Chapter 7: Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding

Print this chapter (1.0MB)

Note: Links in references were correct at the time of release, but may no longer be active because of changes at the referenced organization's web site.

Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I. 2005. A meta-analysis of science knowledge and attitudes across cultures. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, February, Washington, DC.

Blizzard R. 2005. Healthcare concerns whites, life-and-death matter for blacks. Gallup Poll News Service, 12 April. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=15835&pg=1. Accessed 13 September 2005.

Brown T. 2004. Small science generates a big fuss. The Times (UK), 25 October.

Burkholder R. 2005. Internet use: behind "the great firewall of China." Gallup Poll News Service, 1 February. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/login.aspx?ci=14776. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Canadian Biotechnology Secretariat. 2005. Canada-U.S. Survey on Biotechnology. Ottawa, Ontario.

Carlson DK. 2005a. Public priorities: environment vs. economic growth. Gallup Poll News Service, 12 April. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=15820&pg=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Carlson DK. 2005b. Who will protect the environment? Gallup Poll News Service, 26 April. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=16015&pg=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Carlson DK. 2005c. Public warm to nuclear power, cool to nearby plants. Gallup Poll News Service, 3 May. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=16111&pg=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

CBS News. 2002. Poll: most believe in psychic phenomena. CBS News Polls, 28 April. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/04/29/opinion/polls/main507515.shtml. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology. 2002. Chapter 7: Public scientific literacy and attitudes towards S&T. In China Science and Technology Indicators 2002. Beijing, China.

Chism O. 2002. Why 'fact' TV keeps trotting out bigfoot. Dallas Morning News, 16 September.

Cobb MD, Macoubrie J. 2004. Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6:395-405.

Cole J. 2004. Surveying the Digital Future: Year Four. Ten Years, Ten Trends. Los Angeles, CA: USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future. http://www.digitalcenter.org/downloads/DigitalFutureReport-Year4-2004.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. 2003. http://www.csicop.org. Accessed 22 September 2005.

Davis JA, Smith TW, Marsden PV. 2005. General Social Surveys: 1972-2004 Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: University of Chicago, National Opinion Research Center.

Dean C. 2005. Evolution takes a back seat in U.S. classes. New York Times, 1 February.

Dunlap RE. 2005. Half of Americans say Bush doing poor job on environment. Gallup Poll News Service, 22 April. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=15964&pg=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

European Commission. 2001. Europeans, Science and Technology. Eurobarometer 55.2. http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb/ebs_154_en.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2005.

European Commission 2005(a). Europeans, Science and Technology. Eurobarometer 224/Wave 63.1 http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_224_report_en.pdf. Accessed 13 September 2005.

European Commission 2005(b). Social Values, Science and Technology. Eurobarometer 225/Wave 63.1.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf. Accessed 13 September 2005.

Gokhberg L, Shuvalova O. 2004. Russian Public Opinion of the Knowledge Economy: Science, Innovation, Information Technology and Education as Drivers of Economic Growth and Quality of Life. Moscow, Russia: The British Council Russia.

GolinHarris. 2004. US leadership in nanoscience should be a government priority, say survey respondents. Survey results released at the annual Albany Symposium on Global Technology; 14 September; Lake George, NY.

Hallman WK, Adelaja AO, Schilling BJ, Lang JT. 2002. Public Perceptions of Genetically Modified Foods: Americans Know Not What They Eat. New Brunswick, NJ: Food Policy Institute, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey. http://www.foodpolicyinstitute.org/docs/reports/NationalStudy2004.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Hallman WK, Hebden WC, Cuite CL. 2004. American perceptions of genetically modified foods in 2004. Presented before the Food Policy Institute, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey; 28 September.

Hallman WK, Hebden WC, Cuite CL, Aquino HL, Lang JT. 2004. Americans and GM Food: Knowledge, Opinion and Interest in 2004. New Brunswick, NJ: Food Policy Institute, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey. http://www.foodpolicyinstitute.org/docs/reports/NationalStudy2004.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Hallman WK, Schilling BJ, Turvey CG. 2004. Public Perceptions and Responses to Mad Cow Disease: A National Survey of Americans. New Brunswick, NJ: Food Policy Institute, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey. http://www.foodpolicyinstitute.org/docs/summary/madcowsum.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Harris Interactive. 2004a. Doctors, scientists, firemen, teachers and military officers top list as "most prestigious occupations." The Harris Poll 65, 15 September. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=494. Accessed 13 September 2005.

Harris Interactive. 2004b. Genetically modified foods and crops: public still divided on benefits and risks. The Harris Poll 49, 2 July. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=478. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Harris Interactive. 2004c. More than four in ten Internet users now have broadband-doubled in two years. The Harris Poll 63, 8 September. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=492. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Harris Interactive. 2004d. Email, research, news and weather, information about hobbies or special interests top the list of how people use the Internet as it continues to grow. The Harris Poll 98, 15 December. http://retention.harrisblackintl.com/harris_poll/printerfriend/index.asp?PID=527. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Houck M. 2005. Trace evidence. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science—The CSI effect: forensic science in the public imagination; 20 February; Washington, DC.

James Randi Educational Foundation. 2005. http://www.randi.org/. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Janzen JD. 2004. Penn & Teller. Flak Magazine, 4 March. http://flakmag.com/tv. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Korea Science Foundation. 2004. Survey on Public Attitude of Science and Technology 2004. Seoul, Korea.

kSERO Corporation, Inc. 2003. New poll shows dramatic rise in Americans' "DNA I.Q." 27 February. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-02/kc-nps022603.php. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Kubey R, Nucci M. 2004. National television news broadcasts: new results. Presented before the Food Policy Institute, Rutgers-the State University of New Jersey, 27 September.

Lang JT. 2004. Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States. Presented before the Food Policy Institute, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey; 28 September.

Leiserowitz A. 2004. Before and after The Day After Tomorrow: A national study of climate change risk perception and behavior. Environment 46(9):22-37.

Losh SC. 2004. Gender, education, and occupational digital gaps. Social Science Computer Review 22(2):152-166.

Losh SC, Tavani CM, Njoroge R, Wilke R, Mcauley M. 2003. What does education really do? Skeptical Inquirer 27(5):30-35.

Lyons L. 2004a. Americans register strong feelings on cloning issue. Gallup Poll News Service, 6 July. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=12265&pg=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Lyons L. 2004b. Stem cell research morally OK in Britain, Canada, and U.S. Gallup Poll News Service, 19 October. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=13681&pg=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Maienschein J. 1999. Commentary: To the future. Argument for scientific literacy. Science Communication September: 01–13.

Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre (MASTIC), Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment. 2001. Public Awareness of Science and Technology Malaysia 2000. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. http://www.mastic.gov. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Mason H. 2005. Darwin or divine? Teens' views on origin of species. Gallup Poll News Service, 8 March. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/login.aspx?ci=15163. Accessed 7 July 2005.

McInturff B, Harrington E. 2004. National opinion and congressional research. Presentation to Association of American Medical Colleges.

Miller JD, Pardo R, Niwa F. 1997. Public Perceptions of Science and Technology: A Comparative Study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Chicago: Chicago Academy of Sciences.

Moore DW 2004. Americans tepid on global warming accord. Gallup Poll News Service, 13. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=11287&pg=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Moore DW. 2005a. Conflicting polls show an uncertain public on ANWR. Gallup Poll News Service Polltalk, 8 March. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=15178&pg=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Moore DW. 2005b. Three in four Americans believe in paranormal. Gallup Poll News Service, 16 June http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/default.aspx?ci=16915. Accessed 13 September 2005.

National Center for Science Education. 2005. Creationist reversal in Tulsa. http://www.ncseweb.org/. Accessed 12 July 2005.

National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. 2002. The 2001 Survey of Public Attitudes Toward and Understanding of Science & Technology in Japan. Tokyo, Japan.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 2002. Communicating the Future: Best Practices for Communication of Science and Technology to the Public. Proceedings of conference sponsored by Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy, and NIST, U.S. Department of Commerce; 6–8 March; Gaithersburg, MD. Summary available at http://nist.gov/public_affairs/bestpractices/practices.html. Accessed 7 July 2005.

National Science Board. 1999. National Science Board statement on the action of the Kansas Board of Education on evolution. NSB 99-149, 20 August. http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsb99149. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Newport F. 2004. Third of Americans say evidence has supported Darwin's evolution theory. Gallup Poll News Service, 19 November. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/login.aspx?ci=14107. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Newport F. 2005. Space shuttle program a "go" for Americans. Gallup Poll News Service. 10 August. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=17761&pg=1. Accessed 13 September 2005.

Newport F, Strausberg M. 2001. Americans' belief in psychic and paranormal phenomena is up over last decade. Gallup Poll News Service. 8 June. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/login.aspx?ci=4483. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Nisbet MC. 2005. The competition for worldviews: values, information, and public support for stem cell research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(1):90–112.

Nisbet MC, Nisbet EC. 2005. Evolution and intelligent design. Geotimes 50(9):28–33.

Nisbet MC, Scheufele DA, Shanahan JE, Moy P, Brossard D, Lewenstein BV. 2002. Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research 29(5):584–608.

Park J. 2005. Comparing public attitudes and understanding about S&T in Asia: Why do they love mobile phones so much? Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science; 18 February; Washington, DC.

Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. 2004. Overview of findings: 2004 focus groups & poll. http://pewagbiotech.org/research/2004update/overview.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2004. News audiences increasingly politicized. Online news audience larger, more diverse. Biennial Media Consumption Survey. http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=215. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2005. News Interest Index: Public attentiveness to news stories: 1986–2004. http://people-press.org/nii/. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Pincock S. 2005. Creationism: From the US, with love. The Scientist 19(4):12.

Research!America. 2005. America Speaks: Poll Data Booklet. Vol. 6. Alexandria, VA. Forthcoming.

Saad L. 2004. Global warming on public's back burner. Gallup Poll News Service, 20 April 20. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=11398&pg=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Saad L. 2005a. Public's environmental outlook grows more negative. Gallup Poll News Service, 21 April. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=15961&pg=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Saad L. 2005b. Americans OK with using embryos in medical research. Gallup Poll News Service, 26 May. http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=16486&pg=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Scheufele DA. 2005. The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Working paper; 10 February; University of Wisconsin–Madison.

Sense About Science. 2004. Peer Review and the Acceptance of New Scientific Ideas. London, UK.

Shermer M. 1997. Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Small Times. 2004. Survey: Nano knowledge lags, but U.S. should lead. http://www.smalltimes.com/document_display.cfm?document_id=8289&keyword;=Harris&summary;=1startsum=1. Accessed 7 July 2005.

Sparks GG, Nelson CL, Campbell RG. 1997. The relationship between exposure to televised messages about paranormal phenomena and paranormal beliefs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 41(Summer):345–-59.

Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Center for Public Policy. 2004. Increasing opposition to cloning, but greater support for embryonic stem cell research. VCU Life Sciences Survey. http://www.vcu.edu/uns/Releases/2004/oct/VCU%20Life%20Sciences%20Survey-2004-Results.htm. Accessed 7 July 2005.