwide reception of Foucault since his death has not been sufficiently acknowledged. Books by prominent Italian philosophers such as Homo Sacer, Technologies of Gender, Empire, and Bíos have highlighted certain currents in Foucault’s scholarship and shaped its interpretation worldwide. For example, where would biopolitical Thought, gender theory, or dispositif theory be today without Italian interlocutors?

Our event invites contemporary Italian thinkers to reflect on the role Italian Thought has played not only in the emergence of new Foucauldian scholarship, but also in shaping the global reception of his scholarship. Our participants will be selected from the Italian Thought Network. We ask our participants to go beyond the typical scholarly exegetical accounts of how a particular theorist has interpreted Foucault. Instead, we ask our participants to explore how Italian Theory has produced new global lines of Foucauldian scholarship. What is the impact of contemporary Italian philosophy on the global reception of Foucault?

PROGRAMME

6 de Junho 2024 / 6 June 2024
Salão Nobre da Universidade Aberta

9h30: Acolhimento institucional do Centro de Estudos Globais e da Universidade Aberta / Institutional welcome from the Center for Global Studies and the Open University: Gianfranco Ferraro

Saudações do Diretor do Instituto italiano de Cultura / Greetings from the Director of the Italian Cultural Institute: dr. Stefano Scaramuzzino

Saudações do co-coordenador do Laboratório “Diferenças italianas” do CEG / Greetings from the co-coordinator of the “Italian Differences” Laboratory of the CEG: Gabriele De Angelis
Abertura oficial do Colóquio da parte do comité organizativo / Official opening of the Colloquium by the organizing committee: Gianfranco Ferraro, Greg Bird e Giovanbattista Tusa

9h50 – 11h50: Biopolítica e pensamento italiano / Biopolitics and Italian Thought
Alfonso Galindo Hervás, Biopolitica. Istituzione. Variazioni foucaultiane di Roberto Esposito / Biopolitics. Institution. Foucaultian Variations by Roberto Esposito

Elettra Stimilli, Biopolitica e pensiero italiano / Biopolitics and Italian Thought

Ernani Chaves, Pasolini, pensador da biopolitica / Pasolini, thinker of Biopolitics

Chair: Marta Faustino

11h50: Coffee break

12h00 – 13h30: À volta do Foucault italiano / About the Italian Foucault

Daniela Calabrò, Le “vite infami” e le “attenzioni del potere”. Il rapporto tra politica e vita in Foucault ed Esposito / The “infamous lives” and the “attentions of power”. The relationship between politics and life in Foucault and Esposito

Sebastián Rodriguez Cardenas, El otro, el mismo: Foucault y Agamben entre dispositif y dispositivo / The other, the same: Foucault and Agamben between dispositif and dispositivo

Chair: Gabriele De Angelis

15h30 – 17h00: Polaridades foucaultianas / Foucauldian polarities

Costanza Serratore, Nietzsche in Foucault. La bipolarità della biopolitica nella ricezione italiana / Nietzsche in Foucault. The bipolarity of biopolitics in Italian reception

Oswaldo Giacoia jr., Exceptio e Bando: Alcance e Limites da Biopolítica / Exceptio and Bando: Scope and Limits of Biopolitics

Chair: Irene Viparelli

7 de Junho 2024 / 7 June 2024
Salão Nobre da Universidade Aberta

9h30 – 11h30: Arqueologias foucaultianas / Foucauldian Archaeologies
Sajjad Lohi, Foucault, l’Iran, l’Italia /Foucault, Iran, Italy

Giulio Goria, The Atlas of Knowledge: Archaeology from an Italian Debate at the End of the Sixties

Gianfranco Ferraro, Conversioni italiane: per un’archeologia del “pensiero vivente” / Italian conversions: Towards an archaeology of the “living Thought”

Chair: Enrica Lisciani Petrini

11h30: Coffee break

11h30 – 13h30: Pensamento dispositivo / Dispositive Thought
Dario Gentili, Governamentalità socialista: sviluppi e differenze nell’Italian Thought a partire da uno spunto di Foucault / Socialist governmentality: developments and differences in Italian Thought starting from Foucault’s remark

Giovanbattista Tusa, I mostri di Foucault. Riflessioni sul dispositif / Foucault’s monsters. Reflections on the dispositif

Greg Bird, What is a dispositif, according to Esposito?
Chair: Arianna Mencaroni

7 de Junho 2024 / 7th June 2024
Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian | Auditorium 3
Simpósio Temático com Roberto Esposito

16h: Roberto Esposito: “Oltre la biopolítica” / “Beyond he Biopolitics”
Introduz e modera / Introduction and moderation by: Gianfranco Ferraro (CEG – Universidade Aberta de Lisboa)

Comentário crítico / critical commentary by: Guilherme d’Oliveira Martins (Administrador Executivo da Fundação Gulbenkian / Executive Trustee of the Gulbenkian Foundation)

Paul Muldoon, The Penitent State Exposure, Mourning and the Biopolitics of National Healing, Oxford University Press, 2023

This book asks a deceptively simple question: what are states actually doing when they do penance for past injustices? Why are these penitential gestures – especially the gesture of apology – becoming so ubiquitous and what implications do they carry for the way power is exercised? Drawing on the work of Schmitt, Foucault and Agamben, the book argues that there is more at stake in sovereign acts of repentance and redress than either the recognition of the victims or the legitimacy of the state. Driven, it suggests, by an interest in ‘healing’, such acts testify to a new biopolitical raison d’état in which the management of trauma emerges as a critical expression of attempts to regulate the life of the population. The Penitent State seeks to show that the key issue created by the ‘age of apology’ is not whether sovereign acts of repentance and redress are sincere or insincere, but whether the political measures licensed in the name of healing deserve to be regarded as either restorative or just.

  • Challenges conventional interpretations of sovereign acts of repentance and redress as ethical gestures
  • Situates the ‘age of apology’ within a broader societal movement towards the biopolitical regulation of psychic trauma
  • Provides a forensic examination of the way three of the key institutions of restorative justice – public memorials, political apologies, truth commissions – function as instruments of trauma management and national healing
  • Explores the political institution of Greek tragedy as an alternative, more critical, vehicle for social catharsis and political truth telling

Hofmeyr, A.B.
A critical consideration of Foucault’s conceptualisation of morality
(2024) Verbum et Ecclesia, 45 (1), art. no. a2830, .

DOI: 10.4102/ve.v45i1.2830

Abstract
The background of this research is the status and significance of an ethics of care of the self in the history of morality. I followed the following methodology: I attempted to come to nuanced, critical understanding of the Foucault’s conceptualisation of morality in Volumes II and III of The History of Sexuality. In the ‘Ancients’, Foucault uncovered an ‘ethics-oriented’ as opposed to a ‘code-oriented’ morality in which the emphasis shifted to how an individual was supposed to constitute himself as an ethical subject of his own action without denying the importance of either the moral code or the actual behaviour of people. The main question was whether care of the self-sufficiently regulated an individual’s conduct towards others to prevent the self from lapsing into narcissism, substituting a generous responsiveness towards the other for a means-end rationale. I put this line of critique to test by confronting Foucault’s care of the self with Levinas’s primordial responsibility towards the other and put forward a case for the indispensability of aesthetics for ethics. In conclusion, I defended the claim that care of the self does indeed foster other responsiveness. Intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary implications: Foucault’s ethics, understood as an ‘aesthetics of existence’ has profound intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary implications, as it challenges traditional ethical normative ethical theories and engages with various fields of philosophy, social sciences and humanities. Interdisciplinary fields greatly influenced by Foucault’s ethics include: psychology, literary, cultural, gender and sexuality studies, medical ethics, anthropology and history, among others. © 2024. The Author. Licensee: AOSIS.

Author Keywords

aesthetics of existence; care of the self; ethics; Foucault; Levinas; morality; responsibility for the other

Carlo, Andrea di. “The Problem of Toleration: Tacitus, Foucault and Governmentality.” History of European Ideas, (2024), 1–16.
doi:10.1080/01916599.2024.2346031

ABSTRACT
This article proposes a novel interpretation of Montaigne’s and Bayle’s comments on Tacitus. My contention is that their Tacitism is a Foucauldian discourse on toleration. Toleration is an example of governmentality, a strategy to govern a population, not a genuine call for religious diversity. This novel reading applies to Michel de Montaigne’s Essays and Pierre Bayle’s Various Thoughts on the Occasion of a Comet and his Historical and Critical Dictionary. Montaigne’s essay On the Useful and the Honourable, he shows that there is a difference between his public and private persona. The author discusses ideas of toleration in a Tacitist style. This happens in his essay Something Lacking in Our Civil Administrations, where the author laments the death of Sebastian Castalio and, indirectly, he supports his commitment to religious pluralism. As I will show, Montaigne embraces a Gallican belief system, which is more conciliatory. Bayle a century later, discusses the same issues. In his Various Thoughts, he makes a case for toleration as a tool to manage a population. Ultimately, it will be clear how this plea for toleration is not a product of the Enlightenment, but it is rather a discourse to achieve societal compliance.

KEYWORDS:
Tacitus Tacitism Montaigne Bayle Foucault

PDF of program and other details

Foucault and Marx Ambivalences, Legacies, and Future Struggles
International Symposium
18–19 October 2024
University of Vienna, Austria

The symposium aims to explore the tense relationship between Foucault and Marx and, on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of Foucault’s death in 2024, to put it into perspective with regard to Foucault’s intellectual legacy. Foucault is generally perceived as a harsh critic of Marxism, both in terms of its analytical possibilities and political dangers. This contrasts strongly not only with Foucault’s repeated emphasis on the centrality of Marx, but also with clear theoretical parallels. The subject of the symposium is therefore the question of how this ambivalence is to be understood, what it means for possible continuations of the Foucauldian project and to what extent the Foucault-Marx connection can be made fruitful for current and future questions.

The event takes place at the Department of Philosophy of the University of Vienna and is part of the World Congress Foucault: 40 years after which is coordinating over 50 events worldwide to mark the 40th anniversary of Foucault’s death in 2024.

Leonard, M.
The Power of Oedipus: Michel Foucault with Hannah Arendt
(2023) Arethusa, 56 (3), pp. 393-412.

DOI: 10.1353/are.2023.a917343

Abstract

It has become increasingly common to draw connections between Michel Foucault and Hannah Arendt: there are strong continuities between their respective theories of power, and Foucault and Arendt share an account of modernity and of the entry of biological life into the political sphere. Both thinkers are also immersed in the texts of antiquity and place an analysis of the ancient world at the heart of their thinking about the modern condition. This article explores how their different accounts of Oedipus as a political figure reveal their preoccupations with questions of power and political subjectivity. © 2023 by Johns Hopkins University Press.

Stypinska, D.
Pastorate Digitalized: Social Media and (De)Subjectification
(2024) Theory, Culture and Society, .

DOI: 10.1177/02632764231216896

Abstract
Taking its cue from Michel Foucault’s analyses of the pastoral ‘conduct of conduct’, this paper considers social media as a specific dispositif that derives its mode of operation from the religious techniques of individualization. It argues that today’s preoccupation with digital performances, far from exorcizing the pastoral logic, in fact manifests its secular intensification. By examining social media practices through the lens of the sacramental paradigm of confession, the article shows how the digitalization of the pastoral directive culminates in the production of spectral subjects. These spectral subjects, it contends, function as the conduits of the dominant power, guaranteeing the persistence of capitalism by embodying the imperative to complete economization. © The Author(s) 2024.

Author Keywords
confession; Michel Foucault; pastoral power; social media; subjectification

International Workshop: New Perspectives on Foucault’s Corpus: Digital Humanities and Scientific Projects
University of Pavia, 31 May 2024, 10AM-6PM

The one-day workshop intends to take stock of the new Foucault corpus emerging from the archives, starting in particular with the digital humanities projects currently underway. In the light of this research, some of the researchers currently working on several of the philosophical themes emerging from the new corpus will take the floor. More specifically, the topics addressed will be the following:

– Foucault’s relationship with ancient philosophy;

– Foucault’s reading of Kant;

– the 1970s: the relationship between philosophy and history.

The conference will be accessible also via streaming:
https://zoom.us/j/98590337540?pwd=L1BzVkp3RXhhcWczejhBMmdac1ZaQT09
ID: 985 9033 7540
Code: 296362

For any further information contact: elisabettagiovanna.basso@unipv.it

Cabrera, N.L., Batchelder, G.D., Oregon, Y.G., Zamora, E.J.
CRToP: toward a critical race theory of power in higher education
(2024) Race Ethnicity and Education, .

DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2024.2306380

Abstract

Critical Race Theory (CRT) is one of the most common forms of racial analysis in educational research, and it is largely responsible for introducing racial power into higher education scholarship. Frequently, scholars in this area make mention of power, yet explicit definitions within this work remain elusive. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it offers Lukes’ (2005/2021) three dimensions of power as a way of operationalizing Foucault’s theories of power/knowledge and domination in relation to CRT, and it explores how centering this power analysis potentially expands higher education racial analyses. It then takes insights generated CRT scholarship on student activism and the power dynamics around knowledge creation/dissemination to challenge some of the White normativity within Lukes’ theorizing. Ultimately, the synthesis generates the underlying concept, Critical Race Theory of Power (CRToP), which offers CRT a more nuanced understanding of how power is enacted in higher education space while also problematizing Lukes’ (2005/2021) contention that all power involves domination. © 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Author Keywords

Critical race theory; Critical race theory of power; hegemony; higher education; power