|
Berkeley Bibliography
(1979-2013)
Abad, Juan Vázques. “Observaciones sobre la noción de causa en el
opusculo sobre el movimiento de Berkeley.”
Analisis Filosofico
6 (1986): 35-44.
Abelove, H. “George Berkeley’s Attitude to John Wesley: the Evidence of
a Lost Letter.” Harvard Theological Review 70 (1977): 175-76.
Ablondi, Fred. “Berkeley, Archetypes, and Errors.” Southern Journal
of Philosophy 43 (2005): 493-504.
_____.
“Absolute
Beginners: Learning Philosophy by Learning Descartes and
Berkeley.”
Metascience
19 (2010): 385-89.
_____. “On the Ghosts of Departed Quantities.”
Metascience
21 (2012): 681-83.
_____. “Hutcheson,
Perception, and the Sceptic's Challenge.”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
20
(2012): 269-81.
Ackel,
Helen. Über den Prozess der menschlichen Erkenntnis bei John Locke
und George Berkeley.
München und Ravensburg: Grin, 2008.
Adamczykowa, Izabella. “The Role of the Subject in the Cognitive Process
after George Berkeley: Passive for Active Subject?”
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Sklodowska, Sectio 1
Philosophia-Sociologia
6 (1981): 43-57.
Addyman, David and Feldman, Matthew. “Samuel Beckett, Wilhelm Windelband,
and the Interwar "Philosophy Notes".” Modernism/Modernity 18
(2011): 755-70.
Agassi, Joseph.
“The Future of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” International Studies in
Philosophy 7 (1975), 167-78.
Aichele, Alexander. “Ich
Denke Was, Was Du Nicht Denkst, Und Das Ist Rot. John Locke Und George
Berkeley Über
Abstrakte Ideen Und Kants Logischer Abstraktionismus
I think
something that you do not think, and that is red. John Locke and
George
Berkeley
over abstract ideas and Kant's logical abstractionism.”
Kant-Studien 103 (2012): 25-46.
Airaksinen, Timo. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs
[Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 9.
_____. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs.” Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 48 (1987), 235-56.
_____. “The Chain and the Animal: Idealism in Berkeley’s Siris.”
In Gersh and Moran (2006), 224-43.
_____. “The Path of Fire: The Meaning and Interpretation of Berkeley’s
Siris.”
In
Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 261-81.
_____. “Berkeley and Newton on Gravity in Siris.” In Parigi
(2010b), 87-106.
_____. “Active Principles and Trinities in Berkeley’s Siris.”
Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 57-70.
_____. “Rhetoric and Corpuscularism in
Berkeley’s
Siris.”
History of European Ideas
37 (2011): 23-34.
_____. “Light and Causality in Siris.” In
Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 91-118.
_____ and Belfrage, Bertil, eds. Berkeley’s Lasting Legacy: 300 Years
Later.
Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2011.
Alejandra Manzo, Silvia. “Eter, espirito animal e causalidade no
Siris de George Berkeley: uma visao imaterialista da analogia entre
macrocosmo e microcosmo.”
Scientiae Studia
2 (2004): 179-205.
Alfonso, Louis, E. “The Notes on the Government and Population of the
Kingdom of Naples and Berkeley’s Probable Route to Sicily.”
Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 20-27.
Allaire, Edwin B. “Berkeley’s Idealism: Yet Another Visit.” In Muehlmann
(1995), 23-38.
Ameeri, Javed Iqbal. “Factors and Main Trends in Early British
Empiricism. An Overview.” Journal of European Studies 8 (1992):
78-93.
Ameriks, Karl. “Idealism from Kant to Berkeley.” In Gersh and Moran
(2006), 244-68.
Anapolitanos, D. A. “The Continuous and the Discrete: Leibniz versus
Berkeley and Locke.” Philosophical Inquiry 13 (1991): 1-24.
Andersen, K. “One of Berkeley’s Arguments on Compensating Errors in the
Calculus.”
Historia mathematica
38 (2011): 219-31.
Ariotti, Piero. “Benedetto Castelli and George Berkeley as Anticipators
of Recent Findings on the Moon Illusion.” Journal of the History of
the Behavioral Sciences 9 (1973): 328-32.
Armogathe, Jean-Robert. “Proofs of the Existence of God.” In Garber
(1998), 305-30.
Armstrong, D. M. “The Heart of Berkeley’s Metaphysics: a Reply to Ernest
Sosa.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 162-64.
Arsi’c, Branka. The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in
Berkeley (via Beckett). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,
2003.
Asfour, Amal and Williamson, Paul. “Splendid Impositions: Gainsborough,
Berkeley, Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 31 (1998): 403-32.
Asher, W. O. “Berkeley on Absolute Motion.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 4 (1987): 447-66.
Atherton, Margaret. “The Coherence of Berkeley’s Theory of Mind.”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (1983): 389-400.
_____. Berkeley’s Revolution in Vision. Ithaca: Cornell
University Press, 1990.
_____. “Corpuscles, Mechanism, and Essentialism in Berkeley and Locke.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 47-67.
_____. “Berkeley without God.” In Muehlmann (1995), 231-48.
_____. “Lady Mary Shepherd’s Case against George Berkeley.” British
Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (1996): 347-66.
_____. “How to write the History of Vision: Understanding the
Relationship between Berkeley and Descartes.” In Levin (1997), 139-66.
_____, ed. The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and
Hume.
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.
_____. “Apprendre à voir: les enseignements de la Défense de la
Théorie de la vision.” In Berlioz (2003), 135-57.
_____. “Comment Berkeley parvient à maintenir que la neige est blanche.”
In Charles (2004), 127-44.
_____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision and Its Reception.” In Winkler
(2005), 94-124.
_____. “The Objects of Immediate Perception.” In Daniel, New
Interpretations (2007), 107-19.
_____. “ ‘The Books Are in
the Study as Before’: Berkeley’s Claims About Real Physical Objects.”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 85-100.
Ayers, Michael R. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and Kant’s Transcendental
Idealism.” In Idealism Past and Present, ed. Godfrey Vesey.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 51-69.
_____. “Berkeley and the Meaning of Existence.” History of European
Ideas 7 (1986): 567-74.
_____. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In Garber (1998), 1003-61.
_____. “Ideas and Objective Being.” In Garber (1998), 1062-1107.
_____. “Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?” In Winkler (2005),
34-62.
_____. “Berkeley, Ideas, and Idealism.” In Daniel, Reexamining
Berkeley (2007), 11-28.
Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.”
In Garber (1998), 1003-1061.
Baber, H. E. “Berkeley and the Tattletale Paradox.” Idealistic
Studies 19 (1989): 79-82.
Baier, Annette. “The Intentionality of Intentions.” Review of
Metaphysics 30 (1977): 389-414.
Baladi, Naguib.
“Plotin et l’immatérialisme de Berkeley: témoignage de la Siris.”
In Plotino e il neoplatonismo in Oriente e in
Occidente, ed. Enrico Cerulli. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei,
1974, 597-604.
Baldwin, Louis. Portraits of God: Word Pictures of the Deity from the
Earliest Times through Today. Jefferson, N. C.: McFarland, 2012.
Barber, Kenneth F. and Gracia, Jorge J. E., eds.
Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy.
Albany: SUNY Press, 1994.
Bardout,
Jean-Christophe. “Berkeley et
les métaphysiques de son temps.”
Journal
of the History of Philosophy
46 (2008): 119-139.
Bar-On, A. Z. “Husserl’s Berkeley.” Analecta Husserliana 16
(1983): 353-63.
Barnouw, Jeffrey. “The Two Motives Behind Berkeley’s Expressly
Unmotivated Signs: Sure Perception and Personal Providence.” In Daniel,
New Interpretations (2007), 145-77.
Baum, Robert J. “The Instrumentalist and Formalist Elements of
Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science 3 (1972): 119-34.
Baxter, Donald. “Berkeley, Perception and Identity.” Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 51 (1991): 85-98.
_____. “Abstraction, Inseparability and Identity.” Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 57 (1997): 307-30.
Beal, M. W. “Berkeley’s Deletions.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy
6 (1976): 455-78.
Belfrage, Bertil. “A New Dating of Berkeley’s Draft Introduction.”
Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 10-11.
_____. “Notes
by Berkeley on Moral Philosophy.”
Berkeley Newsletter
2 (1978): 4-7.
_____.
“Review of Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries, edited by George
Thomas.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 10.
_____.
“Review of George Pitcher, Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter
2 (1978): 10.
_____.
“A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics in a Hitherto Unpublished
Berkeleian Manuscript.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 1-4.
_____.
“Review of Berkeley, Philosophisches Tagebuch, translated by
Wolfgang Breidert.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 17-19.
_____.
“Review of Edwin S. Gaustad, George Berkeley in America.”
Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 16-17.
_____.
“Corrigenda to ‘A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics’.” Berkeley
Newsletter 4 (1980): 19.
_____. “Review of Berkeley, Drei Dialogen zwischen Hulas und
Philonous.
Introduced by Wolfgang Breidert.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980):
17.
_____.
“The Newport Extract of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.”
Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 6-9.
_____.
“An Obscure Supplement to Volume One of Berkeley’s Works.”
Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 17-21.
_____.
“Dating Berkeley’s Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984):
7-13.
_____.
“Facts Concerning Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Berkeley Newsletter 7
(1984): 17-22.
_____.
“Strata in Berkeley’s Notebooks [Abstract].” Berkeley
Newsletter 8 (1985): 10-11.
_____.
“The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A.” Hermathena 139
(1985): 117-26.
_____.
“The Order and Dating of Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Revue internationale
de philosophie 154 (1985): 196-214.
_____.
“Berkeley’s Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708).” History of European
Ideas 7 (1986): 643-49.
_____.
“Development of Berkeley’s Early Theory of Meaning.”
Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
(1986): 319-30.
_____.
“Une nouvelle édition de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France
et de l’étranger (1986): 367-72.
_____,
ed., George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. An editio diplomatica
transcribed and edited with introduction and commentary.
Oxford: Doxa, 1987.
_____.
“A Response to M. A. Stewart’s ‘Berkeley’s Introduction Draft’.”
Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 1-10.
_____.
“The Constructivism of Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Cummins and
Zoeller (1992): 167-86.
_____.
“Berkeley.” In The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century British
Philosophers, ed. J. W. Yolton, J. V. Price, and J. Stephens.
Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999, 84-90.
_____.
“Vers une nouvelle interprétation de la Théorie de la vision de
Berkeley.”
In Berlioz (2003), 159-211.
_____.
“The Scientific Background of George Berkeley’s Idealism.” In Gersh and
Moran (2006), 202-23.
_____. “Berkeley’s Four Concepts of the Soul (1707-1709).” In Daniel,
Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 172-87.
_____.
“The Theological Positivism of George Berkeley (1707-1708).” In Lemetti
and Piirimäe (2007), 37-52.
_____. “A Paradigm Shift in George Berkeley’s Philosophy 1707-1709.”
Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 71-82.
_____. “Berkeley’s Way towards Constructivism,
1707-1709.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 3-14.
_____.
“On George
Berkeley’s Alleged Letter to Browne: A Study in Unsound Rhetoric.”
Berkeley Studies 22 (2011): 3-8.
Bellemare, Pierre and Raynor, David. “Berkeley’s Letters to le Clerc
(1711).”
Hermathena 146 (1989):
7-23.
Benítez, Laura. “El espíritu como principio activo en Berkeley.”
Analisis
Filosofico 6 (1986): 23-34.
Bennett, Jonathan. “On Translating Locke, Berkeley and Hume into
English.” Teaching Philosophy 17 (1994): 261-69.
_____. Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz,
Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.
Benschop, Hans Peter. Berkeley on Method and Metaphysics. Ph. D.
diss., University of Leiden, 1992.
_____. “Berkeley, Lee and Abstract Ideas.” British Journal for the
History of Philosophy 5 (1997): 55-66.
Benson, Charles. “Prior’s Authentic Narrative.”
Berkeley Newsletter
3 (1979): 14-15.
Ben-Zeev, A. “Reexamining Berkeley’s Notion of Suggestion.”
Conceptus
23 (1989): 21-30.
Berchielli, Laura. “Conoscenza analogica e teoria del significato nell’Alcifrone.
Novità e tradizione.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 383-92.
Berlioz, Dominique. “G. Berkeley: ‘Of Infinites’.”
Revue philosophique
(1982): 45-57.
_____. “ ‘To stand for’ et ‘to represent’ dans l’Introduction manuscrite
de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
(1986): 331-38.
_____. Berkeley. Un nominalisme réaliste (Paris: J. Vrin, 2000).
_____, ed. Berkeley: Langage de la perception et art de voir. Débats
philosophiques. Paris: PUF, 2003.
_____. “Vision et géométrie chez Berkeley.” in Charles (2004), 145-61.
_____, and Nef, Frederic. “Berkeley ou l’idée contre la représentation.”
In Ong-Van-Cung (2006), 163-77.
Berman, David. “Berkeley’s Letter to H. Clarke.” Berkeley Newsletter
1 (1977): 9.
_____. “Mrs. Berkeley’s Annotations in her Interleaved Copies of An
Account of the Life of Berkeley (1776).” Hermathena (1977):
15-28.
_____. “A New Berkeley Portrait.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978):
8-9.
_____. “A Note on Berkeley and his Catholic Countrymen.” Long Room
16-17 (1978): 26-28.
_____. “Berkeley’s Letter to Lord Orrey.” Berkeley Newsletter 3
(1979): 12-13.
_____. “Berkeley’s Departure for America: a New Letter.” Berkeley
Newsletter 4 (1980): 14.
_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophical Reception after America.”
Archiv fûr Geschichte der Philosophie
62 (1980): 311-20.
_____. “Bishop Berkeley and the Fountains of Living Waters.”
Hermathena 128 (1980): 21-31.
_____. “Cognitive Theology and Emotive Mysteries in Berkeley’s
Alciphron.” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy (1981):
219-29.
_____. “Did Berkeley Write Guardian 130?” Berkeley Newsletter
5 (1981): 10-13.
_____ and Berman, Jill. “The Fountains Portraits of Bishop Berkeley.”
Apollo (1982): 76-79.
_____. “Beckett and Berkeley.” Irish University Review (1984):
42-45.
_____. “Review of The Guardian, edited by John Calhoun Stephens.”
Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 23-26.
_____. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” Revue internationale de
philosophie 154 (1985): 215-22.
_____. “George Berkeley: Pictures by Goldsmith, Yeats and Luce.”
Hermathena 139 (1985): 9-23.
_____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Revolution: 19 November 1707 — 11 January
1708.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 603-8.
_____. “Berkeley’s Siris and the ‘Whiskey Patriots’.”
Eighteenth-Century Ireland, 1 (1986): 200-203.
_____. “The Jacobitism of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.”
Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986): 309-19.
_____, ed. George Berkeley. Eighteenth-Century Responses. New
York-London: Garland, 1989, 2 vols. In Pitcher (1988-1989).
_____, ed. George Berkeley, Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher: in
Focus. London; New York: Routledge, 1993.
_____. George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
_____. Berkeley and Irish Philosophy. London and New York:
Continuum, 2005.
_____. “Berkeley’s Life and Works.” In Winkler (2005), 13-33.
_____.
“The Distrustful Philosopher: Berkeley between the Devils and the Deep
Blue Sea of Faith.” In Parigi (2010b), 141-57.
_____ and Ross, Ian
Campbell. “George
Berkeley
and the Authorship of The Memoirs of Signor Gaudentio di Lucca.”
Irish University Review 41 (2011):
196-201.
_____. “The
Birth
of Scottish Philosophy from the Golden Age of Irish Philosophy.”
Eighteenth - Century Studies 45
(2012): 379-92.
Bermudez, Jose Luis. “The Adequacy of Simple Ideas in Locke: A
Rehabilitation of Berkeley’s Criticisms.”
Locke Newsletter
23 (1992): 347-54.
Bernabei,
Andrea. “Il ‘cieco di Molyneux’: un problema di percezione visiva nella
Francia illuminista.” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia
30 (1975): 132-66.
Bertini, Daniele, ed.
George Berkeley, Saggio su una nuova teoria della visione-Trattato
sui principi della conoscenza umana. Milano: R.C.S., 2004.
_____, ed. George
Berkeley, Alcifrone. Milano: R.C.S., 2005.
_____. “Berkeley”, in
Enciclopedia filosofica, edited by V. Melchiorre. Milano:
Rizzoli, 2006, vol. II, 1205-13.
_____. “Shaftesbury,
Mandeville, Berkeley e il mito del contratto sociale.” Fenomenologia
e Società 29 (2006): 128-45.
_____. “Hume e
l’immaterialismo.” Aquinas 49 (2006): 621-35.
_____. Sentire
Dio. L’immaterialismo come via per un’interpretazione mistica
dell’esperienza.
Assisi: Cittadella Editrice, 2007.
______. “Berkeley and Gentile: A Reading of Berkeley’s Master Argument.”
Idealistic Studies 37 (2007), 43-50.
______. “Μεστὰ πάντα σημείων: Plotinus, Leibniz, and Berkeley on
Determinism.” In Late Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth,
ed. Panayiota Vassilopoulou and Stephen R. L. Clark. Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 211-27.
______. “Berkeley, Theology and Bible Scholarship.” In Parigi (2010b),
123-39.
______. “La critica berkeleiana dell’autonomia morale.”
In
Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 309-18.
Bettcher, Talia Mae.
“Berkeley on Self-Consciousness.” In Daniel, New Interpretations
2007, 179-202.
_____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Spirit: Consciousness, Ontology and
the Elusive Subject. London: Continuum Publishing, 2007.
______ Berkeley: a guide
for the perplexed. London, New York : Continuum,
2008.
______“Berkeley and Hume on Self and Self-Consciousness.” In Topics
in Early Modern Philosophy of Mind, edited by Jon Miller.
Netherlands: Springer (2009), 193-222.
_____.
“Abstraction: Berkeley Against Locke.” In
Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 135-55.
_____. “Berkeley’s
Theory of Mind: Some New Models.”
Philosophy Compass
6 (2011): 689-98.
Beyhl, Helmut. Bischof Berkeley, der Mann, der den gesunden
Menschenverstand tanzen lässt: das ‘Problem’ des Beweises der Realität
der Außenwelt. Ph. D. Diss. University of Berlin, 1990.
Beyssade, Jean-Marie. “L’expérience du rêve et l’extétiorité (de
Descartes à Berkeley).” Revue philosophique de la France et de
l’étranger 111 (1986): 355-66.
_____. “Philosophie et apologétique chez Berkeley.” Revue
philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 377-84.
Bird,
Graham, ed.
A
Companion to Kant.
Malden, MA:
Blackwell, 2006.
Blackith, Robert. “A Berkeleian Time-Warp.” Berkeley Newsletter
10 (1987/88): 1-4.
Blake, J. B. “Addenda to Keynes: a Bibliography of Berkeley.”
Bibliographical Society of America Papers 73 (1979): 337-40.
Blay, Michel. “Deux moments de la critique du calcul infinitésimal :
Michel Rolle et George Berkeley.” Revue d’Histoire des sciences
39 (1983): 223-53.
Bolton, Martha Brandt. “Berkeley’s Objection to Abstract Ideas and
Unconceived Objects,” in Sosa (1987), 61-81.
_____. “Berkeley and Mental Representation: Why Not a Lockean Theory of
Ideas?.”
In
Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 77-106.
_____.
“Belief and Its Objects in Berkeley’s System.” In
Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 251-73.
Boman, Eugene C. “Casting
Out Beams:
Berkeley’s
Criticism of the Calculus.”
New York State Mathematics Teachers’ Journal
60 (2010): 9-13.
Bonk, Sigmund. Immaterialismus: Darstellung und Verteidigung von
George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis und immaterialistischem Weltbild.
München, 1990.
_____. “George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis.” Neue Zeitschrift für
systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 36 (1994): 268-83.
_____. “George Berkeleys Nachweis einer gottlichen Vorsehung.” Neue
Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 39
(1997): 176-90.
_____. “George Berkeley’s Theory of Time: ‘A-Total-Disaster’.” Studia
Leibnitiana 29 (1997): 198-210.
_____. “We see God”: George Berkeley’s Philosophical Theology.
Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1997.
_____. Abschied von der Anima mundi: die britische Philosophie im
Vorfeld der industriellen Revolution.
Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1999.
Bordner, S. Seth “Berkeley’s
‘Defense’ of ‘Commonsense’.” Journal of the History of Philosophy
49 (2011): 315-38.
Borges, Jorge Luis. “Berkeley’s Crossroads.” Berkeley Newsletter
14 (1995/96): 5-12.
Botterill, George. “God and First Person in Berkeley.” Philosophy
82 (2007): 87-114.
Bouveresse-Quilliot Renée, ed.
Cahiers
d’histoire de la philosophie: Berkeley.
Bourgogne: Centre Gaston Bachelard, 2000.
Bowen, Timothy W. Ontological Commitment in George Berkeley and David
Lewis : the Role of Common Sense.
Ph. D. dissertation. University of Oxford, 2008.
Božovič,
Miran. Der grosse Andere: Gotteskonzepte in der Philosophie der
Neuzeit. Wien: Turia und Kant, 1993.
_____; Klun, Branko; and Mervič,
Stojan. Vprašanje
Boga pri Berkeleyj : diplomska naloga.
Ljubljana: [S. Mervič]
(2008).
Bracken, Harry M. “Berkeley: Irish Cartesian.” Philosophical Studies
24 (1976): 39-51.
_____. “Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 11
(1977): 227-45.
_____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat
Missed [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 10.
_____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat
Missed.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 63-80.
_____. “On Some Points in Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” History of
Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987): 435-46.
______.“The Other Bishop
Berkeley: An Exercise in Reenchantment (review).”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 177.
Bradatan, Costica. “Berkeley and Liber Mundi.” Minerva. An
Internet Journal of Philosophy 3 (1999), University of Limerick,
Ireland.
_____. “Waiting for the eschaton: Berkeley’s ‘Bermuda Scheme’
Between Earthly Paradise and Educational Utopia.” Utopian Studies
14 (2003): 36-50.
_____. “Philosophy as Palimpsest. In Search for an Immemorial Wisdom.”
Existentia: An International Journal of Philosophy 14 (2004):
337-44.
_____. “ ‘God is Dreaming You’: Narrative as Imitatio Dei in
Miguel de Unamuno.” Janus Head: A Journal of Interdisciplinary
Studies in Continental Philosophy, Literature, Phenomenological
Psychology and the Arts 7 (2004): 453-46.
_____. “Review: Branka Arsic, The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity
in Berkeley (via Beckett).” Philosophy 24 (2004): 237-39.
_____. “‘One is All, and All is One.’ The Great Chain of Being in
Berkeley’s Siris.” In O’Gorman and Donald (2005), 63-82.
_____. “George Berkeley’s ‘Universal Language of Nature’.”
In Klaas van Berkel and Vanderjagt (2005), 71-84.
_____. Introduction to George Berkeley, Treatise Concerning the
Principles of Human Knowledge. New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 2006.
_____. “Rhetoric of Faith and Patterns of Persuasion in Berkeley’s ‘Alciphron’.”
Heythrop Journal 47 (2006): 544-61.
______. The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Re-enchantment.
New York: Fordham University Press, 2006.
_____. “George Berkeley e a tradição platônica.”
Tr. Jaimir Conte. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia 16 (2009):
257-84.
Bradshaw, D. E. “Berkeley and Hume on Abstraction and Generalization.”
History of Philosophy Quarterly 5 (1988): 11-22.
Brandt, Reinhard. “Historical Observations on the Genesis of the
Three-dimensional Optical Picture.”
Ratio
17 (1975): 176-90.
Braund, Michael J. From
inference to affordance: the problem of visual depth-perception in the
optical writings of Descartes, Berkeley, and Gibson.
St. Catharines, Ont.: Brock University, Dept. of Philosophy, 2008.
Bravo, Hamdi. “The Problem of Primary and Secondary Qualities in Locke
and Berkeley” [in Turkish].
Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
[Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences] 5 (2008): 59-80.
Brayton, Alice. George Berkeley in Apulia. Boston: Merrymount,
1946 (republished 2007).
Breidert, Wolfgang.
“Corrigendum.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 13.
_____. “Einleitung” to George Berkeley, Drei Dialoge. Hamburg:
Felix Meiner Verlag, 1980.
_____. “Die Rezeption Berkeleys in Deutschland im 18 Jahrhundert.”
Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 223-41.
_____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Fridericana Zeitschrift der
Universität Karlsruhe 36 (1985): 3-13.
_____. “On Some Marginal Signs in the Philosophical Commentaries.”
Berkeley Newsletter
8 (1985): 7-8.
_____. “With
the Infinite God Against the Mathematics of Infinity [Abstract].”
Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 11-12.
_____. “Berkeley’s De Ludo Algebraico and Notebook B.”
Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 12-14.
_____. “Berkeley’s Kritik an der Infinitesimalrechnung.”
Studia Leibnitiana
14 (1986): 185-91.
_____. “On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germany.”
In Sosa (1987), 231-41.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Versuch über eine Theorie des Sehens und
Die Theorie des Sehens .. verteidigt und erklär.
Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1987.
_____. “Review: Essays on Berkeley, edited by John Foster and
Howard Robinson.”
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
69 (1987): 315-21.
_____. “Schopenhauer und Berkeley.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 69
(1988): 373-85.
_____. George Berkeley 1685-1753. Basel: Birkhauser, 1989.
_____. “Berkeley, George.” In Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche,
vol. 2, 1994, col. 260.
_____, Einleitung in George Berkeley, Alciphron oder der Kleine
Philosoph.
Translated by Luise und Friedrich Raab; edited by Wolfgang
Breidert.
Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1996.
_____. “Berkeley’s Sources in Mathematics.” In Brykman (1997), 49-58.
_____. “George Berkeley. Philosophie des Immaterialismus.”
In Philosophen des 18. Jahrhunderts, edited by Kreimendahl and
Lothar. Darmstadt, 2000, 68-86.
_____. “Berkeley’s Defence of Infinite God in the Contrast to the
Infinite in Mathematics.” In Koetsier and Bergmans (2005), 499-508.
_____. “Berkeley Poeticized.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley
(2007), 214-29.
_____. “Die Ambivalenz von Vorurteilen bei Berkeley.” In Jaffro,
Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 287-95.
Breuninger, Scott Christopher.
Morals, the Market, and History: George Berkeley and Social Virtue in
Early Eighteenth-Century Thought.
Ph. D. diss., University of Wisconsin, 2002.
________.
“Rationality and Revolution:
Rereading Berkeley’s Sermons on Passive Obedience.”
New Hibernia Review 12 (2008): 63-86.
_______. Recovering Bishop Berkeley : Virtue and Society in the
Anglo-Irish Context. New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
_____. “Planting an Asylum for Religion: Berkeley’s Bermuda Scheme and
the Transmission of Virtue in the Eighteenth-Century Atlantic World.”
Journal of Religious History 34 (2010): 414-29.
Brolley, Kevin G. “Review of Berkeley by J. O. Urmson.”
Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 22-23.
Brook, Richard. “Berkeley, Causality and Signification.”
International Studies in Philosophy 27 (1995): 15-31.
_____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision, Transparency and Signification.”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11(2003): 661-69.
_____. “Berkeley, Bundles, and Immediate Perception.” Dialogue
44 (2005): 493-504.
_____.
“Is
Geometry about Tangible Extension?”
Berkeley Studies 20 (2009): 5-12.
_____. “Non-Conscious Agency and Berkeley’s Theory of Signs.” In
Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 287-99.
Brown, Michael. “The Biter Bitten: Ireland and the Rude Enlightenment.”
Eighteenth - Century Studies 45 (2012): 393-407.
Brown, Stuart. “Leibniz on Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter
8 (1985): 13-14.
_____. “Platonic Idealism in Modern Philosophy from Malebranche to
Berkeley.” in Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context.
Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1997, 197-214.
Brueckner,
Anthony. “Idealism and Scepticism.” Theoria 77 (2011): 368-71.
Brykman, Geneviève. “Berkeley: sa lecture de Malebranche à travers le
Dictionaire de Bayle.” Revue internationale de philosophie 29
(1975): 496-514.
_____. “Berkeley, lecteur et critique de Spinoza.” Recherches sur le
XVIIème Siècle 2 (1978): 173-92.
_____. “Le cartésianisme dans le De Motu.”
Revue internationale de philosophie
3 (1979): 553-69.
_____. “The Close Inspection of Words and Ideas in Berkeley’s Writings.”
Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 9-10.
_____.
“Abstracts of ‘Le Cartesianisme dans le De Motu’ and ‘Pouvoir
d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter
4 (1980): 15.
_____. “Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley.”
Recherches sur le XVIIème siècle 4 (1980): 157-66.
_____. “Berkeley à Newport: 1729-1779.” Recherches sur le XVIIème
Siècle 4 (1980): 167-69.
_____. “Berkeley et l’interieur absolu des choses.” Revue
philosophique (1980): 421-32.
_____. “Philosophy and Apologetics in Berkeley.”
Berkeley Newsletter
6 (1982/83): 12-16.
_____.
“Le modèle visuel de la connaissance chez Berkeley.” Revue
philosophique (1983): 427-41.
_____. Berkeley: philosophie et apologétique. 2 vols. Lille:
Atelier National de reproduction des thèses. Paris: Vrin, 1984.
_____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley [Abstract].”
Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 12-13.
_____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley.” Hermathena
139 (1985): 127-37.
_____.
“Principe de ressemblance et hétérogénéité des idées chez Berkeley.”
Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 242-51.
_____. “L’esprit et les idées visuelles dans la Nouvelle théorie de la
vision.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 585-91.
_____. “Tricentenaire ‘Berkeley’: (1685-1985).” Revue de synthèse
109 (1988): 148-50.
_____. “Berkeley et l’analogie des noms.” Les Etudes philosophiques
3-4 (1989): 445-54.
_____. “Sensibles communs et sens commun chez Locke et Berkeley.”
Revue de métaphysique et de morale (1991): 515-29.
_____.
“Review: George Berkeley, De Motu, translated into Italian with
an introduction by Mariapaola Fimiani.” Berkeley Newsletter 12
(1991/92): 17.
_____. Berkeley et le voile des mots. Paris: Vrin, 1993.
_____. “Vision, connaissance et ontologie chez Berkeley.” In Monti
(1995), 121-37.
_____, ed., Berkeley et le cartésianisme. Le Temps philosophique
2. Nanterre: Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1997.
_____., ed. Rassemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme
britannique. Le Temps philosophique 6. Nanterre: Département de
Philosophie, Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1999.
_____. “Plaisir/douleur et passivité des idées dans l’immaterialisme de
Berkeley. ” In Bouveresse-Quilliot (2000), 15-35.
_____. “L’hétérogénéité des idées sensibles et le ‘langage de la Nature’
chez Locke et Berkeley.”
In Berlioz (2003), 17-46.
_____. “On Human Liberty in Berkeley’s Alciphron VII.” In Daniel,
New Interpretations (2007), 231-46.
_____.
“Berkeley, Spinoza and Radical Enlightenment.”
In Parigi (2010b), 159-70.
_____. “Courte vue et vision synoptique chez Berkeley.” Revue
Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 83-95.
_____. “La liberté humaine dans le Dialogue VII de l’Alciphron.”
In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 331-40.
_____. “La sémantique dans le Dialogue VII.”
In
Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 407-12.
_____. “Short-Sightedness and Long-Sightedness
in Berkeley.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 195-206.
Bruce, Michael and Barbone, Steven.
“Berkeley's
Master Argument for Idealism.”
Just the Arguments (2011): 68-69.
Bunnin, N. F. The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford:
Blackwell, 1996.
Burnyeat, M. F. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and
Berkeley Missed.”
Idealism Past and Present (1982): 19-50.
Bustamante, Rodrigo. “La critica de Berkeley al infinito categorico.”
Contrafuerte
(1985): 28-34.
Byrne, P. A. “Berkeley, Scientific Realism and Creation.” Religious
Studies 20 (1984): 453-64.
Caffentzis, C. George, Über die Ursachen von “The Querist”: Vademecum
zu einem irischen Klassiker der politischen Ökonomie.
Düsseldorf: Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen, 1999.
_____. Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy
of Money. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.
_____. “Medical Metaphors and Monetary Strategies in the Political
Economy of Locke and Berkeley.” History of Political Economy 35
(2003: supplement): 204-33.
_____. “Algebraic
Money: Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics and Money.” Berkeley
Studies 18 (2007): 3-23.
_____. “Locke,
Berkeley and Hume as Philosophers of Money. An Apology and Synopsis.” In
Parigi (2010b), 57-71.
_____.
“Did Hume Read Berkeley’s The Querist?”
In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 157-74.
Calazans, Alex.
“Considerações
a Respeito do Problema do Rigor Matemático em O Analista.”
Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 391-418.
Campagnola, Francesco. “George
Berkeley e la teoria dell'analogia divina.”
Nouvelles-de-la-Republique-des-lettres
2 (2006): 25-76.
Camporesi, Cristiano. “Aporie berkeleyane.”
Rivista di filosofia
73 (1982): 471-73.
Cantor, Geoffrey N. “Berkeley, Reid and the Mathematization of
Mid-Eighteenth-Century Optics.” Journal of the History of Ideas
38 (1977): 429-48.
_____. “Two Letters Relating to Berkeley’s Social Circle.” Berkeley
Newsletter 4 (1980): 1-3.
_____. “Berkeley’s The Analyst Revisited.” Isis 75 (1984):
668-83.
Carlin, Laurence. “Selecting a Phenomenalism: Leibniz, Berkeley and the
Science of Happiness.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (2007):
57-78.
______.
The Empiricists: A Guide for the Perplexed.
London, New York: Continuum, 2009.
Casini, Paolo. “Newton’s Principia and the Philosophers of the
Enlightenment.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London
42 (1988): 35-52.
Cates, Lynn D. “Berkeley on the Work of the Six Days.” Faith and
Philosophy 14 (1997): 82-86.
Çetin, Ismail. “The
‘Language Metaphor’ and Its Implications in George Berkeley’s
Philosophy.”
Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal
of Philosophy] 14 (2010): 123-30.
Chaney, Edward. The Evolution of the Grand Tour since the
Renaissance. London: Franck Cass, 1998.
Charles, Sébastien. “L’abbé Raynal, author of an unnoticed review of
Berkeley’s Dialogues.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98):
14-18.
_____. “The Siris in the Age of Enlightenment: Panacea or
Imposture?” Hermathena 168 (2000): 55-69.
_____. “Hume and Berkeley in the Prussian Academy: Louis Frederic
Ancillon’s ‘Dialogue between Berkeley and Hume’ of 1796.” Hume
Studies 27 (2001): 85-97.
_____. “Ocasionalismo y modernidad: Berkeley, lector critico de
Malebranche.” Praxis Filosofica 13 (2001): 27-42.
_____. “Existence et temporalité au Siècle des Lumières: Turgot lecteur
de Maupertuis et Berkeley.” Lumen 21 (2002): 45-59.
_____. Berkeley au siècle des lumières: immatérialisme et scepticisme
au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: J. Vrin, 2003.
_____. “Berkeley occasionaliste malgré lui? De la causalité et de la
volonté chez Malebranche et Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 73-88.
_____, ed., Science et épistémologie selon Berkeley.
Saint-Nicolas, Québec: Les Presses l’Université Laval, 2004.
_____. “Berkeley and the Lumières: Misconception and
Reconstruction.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 283-309.
_____. “Berkeley polémiste: des Sérmons sur l’obéissance passive
(1712) aux Maximes sur le patriotisme (1750)” The European
Legacy 13 (2008): 413-24.
_____. “Berkeley et Campailla: recontre infructueuse ou influence
probable?”
Giornale Critico
della Filosofia Italiana
88 (2009): 25-39.
_____.
“The Animal According to Berkeley.” In Parigi (2010b), 189-99.
_____. “Berkeley et l’imagination.”
Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger
135 (2010), 97-108.
_____. “La réception de l’Alciphron en France au siècle des
Lumières.”
In
Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 371-79.
_____. “Berkeley
et Campailla: rencontre infructueuse ou influence probable?”
Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana
88 (2009): 25-39.
_____. “Foi, croyance et raison selon Berkeley.”
Science et Esprit
63 (2011): 135-47.
Cicekdagi, Caner. “Esse Est Percipi in Berkeley’s Book Three
Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous.” Kaygi: Uludag
Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal of
Philosophy] 10 (2008): 115-26.
Chibeni, Silvio Seno. “Berkeley:
Uma física sem causas eficientes.”
Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 357-90.
_____. “Berkeley e o papel das hipóteses na filosofia natural Berkeley
and the role of hypothesis in natural philosophy.”
Scientiae Studia
8 (2010): 389-419.
Chinn, Ewing Y. “The anti-abstractionism of Dignana and Berkeley.”
Philosophy East and West
44 (1994): 55-77.
Chiurazzi, G. “Il problema della mediazione nella filosofia di George
Berkeley.”
Filosofia
49 (1998): 53-75.
Clark, Stephen R. L., Money, Obedience, and Affection: Essays on
Berkeley’s Moral and Political Thought. New York: Garland, 1989.
_____. “Berkeley on Religion.” In Winkler (2005), 369-404.
Clarke, Desmond M. George
Berkeley: Philosophical Writings. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press (2008).
Clarke, Desmond M. and Wilson, Catherine, eds. The Oxford Handbook of
Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. New York: Oxford University
Press, 2011.
Clasen, Uwe.
Die Sehtheorien von René Descartes und George Berkeley im Spiegel der
Geschichte der physiologischen Optik.
Aachen: Tecn. Hochsch. Diss., 1997.
Collingridge, D. G. “Berkeley on Space, Sight and Touch.” Philosophy
53 (1978): 102-105.
Conley, Patrick T. Rhode Island’s Founders: from Settlement to
Statehood. Charleston, SC: History Press, 2010.
Conroy, Graham P. “George Berkeley and the Jacobite Heresy: Some
Comments on Irish Augustan Politics.”
Albion
3 (1971): 82.
Conte, Jaimir. “A
Oposição de Berkeley ao Ceticismo.”
Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 325-55.
Cope, Kevin L. “Moral Travel and the Pursuit of Nothing: Vathek and
Siris as Philosophical Monologue.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century
Culture 18 (1988): 167-86.
Coutinho, Maurício C. “Os
Escritos Econômicos de Berkeley.”
Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia
18 (2008): 293-324.
Cover, J. A. Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy.
Indianapolis: Hacket, 1990.
Coxito, Amandio Augusto. “Un texto de Luis A. Vernei contra o
imaterialismo de Berkeley.”
Revista Filosofia de Coimbra
6 (1997): 101-17.
Crain, Steven D. “Must a Classical Theist Be an Immaterialist?”
Religious Studies 33 (1997): 81-92.
Creery, Walter E., ed., George Berkeley: Critical Assessments.
London; New York: Routledge, 1991, 3 vols.
Crombie, Alistair C. George Berkeley Bicentenary. New York:
Garland, 1988.
Cross, C. B. “Berkeley on Other Minds.”
Auslegung
6 (1978): 45-50.
Cummins, Phillip and Zoeller, Guenter, eds. Minds, Ideas, and
Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy.
Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Company, 1992.
_____.
“Berkeley’s Ideas of Sense.” Nous 9 (1975): 55-72.
_____. “Berkeley’s Unstable Ontology.” Modern Schoolman 67
(1989): 15-32.
_____. “Sections Nine and Ten of Berkeley’s Principles.”
Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 1-5.
_____. “Berkeley on Minds and Agency.” In Winkler (2005), 190-229.
_____.”Perceiving and Berkeley’s Theory of Substance.” In Daniel,
Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 121-52.
Curtis, Benjamin L. “A New Look at Berkeley’s Idealism.” Heythrop
Journal 50 (2009), 189-94.
Danaher, James P. “Is Berkeley’s World a Divine Language?” Modern
Theology 18 (2002): 361-73.
Dancy, Jonathan. Berkeley: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell,
1987.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of
Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between Hylas and
Philonous. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Daniel, Stephen H. “George Berkeley, Francis Suarez, and the
Esse-Existere Distinction.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly
74 (2000): 621-36.
_____. “The Ramist Context of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” British Journal
for the History of Philosophy 9 (2001): 487-505.
_____. “Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist Logic.” Idealistic Studies
31 (2001): 55-72.
_____. “Berkeley’s Pantheistic Discourse.” International Journal for
Philosophy of Religion 49 (2001): 179-94.
_____. “Berkeley's Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine
Ideas.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2001): 239-58.
_____. “Les limites de la philosophie naturelle de Berkeley.” In Charles
(2004), 163-70.
_____. “Berkeley’s Stoic Notion of Spiritual Substance.” In Daniel,
New Interpretations (2007), 203-30.
_____ “The Harmony of the Leibniz-Berkeley Juxtaposition.” In Leibniz
and the English Speaking World, ed. Stuart Brown and Pauline
Phemister. New York: Springer/Kluwer (2007), 163-80.
_____, ed. New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought. Journal of
the History of Philosophy Books Series. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books,
2007.
_____, ed. Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. Toronto: University
of Toronto Press, 2007.
_____.
“Berkeley’s
Semantic Treatment of Representation.”
History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (2008): 41-55.
_____.
“How Berkeley’s Works Are Interpreted.” In Parigi (2010b), 3-14.
_____. “Berkeley and Spinoza.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de
l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 123-34.
_____. “Berkeley’s
Rejection of Divine Analogy.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011):
149-61.
_____. “Stoicism in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage
(2011), 121-34.
_____.
“Berkeley's
'Alciphron': English Text and Essays in Interpretation.” British
Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 563-66.
_____.
Review of
Berkeley’s
Alciphron: English Text and Essays in Interpretation, eds.
Laurent Jaffro, Geneviève Brykman, and Claire Schwartz. British
Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 563-66.
Daniel, Stephen H. and Charles, Sébastien. “Montréal Conference
Summaries.” Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 54-57.
Darren,
Hynes.
“Berkeley’s Corpuscular Philosophy of Time.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 22 (2005): 339-56.
Darwall, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Moral and Political Philosophy.” In
Winkler (2005), 311-38.
Davis, John W. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of
Ideas 21 (1960): 392-408.
De Almeida Marques, José Oscar. “Berkeley
e o Problema de Barrow.”
Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 419-45.
Dégremont, Roselyne. Berkeley. L’idée de nature. Paris: Presses
universitaires de France, 1995.
_____. Berkeley. Paris: Ellipses, 1999.
_____.
“Le principe de la morale.”
Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger
135 (2010), 45-56.
De Waal, Cornelis. “The Real Issue Between Nominalism and Realism:
Peirce and Berkeley Reconsidered.” Transactions of the Charles S.
Peirce Society 32 (1996): 425-33.
_____. “Having an Idea of Matter: A Peircean Refutation of Berkeleyan
Immaterialism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (2006):
291-313.
Dicker, Georges. “Two Arguments from Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s
Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous.” Southern Journal of
Philosophy 20 (1982): 409-22.
_____. “Berkeley on the Immediate Perception of Objects.” In Cummins and
Zoeller (1992), 201-13.
_____. “Berkeley on Immediate Perception: Once More Unto the Breach.”
Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2006): 517-35.
_____.
“Anti-Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16
(2008): 335-50.
_____.
Berkeley’s Idealism: A Critical Examination.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Di Michele, Stefano. “George Berkeley in America: nostalgia del vedere.”
Annali della Facolta di Lettere e Filosofia 39 (1996): 141-63.
Doney, Willis. “Is Berkeley’s a Cartesian Mind?”
In Turbayne (1982), 273-82.
_____. “Berkeley’s Argument Against Abstract Ideas.” Midwest Studies
in Philosophy 8 (1983): 295-308.
_____. Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas. New York:
Garland, 1989.
Dooren, W. Van. “Whether There Be Any Reason Why Berkeley Is So Often
Misunderstood?”
Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappijen en wetenschap
26 (1985-6).
Downing, Lisa J. “Berkeley’s Case Against Realism About Dynamics.” In
Muehlmann (1995), 197-216.
_____. “Siris and the Scope of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (1995): 279-300.
_____. “Berkeley’s Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Science.” In
Winkler (2005), 230-65.
_____. “Occasionalism and Strict Mechanism: Malebranche, Berkeley,
Fontenelle.” In Mercer and O’Neill (2005), 206-30.
Drebushenko, D. “Abstraction and a New Argument for the Esse-Is-Percipi
Thesis.” Hermathena 167 (1999): 35-58.
Drunga, Mykolas. “Berkeley and the Time-Gap Argument.” In
Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 55-75.
D’Souza, Paul. “Salvation in Non-Christian Religions: Aristotle and
Berkeley. Philosophical Contribution to a Theological Question.”
Divyadaan 16 (2005): 17-32.
Dubois, Pierre. L’oeuvre de Berkeley. Paris: Vrin, 1985.
Dunlop, Katherine. “The Role of Visual Language in Berkeley’s Account of
Generality.” Philosophy & Phenomenological
Research. 83 (2011): 525-59.
Dunn, John; Urmson, J. O; and Ayer, A. J. The British Empiricists:
Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 1992.
Dupas, Jean-Claude. “Le visible et l’invisibile chez Berkeley.”
Études irlandaises (1986): 45-56.
Easton, Patricia A., ed., Logic and the Workings of the Mind.
Atascadero: Eastview, 1997.
Eaton, Jeffrey C. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and the Scientific Promise
of the Christian Doctrine of Creation.” Harvard Theological Review
80 (1987): 431-47.
Eberwein, Robert. “Samuel Johnson, George Cheyne, and the ‘Cone of
Being’.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (1975): 153-58.
Echeverri Saldarriaga, Santiago. “‘Subjetividad’ e ‘immaterialismo’en la
filosofia de George Berkeley.”
Revista colombiana de filosofia de la ciencia 3 (2002):
179-208; republished in Estudios de filosofia 27 (2003): 127-48.
Egan, Frances. “The Moon Illusion.” Philosophy of Science 65
(1998): 604-23.
Eisenstein, G. “Berkeley’s Presence: Metaphysical Development and
Dialectical Tension.” Idealistic Studies 18 (1988): 207-29.
El-Bizri, Nader. “A
Philosophical Perspective on Alhazen’s Optics.”
Arabic Sciences and
Philosophy
15 (2005): 189-218.
Emundts, Dina. “Kant’s
Critique of Berkeley’s Concept of Objectivity.” In
Kant and the Early Moderns ed. Daniel Garber and Béatrice
Longuenesse. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008, 117-41.
Enright, J. T. “The Moon Illusion Examined from a New Point of View.”
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 119 (1975):
87-107.
Eric, Dietrich. “The Bishop and Priest: Toward a Point-of-View Based
Epistemology of True Contradictions.” Logos Architekton. Journal of
Logic and Philosophy of Science 2 (2008): 35-58.
Esenyel, Adnan. “Idealism and Kant’s Conception of Space” (in Turkish).
Kaygi: Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi (Uludag University
Journal of Philosophy) 17 (2011): 149-62.
Evans, J. D. G. “Berkeley on Conceiving the Unconceived.” Irish
Journal of Philosophy 2 (1985): 79-93.
Everitt, Nicholas. “Quasi-Berkelyan Idealism as Perspicuous Theism.”
Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997): 353-77.
Falkenstein, Lorne. “Intuition and Construction in Berkeley’s Account of
Physical Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (1994):
63-84.
Faris, J. A. “Review of Berkeley: Critical and Interpretative Essays
edited by C. M. Turbayne.”
Berkeley Newsletter
7 (1984): 26-32.
Fau, Martina. Berkeleys Theorie der visuellen Sprache Gottes: ihre
Bedeutung für die Philosophie des Immaterialismus und ihre historischen
Würzeln. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1993.
Fedriga, Riccardo. “Oggetti
e aspetti intenzionali nella teoria dell’astrazione di George Berkeley.”
Dianoia: Annali di Storia della Filosofia 15 (2010): 147-66.
Feuer, Lewis F. “Materialism, Idealism and Science.”
Philosophy of Science
15 (1948): 71-75.
Fields, Keota. Berkeley: Ideas, Immaterialism, and Objective Presence.
Lanham: Lexington Books, 2011.
Fimiani, Mariapaola.
George Berkeley: il nome e l’immagine.
Cosenza: Lerici,
1979.
Fincham, R. M.
“Transcendental Idealism and the Problem of the External World.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2011): 221- 41.
Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley’s Notions.”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
45 (1985): 407-25, reprinted in George Berkeley: Critical Assessments,
edited by Walter E. Creery, London and New York: Routledge (1991),
404-24.
_____.“Berkeley
on Abstraction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986):
483-501; reprinted in Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas,
edited by Willis Doney, in The Philosophy of George Berkeley Series,
New York: Garland (1988).
_____. Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions: a Reconstruction Based on his
Theory of Meaning. London: Croom Helm, 1987.
_____. “Relative Ideas and Notions.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992),
235-53.
_____. “Berkeley, Individuation and Physical Objects.” In Barber and
Gracia (1994), 133-54.
_____. “George Berkeley.” In The Encyclopedia of Empiricism,
edited by Don Garrett and Edward Barbanell. Westport, CT: Greenwood
Press (1997), 44-55.
_____. “Berkeley’s Archetypes.” Hermathena 171 (2001): 7-31.
_____. "Berkeley’s Principles, Section 10." Journal of the
History of Philosophy 40 (2003): 543-51.
_____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Principles.”
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 25-60.
_____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Internet Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (2006).
http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/b/berkeley.htm.
_____. Berkeley’s
Ideas of Reflection.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006): 7-13.
_____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Three Dialogues.” In
Daniel (2008), 45-75.
_____. “Was Berkeley and Ethical Egoist?” Berkeley Studies 19
(2008): 3-18.
_____. “Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.” Philosophia 37
(2009): 361-72.
_____. “Remarks on Professor Grandi’s Comments.” Philosophia 37
(2009): 379-80.
_____.
“Analysis in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.”
In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),
35-53.
Fleming, N. “Berkeley and Idealism.” Philosophy 60 (1985):
300-325.
_____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Principles.”
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 25-60.
_____.“Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Three Dialogues.” In
Daniel, New Interpretations (2007): 47-75.
Fleming, Patrick. “Berkeley’s Immaterialist Account of Action.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2006): 415-29.
Flew, Anthony. “Was Berkeley a Precursor of Wittgenstein?” In Berman
(1993), 214-26.
Fogelin, Robert. “Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite
Divisibility.” Philosophical Review 97 (1988): 47-69.
_____. “The Intuitive Basis of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” History of
Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996): 331-44.
_____. Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge. London and
New York: Routledge, 2001.
Forest, Denis. “Language visuel, communication universelle.”
Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
4 (1997): 429-46.
Foster, John and Robinson, Howard, eds., Essays on Berkeley: A
Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.
Fourny-Etchegaray, Claire. “Note sur les rapports entre raison et sens
commun chez Stillingfleet et Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz
(2010), 357-60.
_____. “Les diverses conceptions du sens commun et de son role dans l’Alciphron.”
In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 393-405.
Fox, Christopher. “Locke and the Scriblerians: the Discussion of
Identity in Early Eighteenth Century England.” Eighteenth-Century
Studies 16 (1982): 1-25.
Frangiotti, Marco Antonio. “Transcendental Idealism and Phenomenalism.”
Critica 26 (1994): 73-95.
Frankel, Henry. “Berkeley’s Concept of Mind as Presented in Book II of
the Principles.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (1977):
37-51.
Frankel, Melissa. “Something-We-Know-Not-What,
Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meaning, and Minds.” Philosophia
37 (2009): 381-402.
_____. “Berkeley, Meaning and Minds: Remarks on Glezakos’ Comments.”
Philosophia 37 (2009), 409-413.
_____.
“Berkeley and God in the Quad.” Philosophy Compass 7 (2012):
388-96.
_____. Review of Berkeley: Ideas, Immaterialism, and Objective
Presence by Keota Fields. Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 46-50.
Frederick, R. “Berkeley and the Argument from Conceiving.” Philosophy
Research Archives 13 (1987/88): 481-87.
Friedman, Lesley. “Pragmatism: the Unformulated Method of Bishop
Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003): 81-96.
Fugate, Courtney David. “Berkeley’s Aesthetic of Transcendence.”
Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005: 92-117.
Furlong, E. J. “A Berkeleian Nod?” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978):
3.
_____. “Some Puzzles in Berkeley’s Writings.” Hermathena 120
(1976): 63-73.
_____. and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and The Ladies Library.”
Berkeley Newsletter
4 (1980): 4-13.
Ganson, Todd; and Ganson, Dorit. “Everyday Thinking about Bodily
Sensations.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2010),
523-34.
Garber, Daniel, and Ayers, Michael R., eds.
The Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
________, and Longuenesse, Béatrice (eds.). Kant and the Early
Moderns. Princeton University Press (2008).
Garcia Varas, Ana. “Ideas e imagenes: un estudio de la teoria de las
ideas abstractas en Hume.”
Revista de Filosofia
66 (2010): 93-106.
Garrett, Aaron. Berkeley's
Three dialogues : a reader's guide.
London ; New York : Continuum (2008).
Gatti, Andrea, Inglesi a Napoli nel viceregno austriaco: Joseph
Addison, Lord Shaftesbury, George Berkeley. Napoli: Vivarium,
Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2000.
_____, and Pugliese Carratelli,
G. “Per una storia intellettuale dell'eta Augustea in Inghilterra: Il
Catalogue della biblioteca di Joseph Addison.” Atti della Accademia
nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti Classe di scienze morali, storiche e
filologiche 14 (2003): 224-39.
Gaukroger, Stephen. “Picturability and Mathematical Ideals of
Knowledge.” In Clarke and Wilson, 338-60.
_____, ed. The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991.
Gaustad, Edwin S. “George Berkeley and the New World Community.”
Church History 48 (1979): 5-17.
_____. George Berkeley in America. New Haven and London: Yale
University Press, 1979.
_____. “When in the Course.” William and Mary Quarterly 52
(1995): 479-82.
Gersh, Stephen and Moran, Dermot, eds., Eriugena, Berkeley and the
Idealist Tradition. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame
Press, 2006.
Ghosh, Kuntal and Bhaumik, Kamales. “Complexity in human perception of
brightness: a historical review on the evolution of the philosophy of
visual perception.”
OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences
10 (2010): 17-35.
Gibson, Ann and Palmer, Lucia. “George Berkeley’s Visual Language and
the New England Portrait Tradition.” Centennial Review 31 (1987):
122-45.
Glasson, Travis. “‘Baptism
doth not bestow Freedom’: Missionary Anglicanism, Slavery, and the Yorke-Talbot
Opinion, 1701-30.” William & Mary Quarterly 67 (2010): 279-318.
Glauser, Richard. “Les rélations de significance chez Berkeley.”
Studia Philosophica
42 (1983): 165-200.
_____.
“Berkeley, Collier, et la distinction entre l’esprit fini et le corps.”
In Brykman (1997), 91-116.
_____. Berkeley et les philosophes du XVIIe siècle: perception et
scepticisme. Sprimont: Mardaga, 1999.
_____. “La structure de la perception médiate dans la théorie
berkeleyenne de la vision.” in Berlioz (2003), 103-34.
_____. “The Problem of the Unity of a Physical Object in Berkeley.” In
Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 50-81.
_____.
“Optique géométrique, images rétiniennes et corpuscules chez Berkeley.”
Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010),
7-18.
Glenney, Brian. “Adam
Smith and the Problem of the External World.”
Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (2011): 205-23.
Glezakos, Stavroula. “Comments on Melissa Frankel’s
‘Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley,
Meaning and Minds’.” Philosophia 37 (2009), 403-407.
Glombíček, Petr; and Hill, James. George Berkeley: průvodce jeho
filosofií.
Praha: Filosofia, 2009.
Glouberman, Mark. “Abstraction and Determinacy: the Ideological
Background of Berkeleianism.”
Idealistic Studies
(1982): 14-34.
_____. “Consciousness and Cognition: from Descartes to Berkeley.”
Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1982): 244-65.
_____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism: a Reply to Moked.” Iyyun: The
Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1991): 315-18.
_____. “Berkeley’s
Anti-abstractionism.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy
2 (1994): 145-63.
Gottenbarn, Donald. “Berkeley: God’s Pain.” Philosophical Studies
28 (1975): 245-54.
Gozzano, Simone. “Mental Images and Their Ontology.” Epistemologia
17 (1994): 225-52.
Graham, Jody. “Common Sense and Berkeley’s Perception by Suggestion.”
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1997): 397-423.
Grandi, Giovanni Battista. “Comments on Daniel E. Flage’s ‘Berkeley’s
Contingent Necessities.’” Philosophia 37 (2009), 373-78.
Granja, Dulce Maria. “Realismo et idealismo en Berkeley.”
Contrafuerte (1985): 19-27.
Gray, J. “Berkeley’s Theory of Space.” Journal of the History of
Philosophy 16 (1978): 415-34.
Grayling, Anthony C. Berkeley: the Central Arguments. London:
Duckworth, 1986.
_____. “Berkeley’s Argument for Immaterialism.” In Winkler (2005),
166-89.
Greco, John. “Reid’s Critique of Berkeley and Hume: What’s the Big
Idea?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1995):
279-96.
Greenberg, A. R. “Reid, Berkeley, and Notional Knowledge.”
Monist
61 (1978): 415-34.
Gruner, Rolf. “Berkeley
on General Ideas.” Dialogue 8 (1969): 481-85.
Grush, Rick.
“Berkeley
and the Spatiality of Vision.” Journal of the History of Philosophy
45 (2007): 413-42.
Grzeliński, Adam. “The Berkeleyan Conception of Nature.”
Вісник Національного авіаційного університету.
Філософія.
Культурологія"
Збірник наукових праць.
Київ
2 #12 (2010): 13-20.
_____. Człowiek i duch nieskończony. Immaterializm George’a Berkeleya
[The Man and the Infinite Spirit: The Immaterialism of George
Berkeley]. Toruń, Poland: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press,
2010.
Guérineau, Roselyne. “Berkeley et les Bermudes.” Revue philosophique
de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 309-17.
Gutiérrez,
Pedro Stepanenko. “La conception berkeleyana del yo.”
Analisis Filosofico
6 (1986): 13-22.
Hall, Richard A. S. “Did Berkeley Influence Edwards: Their Common
Critique of the Moral Sense Theory,” in Jonathan Edwards’s Writings,
ed. Stephen J. Stein. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996,
100-121.
Hall, Roland. “ ‘New Words in Berkeley’s Writings.”
Berkeley Newsletter
1 (1977): 4-8.
Hamou, Philippe. “Sens et fonction de modèle linguistique dans la
Nouvelle Théorie de la vision.” In Berlioz (2003), 47-78.
_____. “Microscopes et minima visuels. Berkeley critique de l’autopsie
instrumentale.” In Charles (2004), 103-26.
_____.
“L'optique des Voyages de Gulliver.” Revue d'histoire des
sciences 60 (2007): 25-45.
Hanson, Norwood Russell.
“The Dematerialization of Matter.” Philosophy of Science 29
(1962): 27-38.
Hanratty, Gerald. “A Voice in the Wilderness: Berkeley’s Response to
Enlightenment.”
Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
32 (1990): 319-37.
Hara, Kira. “Depth and Distance in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.”
History of Philosophy Quarterly
21 (2004): 101-17.
Hardwick, Charles. Berkeley and Peirce, Graduate Studies Texas
Tech. University (1981), 81-85.
Harman, Graham. “Realism
without Materialism.”
Substance: A Review of Theory & Literary Criticism
40 (2011): 52-72.
Harris, James. “Berkeley on the Inward Evidence of Freedom.”
In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 341-50.
Harris, Stephen.
“Berkeley’s Argument from Perceptual Relativity.” History of
Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1997): 99-120.
Hatfield, Gary. “The Cognitive Faculties.” In Garber (1998), 953-1002.
Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David. “A New Approach to Berkeley’s Ideal
Reality.” In Muehlmann (1995), 47-66.
_____ and _____. “On Allaire’s ‘Another Visit’.” In Muehlmann (1995),
39-46.
_____ and _____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Dilemma: Beyond the Incoherence
Model.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996): 221-38.
Hausman, David B. Descartes’s Legacy: Minds and Meaning in Early
Modern Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.
Häyry, Matti. “Passive Obedience and Berkeley’s Moral
Philosophy.” Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 3-14.
Häyry, Matti and Häyry, Hetta. “Obedience to Rules and Berkeley’s
Theological Utilitarianism.” Utilitas 6 (1994): 233-42.
Hendrix, John; Williams, Roger; Carman, Charles H. Renaissance
Theories of Vision. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2010.
Henze, D. F. “Descartes vs. Berkeley: a Study in Early Modern
Metaphilosophy.” Metaphilosophy 8 (1977): 147-63.
Hestevold, H. S. “Berkeley’s Theory of Time.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 7 (1990): 179-92.
Hibbs, Darren. “John
Scottus Eriugena on the Composition of Material Bodies.” British
Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 385-93.
Hight, Marc A. “Why We Do Not See What We Feel.” Pacific
Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002): 148-62.
_____. “Defending Berkeley’s Divine Ideas.” Philosophia 33
(2005): 97-128.
_____. “Berkeley's
Half-Way House.” Philosophy Compass 1(2006): 28-35.
_____. “Berkeley and
Bodily Resurrection.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45
(2007): 443-58.
_____. “Why My Chair
is Not Merely A Congeries: Berkeley and the Single Idea Thesis.” In
Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 82-107.
_____.
Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern
Metaphysics of Ideas. University Park:
Penn State University Press, 2008.
_____. “New Berkeley Correspondence: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 21
(2010), 16-21.
_____. “Berkeley’s Metaphysical Instrumentalism.” In Parigi (2010b),
15-29.
_____. “How Immaterialism Can Save Your Soul.” Revue Philosophique de
la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 109-22.
_____. “Berkeley on the Difference between Brutes and Men.”
In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),
207-22.
_____. “Preserving the Torments of Hell: Berkeleian Immaterialism and
the Afterlife.”
Science et Esprit
63 (2011): 179-92.
_____ and Bohannon, Joshua. “The Son More Visible: Immaterialism and the
Incarnation.” Modern Theology 26 (2010): 120-48.
_____. and Ott, Walter. “The New Berkeley.” Canadian Journal of
Philosophy 34 (2004): 1-24.
_____, ed. The Correspondence of George Berkeley. Cambridge:
University Press, 2013.
Hill, James. “The Synthesis of Empiricism and Innatism in Berkeley’s
Doctrine of Notions.” Berkeley Studies 21 (2010), 3-15.
Hill, Jonathan. “Gregory of Nyssa, Material Substance and Berkeleyan
Idealism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17
(2009): 653–83.
_____.
“Berkeley’s
Missing Argument: The Sceptical Attack on Intentionality.”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 47-77.
Hochschild, Joshua P.
“George Berkeley and a Theory of Analogy.” The Downside Review
122 (2004): 157-68.
Hoffmann, Yoel. “ ‘Dream-World’ Philosophers: Berkeley and Vasubandhu.”
Philosophy East-Philosophy West (1978): 247-68.
Hollingshead, G. “Bishop Berkeley and the Gloomy Clerk: Pope’s Final
Satire on Deism.” Durham University Journal (1982): 19-27.
Hollingshead, G. “Berkeley, Blackwell, and Blackwell’s Homer.”
Scottish Literary Journal 11 (1984): 20-35.
_____. “Pope, Berkeley, and the True Key to the Dunciad in Four
Books.” English Studies in Canada 10 (1984): 141-55.
_____. “The Case for Berkeley’s Authorship of The Vanity of
Philosophical Systems.” Eighteenth-Century Life 9 (1985):
51-64.
_____. “Sources for the Ladies’ Library.” Berkeley Newsletter
11 (1989/90): 1-9.
Holtzman, Matthew. “Berkeley on Common Sense, Theology, and Matter.”
Ph.D. dissertation: Johns Hopkins University, 2010.
_____. “Berkeley's Two Panaceas.”
Intellectual History Review 21
(2011): 473-95.
_____.
Review of Berkeley
et la chimie: Une philosophie pour la chimie au XVIIIe siècle
by Luc Peterschmitt. Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 40-45.
Hone, Joseph M. Bishop Berkeley: His Life, Writings, and Philosophy.
London: Faber & Faber, 1931.
Houghton, Raymond. “International Berkeley Society.” Berkeley
Newsletter 2 (1978): 14-15.
Howell, T. J. “The Bond of Society: Berkeley’s Theory of Social
Reality.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 16.
Hughes, M. “Hermes and Berkeley.” British Journal for the Philosophy
of Science 43 (1992): 1-19.
Hurley, Michael. “Berkeley and Methodism: a New Letter.”
Berkeley Newsletter
2 (1978): 1-2.
Ibañez, Alejandro Herrera. “La nocion de existencia en la ontologia de
Berkeley.”
Analisis Filosofico
6 (1986): 13-22.
Ichinose, Masaki. “Berkeley on Practical Spirit.” Philosophical
Studies 14 (1995): 1-17.
Ilodigwe, Damian. Berkeley: A Portrait. Newcastle: Cambridge
Scholars, 2010.
Imlay, Robert A. “Berkeley and Scepticism: a Fatal Dalliance.” Hume
Studies 18 (1992): 501-10.
_____. “Berkeley and Action.” In Muehlmann (1995), 171-82.
Isermann, Michael M. “George
Berkeley’s Language of Vision and the Occult Tradition of Linguistic
Platonism. Part II: George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and Linguistic
Platonism.” Language & Communication 28
(2008): 57.
Jacob, Alexander. “The Neoplatonic Conception of Nature in More,
Cudworth and Berkeley.” In Gaukroger (1991).
Jacovides, Michael. “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive.”
Philosophia 37 (2009): 415-29.
_____. “Remarks on Smalligan Marušić’s Comments.”Philosophia 37
(2009), 437-39.
Jacquette, Dale. “Berkeley’s Continuity Argument for the Existence of
God.” Journal of Religion 65 (1985): 1-14.
_____. “Reconciling Berkeley’s Microscopes in God’s Infinite Mind.”
Religious Studies
29 (1993): 453-63.
_____.
Review of A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George
Berkeley by John R. Roberts. Faith and Philosophy 28 (2011):
468-72.
Jaffro, Laurent. “Sensation et imagination. Berkeley et la ‘différence
perçue’.” In Ressemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme
britannique, dir. G. Brykman, université Paris 10-Nanterre,
Le Temps philosophique 6 (1999), 71-91.
_____. “La
paideia selon Berkeley et Shaftesbury. Un conflit dans la conception
thérapeutique de la philosophie.” In La philosophie comme médecine de
l’âme à l’âge classique, dir. G. Brykman, Université Paris
10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 9 (2003), 147-73.
_____. “Le cogito de Berkeley.” Archives de philosophie 67
(2004): 85-111.
_____. “Berkeley’s Criticism of Shaftesbury’s Moral Theory in
Alciphron III.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007),
199-213.
_____.
“L’évidence de l’existence d’autrui est-elle un modèle pour la
connaissance de Dieu? Berkeley, Hume, Reid, et l' ‘argument irrégulier.’”
HAL – CCSD (2010).
_____. “Ėducation moderne et tradition antique selon Berkeley.” In
Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 277-86.
_____.
“Ist die Evidenz der Existenz des Anderen ein Modell für die
Gotteserkenntnis?
Berkeley,
Hume, Reid und das ‘Argument des Irregulären’.”
Aufklärung:
Interdisziplinäres Jahrbuch zur Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts und
seiner Wirkungsgeschichte
21 (2009): 51-74.
Jaffro, Laurent; Brykman, Geneviève; Schwartz, Claire, eds.
Berkeley’s
Alciphron. English Text and Essays in Interpretation. Hildesheim:
Olms, 2010.
_____. “ ‘Reid said the business, but Berkeley did it.’
Ferrier interprète de l’immatérialisme.” Revue Philosophique de la
France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 135-49.
Jakapi, Roomet. Berkeley, Mysteries, and Meaning: a Critique of the
Non-Cognitivist Interpretation. Ph. D. diss., University of Tartu.
Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2002.
_____. “Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s
Alciphron.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10
(2002): 401-11.
_____. “Faith, Truth, Revelation and Meaning in Berkeley’s Defence of
the Christian Religion (in Alciphron)”, The Modern Schoolman
80 (2002): 23-34.
_____. “Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and
‘Non-Cognitive’ Propositions in Scripture.”
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
85 (2003): 86-90.
_____. “Was Berkeley a Utilitarian?” In Lemetti and Piirimäe (2007),
53-68.
_____. “Berkeley and the Separate State of the Soul: A Note.”
Berkeley Studies 18 (2007): 24-28.
_____. “Christian Mysteries and Berkeley’s Alleged Non-Cognitivism.” In
Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007): 188-98.
_____. “Berkeley’s Defence of the Scripture in Alciphron VI.”
In
Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 353-56.
Jesseph, Douglas M., ed., George Berkeley, De Motu and The
Analyst. A Modern Edition with Introductions and Commentary.
Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academy, 1992.
_____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1993.
_____. “Berkeley, God, and Explanation.” In Mercer and O’Neill (2005),
183-206.
_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Winkler (2005),
266-310.
_____. “Faith and Fluxions: Berkeley on Theology and Mathematics.” In
Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 247-60.
Jessop, T. E. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.”
Journal of Theological Studies 9 (1958): 197-98.
Jolley, Nicholas. “Berkeley and Malebranche on Causality and Volition.”
In Cover (1990), 227-44.
_____. “Berkeley, Malebranche, and Vision in God.” Journal of the
History of Philosophy 34 (1996): 535-48.
Jones, Nick. Starting with Berkeley. London: Continuum, 2009.
Jones, Tom. Pope and Berkeley: the Language of Poetry and Philosophy.
Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
_____. “George Berkeley
and Thomas Secker: A Note.”
Berkeley Newsletter
17 (2006), 14-19.
_____. Review of ‘We Irish’ in Europe: Yeats, Berkeley & Joseph Hone
by W. J. Mc Cormack. Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 51-53.
Kabitoglou, E, Douka.
“On the Discrimination of Platonisms in Eighteenth Century England.”
Philosophical Inquiry 15 (1993): 20-45.
Kail, P. J. E. “Causation, Fictionalism and Non-Cognitivism: Berkeley
and Hume.” In Parigi (2010b), 31-40.
_____. “Berkeley, the Ends of Language, and the Principles of Human
Knowledge.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107
(2009): 265-78.
Kamio,
Mitsuo. “The Semantics of Perception: A Romantic Phrase of the
Consciousness.” Journal of the School of Letters 4 (2008): 13-35.
Karásek, Jindrich. “Mind and the Other [in Czech].” Filosoficky
Casopis 57 (2009), 61-69.
Kasam, A. “Can Berkeley Be Called an Imagist?” Indian Philosophical
Quarterly 6 (1989): 75-88.
Kassavine, Illia. “Berkeley Revisited: on the New Metaphysics for Social
Epistemology. 90 Years after Materialism and Empiriocriticism.”
Epistemologia 19 (1996): 157-74.
Kearney, John. “Thought, Language and Meaning in Berkeley’s Philosophy.”
The New Scholasticism 49 (1975): 480-94.
Kearney, Richard. “Berkeley and the Irish Mind.” Études irlandaises
(1986): 7-25.
Keefe, Jenny. “The Return to Berkeley.” British Journal for the
History of Philosophy 15 (2007), 101-13.
Kelly, Patrick. “Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s
Querist [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14.
_____. “Berkeley and Money: Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in
Berkeley’s Querist.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 101-16.
_____. “Berkeley and Ireland.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25.
_____. “Berkeley’s Servants.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96):
13-14.
_____. “Berkeley’s Economic Writings.” In Winkler (2005), 339-68.
Kennedy, Máire. “Reading the Enlightenment.in Eighteenth-Century
Ireland.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 45 (2012): 355-78.
Keynes, Geoffrey. “Samuel Johnson and Bishop Berkeley.” The Book
Collector (1981): 177-81.
Kijaczko, Stanislaw.
Immaterializm: epistemologia I metafizyka: próba interpretacij filozofii
George’a Berkeleya.
Opole: Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2002.
Kingston, F. Temple. The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753:
Irish Philosopher. Lewiston: Mellen, 1992.
Klaas van Berkel, Klaas and Vanderjagt, Arjo, eds., The Book of
Nature in Modern Times. Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2005.
Klein, Lawrence E. “Berkeley, Shaftesbury and the Meaning of
Politeness.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 16 (1986):
57-68.
Klemme, Heiner F.
“Causality.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century
Philosophy, ed. Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2006,
vol. 1, 368-88.
_____.
“Substances and Modes, Space and Time.” In The Cambridge History of
Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, ed, Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2006,
vol. 1, 343-67.
Kline, David A. “Berkeley’s
Theory of Common Sense.” International Studies in Philosophy 19
(1987): 21-31.
_____. “Berkeley’s Divine Language Argument.” In Berman (1993), 185-99.
Koetsier, Teun and Bergmans, Luc, eds., Mathematics and the Divine. A
Historical Study. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.
Kohlenberg, Philip. “Bishop Berkeley on Religion and the Church.”
Harvard Theological Review 66 (1973): 219-36.
Kohler Ryan, Renee. “De profundis clamavi ad te Domine: The
Existential Significance of Depth for Berkeley, Merleau-Ponty and
Desmond.”
Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005:
237-53.
Kopper, Joachim. Das Unbezügliche als Offenbarsein: Besinnung auf das
philosophische Denken.
Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004.
Kroustallis,
Basileios. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 21 (2004): 151-66.
Ksenjek, Ekaterina Y. and Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley, the Author of
Nature, and the Judeo-Christian God.” History of Philosophy Quarterly
29 (2012): 281-300.
Kulenkampff, Arend. George Berkeley. München: Beck, 1987.
_____. Esse est percipi. Untersuchungen zur Philosophie George
Berkeleys.
Basel: Schwabe, 2001.
Kupfer, Joseph. “Universalization in Berkeley’s Rule-Utilitarianism.”
Revue internationale de philosophie 28 (1974): 511-31.
Kuznetsova, Irina. “Utpaladeva’s
Conception of Self in the Context of the Ᾱtmavāda-Anātmavada Debate and
in Comparison with Western Theological Idealism.
Philosophy East & West
62
(2012): 339-58.
Lambert, Richard. “Berkeley’s Use of the Relativity Argument.”
Idealistic Studies (1980): 107-21.
_____. “The Literal Intent of Berkeley’s Dialogues.”
Philosophy and Literature 6 (1982): 165-70.
Lamers, Robert.
“Berkeley and Schopenhauer.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (1981):
120-43.
Leary, David E. “Berkeley’s Social Theory: Context and Development.”
Journal of the History of Ideas
38 (1977): 635-49.
Lebrun, G. “Berkeley ou le sceptique malgré lui.” Manuscrito 11
(1988): 33-48.
Leduc-Fayette, Denise. “Qu’est-ce que ‘parler aux yuex’? Berkeley et le
‘langage optique’.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
4 (1997): 409-27.
Lee, R. N. “What Berkeley’s Notions Are.”
Idealistic Studies
20 (1990): 19-41.
Lee, Sukjae. “Berkeley on the Activity of Spirits.” British Journal
for the History of Philosophy 20 (2012): 539-76.
Le
Jallé, Ėléonore. “Mandeville dans l’Alciphron.”
In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 297-308.
Lemetti, Juhana and Piirimäe, Eva, eds. Human Nature as the Basis of
Morality and Society in Early Modern Philosophy. Acta Philosophica
Fennica 83. Helsinki: Philosophical Society of Finland, 2007.
Lennon, Thomas M. “Berkeley and the Ineffable.” Syntheses 75
(1988): 231-50.
_____. “George Berkeley and the Act-Object Distinction.” Dialogue
40 (2001): 651-67.
_____. “The Significance of the Barrovian Case”, Studies in the
History and Philosophy of Science 38 (2007): 36-55.
_____. “The Genesis of Berkeley's Theory of Vision Vindicated”
History of European Ideas 33 (2007), 321-29.
____. “The Historical Consistency of Berkeley’s Idealism.” British
Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 101-24.
_____.
“The
Main Part and Pillar of Berkeley’s Theory: Idealism and Perceptual
Heterogeneity.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011):
91-115.
Lavine, Michael. “How to Make a Mistake.” Philosophia 22 (1993):
29-37.
Levin, David Michael, ed. Sites of Vision. Cambridge, Ma: MIT
Press, 1997.
Levin, Janet. “Molyneux
Meets Euthyphro: Does Cross-Modal Transfer Require Rational Transition?”
Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2008): 289-97.
Levin, Yakir. “Idealism
and Relativism: Locke, Berkeley, Kant, and Wittgenstein” [in Hebrew].
Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2010): 128-42.
Levine, Michael. “Berkeley’s Theocentric Mentalism: Pantheism?”
Sophia (1987): 30-41.
_____ and Levi, Neil. “Robinson on Berkeley: ‘Bad Faith’ or Naive
Idealism?” Idealistic Studies 22 (1992): 163-78.
Levy, David M. “Bishop Berkeley Exorcises the Infinite: Fuzzy
Consequences of Strict Finitism.” Hume Studies 18 (1992): 511-36.
_____. “ ‘Magic Buffalo’ and Berkeley’s ‘Theory of Vision’: Learning in
Society.”
Hume Studies
19 (1993): 223-26.
Leyvraz, Jean-Pierre. “La notion de Dieu chex Berkeley.” Revue de
theologie et de philosophie (1980): 241-52.
Lievers, Menno. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of
Philosophy 30 (1992): 399-416.
Llamas-Gómez, Clara Isabel. “Introduction to ‘Berkeley’s Crossroads’.”
Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 1-4.
Lloyd, Peter B. Consciousness and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London:
Ursa, 1999.
_____.
Paranormal Phenomena and Berkeley’s Metaphysics.
London: Ursa, 1999.
Lord, S. K. “Berkeleian Linguistics.” Linguistics 213 (1978):
5-28.
Louet, D. “La critique de l’absolutisme newtonien chez Leibniz et
Berkeley.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 93 (1988): 447-68.
Lowe, E. J. Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Lucash, Frank S. “The Nature of Mind.” Giornale di Metafisica 13
(1991): 89-107.
Luce, A. A. “Berkeley and the Living Thing.” Hermathena 123
(1977): 19-25.
Luce, J. V. “Yale College and the Acquisition of Whitehall.”
Berkeley Newsletter
15 (1997/98): 19-22.
Lutterfelds, Wilhelm. “Kant oder Berkeley? Zum aktuellen Streit um den
korrecten Realismus.”
Perspektiven der Philosophie
22 (1996): 305-40.
Lyons, William. “Dysart Castle: George Berkeley’s Childhood Home.”
Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 11-15.
Mahon, James Edwin. “Review of The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy
by Peter Walmsley.”
Berkeley Newsletter
14 (1995/96): 15-17.
Maia Neto, José R. “Academic Skepticism in Early Modern Philosophy.”
Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1997): 199-220.
Malherbe, Michel. “Husserl
critique de Berkeley.”
Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
(1986): 355-66.
Malherbe, Michel. “La critique husserlienne des idées abstraites selon
Berkeley.”
History of European Ideas
7 (1986): 623-32.
Mall, Ram Adhar. Der operative Begriff des Geistes: Locke, Berkeley,
Hume.
Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1984.
Mancino, Michele. “Il Mezzogiorno nei diari (1717) del ‘Viaggio in
Italia’ di George Berkeley.” In Atti delle giornate di studio: Il
turismo culturale in Campania.
Napoli, Quaderni dell’Università degli studi “Federico II”, 2004,
271-304.
Mandal, Nathaniel. Idee und Intention. Die Ideen- beziehungsweise
Bedeutungstheorie John Lockes und ihre Wiederbelebung in der Theorie der
Sprecherbedeutung bei Paul Grice. Munich: Grin Verlag, 2010.
_____. Qualitäten der Wahrnehmung. Lockes Unterscheidung zwischen
Qualitäten primärer und sekundärer Art und Berkeleys
Immaterialismuseinwand. Munich:
Grin Verlag, 2010.
Marciano, Bruno. George Berkeley. Estetica e idealismo. Genova:
Nova Scripta, 2010.
Martinello, Francesco.
“Direzioni del moto e direzioni nello spazio: Berkeley e Kant.”
Rivista di Filosofia
102 (2011): 105-23.
Mathauser, Zdenek. “The Theory of Reflection in Aesthetics and the
Heritage of George Berkeley.” (in Czechoslovakian), Estetika 11
(1974): 30-52.
Mattey, G. J. “Kant’s Conception of Berkeley’s Idealism.” Kantstudien
74 (1983): 161-75.
McCracken, Charles J. “What Does Berkeley’s God See in the Quad?”
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
61 (1979): 280-92.
_____. Malebranche and British Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 1983.
_____. “Berkeley’s Conception of Idea [Abstract].” Berkeley
Newsletter 8 (1985): 14-16.
_____. “Berkeley’s Notion of Spirit.” History of European Ideas 7
(1986): 597-602.
_____. “Stages on a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism.” Journal of the
History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 19-40.
_____. “Berkeley’s Cartesian Concept of Mind: the Return Through
Malebranche and Locke to Descartes.” Monist 71 (1988): 596-611.
_____. “Berkeley on the Relation of Ideas to the Mind.” In Cummins and
Zoeller (1992), 187-200.
_____. “Godless Immaterialism: on Atherton’s Berkeley.” In Muehlmann
(1995), 249-60.
_____. “Demons that Deceive, Gods that Perceive, and the Limits of
Skepticism.” In Brykman (1997), 73-89.
_____. “Knowledge of the Existence of Bodies.” In Garber (1998), 624-48.
_____. “George Berkeley.” In Companion to Early Modern Philosophy,
ed. Steven Nadler. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, 437-55.
_____. “Berkeley’s Realism.” In Daniel, New Interpretations
(2007), 23-44.
_____ and Tipton, Ian, eds., Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues:
Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2000.
_____.
“Leibniz and Berkeley on Body.” In
Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 175-92.
McDonough, Jeffrey K. “Berkeley,
Human Agency and Divine Concurrentism.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 567-90.
McGowan, William. “The Dream of Ezra Stiles: Bishop Berkeley’s Haunting
of New England.” Studies in Eighteenth- Century Culture (1982):
181-98.
McGowan, William. “Did Berkeley Write The Irish Blasters?”
Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 1-4.
_____. “George Berkeley’s American Declaration of Independence.”
Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 12 (1983): 105-13.
_____. “Berkeley Kicking His Own Stones.” Indian Philosophical
Quarterly 16 (1989): 81-102.
McIntyre, J. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.”
Scottish Journal of Theology 15 (1962): 420-23.
McKim, Robert. “Wenz on Abstract Ideas and Christian Neoplatonism in
Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Ideas (1982): 665-71.
_____. “The Entries in Berkeley’s Notebooks: a Reply to Bertil Belfrage.”
Hermathena 139 (1985): 156-61.
_____. “Luce’s Account of the Development of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.”
Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (1987): 649-69.
_____. “Review of Theodore Young: Completing Berkeley’s Project:
Classical vs. Modern Philosophy.” Berkeley Newsletter 10
(1987/88): 13-16.
_____. “What Is Berkeley’s God Doing in the Quad?” Philosophy
Research Archives 13 (1987/88): 637-53.
_____. “Review of Ernest Sosa, Essays on the Philosophy of George
Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 28-32.
_____. “Berkeley on Private Ideas and Public Objects.” In Cummins and
Zoeller (1992), 215-33.
_____. “Abstraction and Immaterialism: Recent Interpretations.”
Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 1-13.
_____. “Berkeley’s Notebooks.” In Winkler (2005), 63-93.
McKinnon, Rhys. “Dismantling the Straw Man: An Analysis of the Arguments
of Hume and Berkeley Against Locke’s Doctrine of Abstract Ideas.”
Sorites: An International Electronic Magazine of Analytical Philosophy. 16
(2005), 38-45.
McRae, Robert. “’Idea’ as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth
Century.” Journal of the History of Ideas 26 (1965): 175-90.
Meattini, Valerio. “Berkeley e l’Italia.” Critica storica 19
(1982): 3-21.
Mel’vil’, I. K. And Sushko, S. A. “Argument Doktora Dzhonsona: Semiuel
Dzhonson kak kritik Berkli.” Voprosy Filosofii 3 (1981): 133-44.
Menichelli, Caterina. “Was Berkeley A Spinozist? A Historiographical
Answer (1718-1751).” In Parigi (2010b), 171-88.
Mensch, Jennifer.
“Kant and the Problem of Idealism: On the Significance of the Göttingen
Review.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2006): 297-317.
Mercer, Christia and
O’Neill, Eileen, eds. Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and
Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Migely, Geneviève.
“Berkeley’s Actively Passive Mind.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley
(2007), 153-71.
Mirarchi, L. A. “Force and Absolute Motion in Berkeley’s Philosophy of
Physics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 705-13.
_____. “A Rejoinder to Bruce Silver’s Reply.” Journal of the History
of Ideas 38 (1977): 716-18.
Moked, Gabriel. Particles and Ideas: Berkeley’s Corpuscularian
Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
Moked, Gabriel. “A Note on Berkeley’s Anti-Abstractionism.” Iyyun
40 (1991): 95-99.
_____. “Two Central Issues in Bishop Berkeley’s ‘Corpuscularian
Philosophy’ in the Siris.” History of European Ideas 7
(1986): 643-49.
Montero, B. H. “La realidad en Kant y Berkeley.”
Revista de Filosofia de la Universidad de Costa Rica
23 (1985): 49-69.
Monti, Maria Teresa. “Theories ‘providentialistes’ de la vision.
Chirurgiens et philosophes entre Berkeley et Molyneux.” in
Wissenschaften und Musik unter dem Einfluß einer sich ändernden
Geisteshaltung, edited by M. Büttner.
Bochum: Universitätsverlag N. Brockmeyer, 1992, 69-76.
_____. “’Scrittura’ e ‘commento’: il codice berkeleiano della
percezione. Problemi medici e teorie filosofiche.” In
L’interpretazione nei secoli XVI e XVII , edited by Guido Canziani
and Yves-Charles Zarka. Milano: F. Angeli, 1993, 387-406.
_____, ed., Teorie della visione e problemi di percezione visiva
nell’età moderna.
Milano: Franco Angeli, 1995.
_____. “Isomorphisme, signes naturals et “prophéties”: les suggestions
de Descartes et les solutions de Berkeley.”
In Brykman (1997), 117-48.
de Montluzin, Emily Lorraine. “Attributions of Authorship in the
Gentleman’s Magazine, 1731-36: A Supplement to the Union List.”
A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews 21
(2008): 11-24.
Mooney, Timothy. “Irish Cartesian and Proto-Phenomenologist: The Case of
Berkeley.” Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005:
213-36.
Moore, Sean D. “Introduction: Ireland and the Enlightenment.”
Eighteenth-Century Studies 45 (2012): 345-54.
Moreau, J. “Berkeley et le schématisme.”
Kantstudien
79 (1988): 286-92.
Morgan, Vance. “Kant
and Dogmatic Idealism: A Defence of Kant’s Refutation of Berkeley.”
Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (1993): 217-37.
Morris, David. “Optical Idealism and the Languages of Depth in Descartes
and Berkeley.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (1997): 363-92.
Mourant, John A. “Berkeley and Religious Language.” In Explanation.
The Hague: Nijhoff, 1973, 73-88.
Muehlmann, Robert G. “Berkeley’s Ontology and the Epistemology of
Idealism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1978): 89-111.
_____. “The Role of Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Philosophy.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 397-425.
_____. Berkeley’s Ontology. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.
_____, ed., Berkeley’s Metaphysics. Structural, Interpretive, and
Critical Essays. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Press, 1995.
_____. “Berkeley’s Problem of Sighted Agency.” In Muehlmann (1995),
149-70.
_____. “The Substance of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Muehlmann (1995),
89-106.
_____. “Strong and Weak Heterogeneity in Berkeley’s New Theory of
Vision.”
In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 121-44.
Mugnai, Paolo F. Segno e linguaggio in George Berkeley. Roma: ed.
dell’Ateneo, 1979.
Mun Seong-Hwa.
Berkeley und Hegel: eine Untersuchung zur logischen Dingkonstitution und
zur dialektischen Bewußtseinsdeskription.
Ph. D. diss.,
University of Düsseldorf, 1997.
Munoa Roiz, J. L. “George Berkeley (1685-1753) (II).”
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología
82 (2007): 121-22.
Murray,
Patrick. “Berkeley and Money: Money, Wealth, and Berkeley’s Doctrine of
Signs: a Reply to Patrick Kelly.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 152-56.
Nadler, Steven. “Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Quality
Distinction.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1990): 47-61.
_____, ed. Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park:
Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993.
_____.
A
Companion to Early Modern Philosophy.
Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008.
Nanavati, Shaun. “A
history and experimental analysis of the moon illusion.”
The New
School Psychology Bulletin
6.
Neri, Luigi. “’Filling the World with a Mite’: un paradosso
dell’infinita divisibilità negli scritti giovanili di George Berkeley.”
Rivista di filosofia 71 (1980): 67-97.
_____. “Esperienza, metafisica e geometria nel pensiero di Berkeley.”
Rivista di filosofia 76 (1985): 239-67.
_____. “Il caso Siris, ovvero la ‘seconda filosofia’ di George
Berkeley vescovo di Cloyne.” Giornale critico della filosofia
italiana (1990): 320-41.
_____. George Berkeley. Filosofia e critica dei linguaggi scientifici.
Bologna: CLUEB, 1991.
_____. “Fenomenismo e
realismo in George Berkeley.” Giornale Critico della Filosofia
Italiana 3 (2005): 470-94.
Newburgh, R. “Did Berkeley foreshadow Mach?” American Journal of
Physics 76 (2008): 189-190.
Nezinska, E. “To Make Truth Glide Into the Soul [in Czechoslovakian].”
Filozofia 47 (1992): 310-12.
Nielsen, Harry. “A Categorical Difficulty in Berkeley.” Philosophy
Research Archives (1980).
Nols, Carmen.
Zeichenhafte Wirklichkeit : Realität als Ausdruck der kommunikativen
Präsenz Gottes in der Theologie George Berkeleys.
Mohr Siebeck, 2012.
Nomura, Tomokiyo. “Recovering Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the
Anglo-Irish Context.”
Eighteenth-Century Studies
45 (2012): 455-57.
Norton-Smith, T. M. “Sending an Irishman ‘Realing’: Constructive Realism
and George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Arithmetic.” Midwest Quarterly
42 (2001): 199-211.
Nuchelmans, G. “Berkeleys
betekenisleer.”
Wijsgerig perspectief
26 (1985-86).
Nurock, Vanessa. “La conscience morale selon Berkeley.” In Jaffro,
Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 319-30.
Oaklander, L. N. “The Inherence Interpretation of Berkeley: a Critique.”
Modern Schoolman 54 (1977): 261-69.
Oakes, Jason Benjamin. In Him We Live and Move and Have Our Being:
Philosophical Theology in Nicolas Malebranche and George Berkeley.
Ph. D. dissertation: University of Oklahoma, 2009.
Oakes, Robert A. “God and Physical Objects.” International Journal of
the Philosophy of Religion 9 (1978): 16-29.
O’Callaghan, John P. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: Toward
a More Perfect Form of Existence. Notre Dame, IN: University of
Notre Dame Press, 2003.
Oekerijee, S. K. “Descartes, Berkeley, and the External World.”
Indian Philosophical Quarterly 23 (1996): 77-93.
Oertel, Hans Joachim.
George Berkeley und die englische Literatur.
Unveränd. Reprogr. Nachdr. D. 1 Aufl., Halle a. d. Saale: Niemeyer 1934
(Walluf bei Wiesbaden: Sändig, 1973).
O'Gorman, Frank and Donald, Diana, eds., Ordering the World in the
Eighteenth Century. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
O’Grady, Paul. “Review of Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst:
a Modern Edition with Introductions and Commentary. Edited by Douglas M.
Jesseph.” Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 4-8.
O’Higgins, J. “Browne and King, Collins and Berkeley: Agnosticism or
Anthropomorphism?” Journal of Theological Studies 27 (1976):
88-112.
Olscamp, Paul.
Some Suggestions about the Moral Philosophy of George Berkeley.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.
Olszewski, Mikołaj. George Berkeley:
Alkifron. Kęty:
Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki, 2008.
Ong-Van-Cung, Kim Sang, ed. La voie des idées? Le statut de la
représentation XVIIè-XXè siècles. Paris: CNRS éditions, 2006.
Orlando, Eleonora. “Sobre el idealismo de Berkeley.” Revista de
Filosofia 7 (1992): 53-68.
Ott, Walter.
“The Cartesian Context of Berkeley’s Attack on Abstraction.” Pacific
Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2004): 407-24.
_____. “Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: the Fourth Distinction.”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2006): 437-50.
_____. Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy.
Oxford: Oxford University Press (2009).
Pabst, Manfred.
Berkeley, Joyce, Beckett: Reflexionen und Interpretationen.
Wiesbaden: Volkshochschule Wiesbaden e. V., 1997.
Pappas, George. “Ideas, Minds and Berkeley.”
American Philosophical Quarterly
(1980): 181-94.
_____. “Adversary Metaphysics.” Philosophy Research Archives 9
(1983): 571-86.
_____. “Abstract Ideas and the Esse is Percipi Thesis.”
Hermathena 139 (1985): 47-62.
_____. “Abstract Ideas and Unperceived Existent Sensible Objects
[Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 16.
_____. “Science and Metaphysics in Berkeley.” International Studies
in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1987): 105-14.
_____. “Berkeley and Common Sense Realism.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 8 (1991): 27-42.
_____. “Berkeleian Idealism and Impossible Performances.” In Muehlmann
(1995), 127-48.
_____. “The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753.” International
Studies in Philosophy 29 (1997): 126-27.
_____. “Berkeley and Scepticism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research 59 (1999): 133-49.
_____. Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca and London: Cornell University
Press, 2000.
_____. “Les idées abstraites et la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” In
Charles (2004), 37-58.
_____. “Berkeley’s Assessment of Locke’s Epistemology.” In Daniel,
Reexamining Berkeley (2007),
29-49.
_____. “Certainty and Knowledge of Objects in Berkeley.”
In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),
275-86.
Parigi, Silvia.
“George Berkeley e l’illusione
lunare.” Rivista di storia della scienza 4 (1987): 51-60.
_____. “La quaestio di Barrow: un’aporia della visione tramite
lenti.” Nuncius 3 (1988): 65-69.
_____. “Il problema di Molyneux: avventure filosofiche di ciechi,
neonati e di alcuni animali.”
BioLogica
4 (1990): 171-207.
_____. “’The Horse Is in the Stable, the Books are in the Study as
Before’: appunti per una storia della storiografia berkeleiana.”
Bollettino filosofico dell’Università della Calabria
9 (1991): 113-34.
_____. “I filosofi e il microscopio: da Descartes a Berkeley.”
Rivista di storia della scienza 1 (1993): 155-72.
_____. Il mondo visibile. George Berkeley e la ‘perspectiva’.
Firenze: Olschki, 1995.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Opere filosofiche Torino: UTET,
1996.
_____. “Is There a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism?”
In Brykman (1997), 23-48.
_____. “Caverne, terremoti, fossili e vulcani negli Scritti di storia
naturale di George Berkeley.” In Segni e percorsi della modernità,
edited by Ferdinando Abbri and Marco Segala. Arezzo: Università degli
studi di Siena, 2000, 77-105.
_____. “Teoria e storia del problema di Molyneux.” Laboratorio
dell’ISPF 1 (2004):
www.ispf.cnr.it/ispf-lab.
_____. “Review: Kenneth P. Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to
Berkeley.”
Philosophy in Review
27 (2007): 407-409.
_____.
Spiriti, effluvi, attrazioni. La fisica curiosa dal Rinascimento al
Secolo dei Lumi.
Napoli: Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2010a.
_____, ed. George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of
Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.
_____. “Scire per causas Versus scire per signa: George
Berkeley and Scientific Explanation in Siris.”
In Parigi (2010b), 107-19.
_____. “Lo spirito etereo e l’acqua di catrame.”
In
Parigi (2010a), 248-51.
_____. “Siris
and the Renaissance: Some Overlooked Berkeleian Sources.”
Revue Philosophique
de la France et de l’Ėtranger
135 (2010): 151-62.
Park, Désirée. Complementary Notions: a Critical Study of Berkeley’s
Theory of Concepts. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1972.
_____. “Notions: the Counter-Poise of the Berkeleyan Ideas.”
Giornale di Metafisica 12 (1981): 243-65.
_____. “Prior and Williams on Berkeley.” Philosophy (1981):
231-41.
_____. “Supplement to the Editor’s Introduction to the Philosophical
Commentaries.” In The Works of George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne,
ed.
A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop. Nendeln, Lichtenstein: Kraus Reprint, 1982.
_____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Anselm’s Argument.” Anselm Studies
1 (1983): 103-9.
_____. “Facts and Reasons Concerning Berkeley’s Reprinted Works.”
Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 14-16.
_____. “The Berkeleyan Scheme of Things and Some Consequences.”
Giornale di Metafisica
19 (1988): 17-41.
Patey, Douglas.
“Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Kicking the Stone Again.”
Journal of the History of Ideas
47 (1986): 139-47.
Pearce, Kenneth L. “The Semantics of Sense Perception in Berkeley.”
Religious Studies
44 (2008): 249-68.
Perler, Dominik; and Haag, Johannes. Ideen. Reprasentationalismus in
der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin, New York: Walter De Gruyter, 2010.
Pessin, Andrew. Uncommon Sense: the Strangest Ideas from the Smartest
Philosophers. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2012.
Peters, Joseph Etienne. Language and Vision in the Writings of
Jonathan Swift and George Berkeley. Ph. D. dissertation: Leeds,
2010.
Peterschmitt, Luc. “La critique du réalisme leibnizien dans le De
Motu de Berkeley.” Astérion (asterion.revues.org) 1 (2003):
112-26.
_____. “Berkeley et les hypothèses mathématiques.” Archives
internationales d´histoire des sciences 150-151 (2003): 184-97.
_____. Sciences de la nature et philosophie dans la pensée de
Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., Université Lille 3, 2005.
_____.
“Can
Berkeley Be an Instrumentalist? Towards a Reappraisal of Berkeley’s
Philosophy of Science.”
Berkeley Studies
19 (2008): 19-31.
_____. “Berkeley and Chemistry in the Siris. The Rebuilding of a
Non-Existent Theory.”
In Parigi (2010b), 73-85.
_____. “Un impensé des principes de la connaissance humaine: la physique
mathématique.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger
135 (2010), 19-29.
_____. “L’aspect formel du langage de la physique dans l’Alciphron.”
In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 413-22.
_____. “Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision: Science or Metaphysics?” In
Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 15-33.
_____. “Quelle preuve de l’existence de quel Dieu? À propos de la
‘demonstration de l’existence de Dieu’ dans Alciphron IV.”
Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 193-204.
Philipse, H. “Leidt consequentie altijd naar de duivel? Een analyse van
de argumentatie voor Berkeleys immaterialisme.” Wijsgerig perspectief
(1985-86).
Phillips, Mariléne. “Berkeley sur la volonté: Quelques ‘notes
philosophiques’.”
Revue internationale de philosophie
39 (1985):
252-58.
_____. “L’actualité et l’immaterialisme de Berkeley.” Revue
philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 373-76.
_____. “On Translating Berkeley’s Principles.”
History of European Ideas
7 (1986): 609-16.
Piper, William Bowman. “Kant’s Contact with British Empiricism.”
Eighteenth-Century Studies 12 (1978/79): 174-89.
Pitcher, George. Berkeley. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.
_____. “Berkeley on the Perception of Objects.” Journal of the
History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 99-105.
_____. Berkeley on Vision: a Nineteenth-Century Debate. New York:
Garland, 1988.
_____, ed., The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York: Garland,
1988-1989, 15 vols.
Popkin, Richard H., ed., Scepticism in the History of Philosophy: a
Pan-American Dialogue.
Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.
Porter, Noah. Two-hundredth Birthday of Bishop George Berkeley
[1885]. Reprint. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger, 2010.
Priest, Stephen.
The British Empiricists: Hobbes to Ayer.
London: Penguin, 1990.
Printz, Amanda Lewis.
The Scope and Significance of
George Berkeley's Language Model.
Ph. D. Dissertation: University of Southern California, 2007.
Pritchard, Timothy. “Meaning, Signification, and Suggestion: Berkeley on
General Words.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (2012):
301-317.
Pucelle, Jean. “Berkeley a-t-il été influencé par Malebranche?”
Etudes philosophiques
1 (1979): 19-38.
Pycior, H. M. “Mathematics and Philosophy: Wallis, Hobbes, Barrow, and
Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (1987): 265-86.
Quintanilla Navarro, Ignacio. George Berkeley (1685-1753).
Madrid: Ediciones del Orto, 1995.
_____. Materia y sentido en George Berkeley. Universidad
Complutense de Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones Contribuidor Rábade
Romeo, Sergio Fecha de Publicación (2002).
Rabate, Jean-Michel. “Berkeley entre Joyce et Beckett.” Études
irlandaises 11 (1986): 57-76.
Radcliffe, Elizabeth S., and McCarty, Richard ; with Allhoff, Fritz and
Vaidya, Anand Jayprakash, eds. Late Modern Philosophy: Essential
Readings with Commentary. Malden, MA Oxford: Blackwell,
2007.
Raiger, Michael Kenneth. Coleridge, Hartley, and Berkeley:
Philosophy, Religion, and Politics, 1794-1796, Ph. D. diss., New
York University, 2002.
Raine, Kathleen. “Berkeley, Blake and the New Age.” Thought 51
(1976): 356-77.
Rashid, Salim. “Berkeley’s Querist and its Influence.” Journal
of the History of Economic Thought 12 (1990): 38-60.
_____. “Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy
of Money.” History of Political Economy 34 (2002): 818-19.
_____. “Berkeley’s Querist
and Its Influence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12
(1990): 38-60.
Raynor, David. “Minima Sensibilia in Berkeley and Hume.”
Dialogue
19 (1980): 196-200.
_____. “Review of Pierre Dubois, L’Oeuvre de Berkeley.”
Berkeley Newsletter
9 (1986): 19-21.
_____. “Berkeley’s Ontology.” Dialogue 26 (1987): 611-20.
_____. “Hume and Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” In Studies in
the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. M. A. Stewart.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, 231-50.
_____. “Berkeley et la théorie des minima sensibilia.” In Charles
(2004), 89-102.
Rebaglia, Alberta. “Essere e percepire una struttura linguistica: il
pensiero di George Berkeley quale presupposto filosofico.”
Epistemologia
12 (1989): 125-52.
Reininger, Robert.
Locke, Berkeley, Hume.
Reprint d. Ausg. München: E. Reinhardt, 1922. Nendeln/Liechtenstein:
Kraus, 1973.
Richetti, John J. Philosophical Writing: Locke, Berkeley,
Hume.
Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1983.
Richmond, Alasdair.
Berkeley’s Principles of Human Knowledge: A Reader’s Guide.
London: Continuum, 2009.
_____. “New
Interpretations of
Berkeley’s
Thought.”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
18 (2010): 724-26.
Rickless, Samuel C. “Review of John Roberts, A Metaphysics for the
Mob.” Philosophical Review 118 (2009): 244-47.
_____. “The Relation between Anti-abstractionism and Idealism in
Berkeley’s Metaphysics.” British Journal for the History of
Philosophy 20 (2012): 723-40.
_____. Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism. Corby: Oxford University
Press, 2013.
_____.
Review of Berkeley’s Idealism: A Critical Examination by Georges
Dicker. Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 15-39.
Rioux-Beaulne, Mitia. “Plaisir sensible et beauté morale dans le
troisième dialogue de l’Alciphron: Berkeley face à la naissance
de l’esthétique.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 205-22.
Risse, Heinz. Berkeley und der Demiurg: Requiem auf das Spiel in der
Sackgasse.
Bielefeld: Merlin, 1983.
Roberts, John R. A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George
Berkeley. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
_____. “‘Strange Impotence of Men’: Immaterialism, Anaemic Agents, and
Immanent Causation.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy
18 (2010), 411-31.
Robinson, Howard M. ‘Abstract Ideas’ and Immaterialism.” History of
European Ideas 7 (1986): 617-22.
_____. “Berkeley” in Bunnin (1996), 694-708.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Principles of Human Knowledge and Three
Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
_____. “Review:
Berkeley’s Thought.”
Mind 113 (2004): 571-75.
_____.
“Two Berkeleian Arguments about the Nature of Space.” In
Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 79-90.
Robles, José A. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley I.”
Diánoia
26 (1980): 151-77.
_____.
“Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley II.” Diánoia 27 (1981):
166-85.
_____. “Matemáticas hasta el siglo XVIII. ¿Qué son los números?”
Diánoia 28 (1982): 155-71.
_____. “Berkeley y su crítica a los fundamentos del cálculo.” Revista
Latinoamericana de Filosofia 10:2 (1984): 141-50.
_____. “Génesis de la noción de sustancia espiritual en la filosofia de
Berkeley.” Diánoia 30 (1984): 67-87.
_____. “George Berkeley, Commentarios filosoficos, Introduccion y
traduccion.” Contrafuerte (1985): 4-11.
_____. “Berkeley y los minima.”
Analisis
Filosofico
6 (1986): 1-12.
_____. “Berkeley: argumentacion filosofica.” Revista Latino Americano
de Filosofia 12 (1986): 45-53.
_____. “The Mottoes in the Analyst Debate.” Berkeley
Newsletter 9 (1986): 15-16.
_____. “Berkeley: distinción y separación.”
Dialogues
24 (1989): 81-102.
_____. “Hobbes, Berkeley y las ideas abstractas.” Revista de
Filosofia 12 (1989): 43-54.
_____.
The Mathematical Ideas of George Berkeley,
Ph. D. diss., Stanford University, 1990.
_____. Estudios berkeleianos. Mexico:Universidad Autónoma de
México, 1990.
_____.”Berkeley: Scepticism, Matter and Infinite Divisibility.”
In Popkin (1996).
_____. “Filosofia
natural y religion. Los casos de Newton, Boyle y Berkeley.” Revista
Patagonica de Filosofia 2 (2001): 43-56.
_____. “Philosophie naturelle et religion: les cas de Newton, Boyle et
Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 11-22.
_____.
“Newton y Berkeley: atomistas epicureos.”
Revista
Latinoamericana de Filosofia
30 (2004): 7-35.
Rodrigues da Silva, Marcos. “Instrumentalismo e explicaçao cientifica no
De motu de Berkeley.”
Scientiae Studia
4 (2006): 101-14.
Rogers, Karen.
“Two Mistakes About Berkeley.”
Philosophy
(1980): 552-53.
Ronchi, Vasco.
Commento alla Nuova
teoria della visione di George Berkeley. Firenze: Baccini & Chiappi,
1973. Estratto da: Atti della fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 29
(1974).
Rose, Thomasine. Verbivocovisual: the Presence of Bishop Berkeley in
Finnegans Wake. S. L.: Bellefonte Editeur, 1981.
Rosenbaum, S. E. “Berkeley’s World of Ideas.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 2 (1985): 421-34.
Ross, Ian Campbell and Berman, David. “George Berkeley
and the Authorship of The Memoirs of Signor Gaudentio di Lucca.”
Irish University Review 41 (2011): 196-201.
Rotem, Ornan. “An Encounter Between Philosophy and Religion.” Asian
Philosophy 3 (1993): 15-28.
Ryann, Todd. “A New Account of Berkeley’s Likeness Principle.”
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2006): 561-80.
Ryder, John. “Cadwallader, Colden, Samuel Johnson, and the Activity of
Matter: Materialism and Idealism in Colonial America.” Transactions
of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996): 248-72.
Saidel, Eric. “Making Sense of Berkeley’s Challenge.” History of
Philosophy Quarterly 10 (1993): 325-39.
Santos, Antônio Carlos dos. “Berkeley face à Mandeville: de Fable des
abeilles à la Lettre à Dion.” Science et Esprit 63
(2011): 163-77.
Sanyal, Shyamali. “George Berkeley on the Problem of Universals.”
Indian Philosophical Quarterly
10 (1983): 7-12.
Saporiti, Katia. Die Wirklichkeit der Dinge : eine Untersuchung des
Begriffs der Idee in der Philosophie George Berkeleys.
Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2006.
Sari, Mehmet Ali. “Descartes, Locke, and Berkeley on Primary and
Secondary Qualities” (in Turkish). Yeditepe'de Felsefe 10 (2011):
150-89.
Sasso, Javier. “Immaterialismo y verificacionismo en Filosofia del
entendimiento.” Revista Latinamericana de Filosofia 8 (1982):
247-54.
Scala, André. Berkeley. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2007.
Scallett, Jeffrey.
“A Sequel to Berkeley’s Dialogues: Excerpts.” Dialogue 17
(1974): 1-6.
Schabas, Margaret. “Hume's Monetary Thought Experiments.” Studies in
History and Philosophy of Science 39 (2008), 161-69.
Schliesser, Eric. “On the Origin of Modern Naturalism: The Significance
of Berkeley's Response to a Newtonian Indispensability Argument.”
Philosophica
(Belgium) 76 (2005), 45-66.
_____. “Wijsbegeerte
tussen wetenschap en moraal in een post-newtoniaanse wereld: Berkeley,
Hume, en Adam Smith.”
Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte
100 (2008): 244-46.
Schmaltz, Tad. “From
Causes to Laws.” In Clarke and Wilson, 32-50.
Schumacher, R. “Critique of Representationalism and Immaterialism. An
Overview of the Scholarly Literature on the Theories of George
Berkeley.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58 (2004):
279-97.
_____. “The Cognitive Impenetrability of Optical Illusions. George
Berkeley's Theory of Visual Perception in the Context of New
Approaches”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58 (2004):
505-26.
_____. “Berkeley on Visible Figure and Extension.” In Daniel,
Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 108-20.
_____.“Action in perception?
Empirical and philosophical arguments against the enactive approach to
perception.” Perception 37 (2008): 433-45.
Schwarte, L. and Saporiti, K. Vom Gebrauch der Vorstellung. Ideen bei
George Berkeley. München: Fink, 2011.
Schwartz, Claire. “Berkeley and His Contemporaries: The Question of
Mathematical Formalism.” In Parigi (2010b), 43-56.
_____. “Berkeley et les idées générales mathématiques.” Revue
Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 31-44.
_____. “Berkeley et la norme mathématique: de l’Alciphron à l’Analyste.”
In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 423-33.
Schwartz, Robert. Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes.
Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
_____. “Seeing Distance from a Berkeleian Perspective.” In Muehlmann
(1995), 217-30.
_____. Visual Versions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.
Seth Bordner, S.
“Berkeley's
‘Defense’ of ‘Commonsense’.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy
49
(2011): 315-38.
Sherry, David. “The Wake of Berkeley’s Analyst: Rigor
Mathematicae?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18
(1987): 455-80.
_____. “Don’t Take Half the Way: On Berkeley’s Mathematical Reasoning.”
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24, 2 (1993):
207-25.
Silver, Bruce. “The Conflicting Microscopic Worlds of Berkeley’s
Three Dialogues.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976):
343-49.
_____. “The Invisible World of Berkeley’s New theory of vision.”
New Scholasticism 51 (1977): 142-61.
_____. “A Reply to Professor Mirarchi.” Journal of the History of
Ideas 38 (1977): 714-15.
Silver, Bruce. “Boswell on Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Revisiting
the Stone.” Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (1993): 437-48.
Skemp, Sheila. “George Berkeley’s Newport Experience.” Rhode Island
History 37 (1978): 53-63.
Smalligan Marušić, Jennifer. “Comments on Michael Jacovides’ ‘How
Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive’.” Philosophia 37
(2009), 431-36.
Sorensen, Roy. Seeing Dark Things: The Philosophy of Shadows.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Sosa, Ernest. “Russell,
Berkeley y la materia objectivo.” Critica 7 (1975): 35-41.
_____. “Berkeley’s Master Stroke [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter
8 (1985): 16-18.
_____, ed., Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley.
Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.
Souza, José Carlos de.
“Deus na Filosofia
Empírica.”
Caminhando
13 (2008): 105-20.
Spicker, Gideon. Uber das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaft der
Philosophie: Kant, Hume und Berkeley.
Hildesheim: Olms, 2006.
Spiegel, James S. “The Theological Orthodoxy of Berkeley’s
Immaterialism.” Faith and Philosophy 13 (1996): 216-35.
_____. “The Christian Psychology of George Berkeley.” Journal of
Psychology and Christianity 17 (1998): 335-46.
Spinicci, Paolo. La visione e il liguaggio: considerazioni
sull’applicabilità del modello linguistico all’esperienza. Milano:
Guerini, 1992.
_____, ed., George Berkeley, Teoria della visione. Milano:
Guerini, 1995.
Spryszak, Przemysław. “Berkeley on the Nature of Mind” (in Polish).
Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 39 (2011): 25-41.
Stack, George J. “Berkeley’s Concept of Existence.” Modern Schoolman
53 (1976): 281-89.
_____. Berkeley’s Analysis of Perception.
New York: Lang, 1991.
Stadelmann, Elke. Philosophie aus der Besinnung des Denkens auf sich
selbst: Berkeley und Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1999.
Stammler, Gerhard. Berkeleys Philosophie der Mathematik.
Unveränd. Neudr. D. Ausg. Berlin 1921.Vaduz: Topos, 1978.
Stanford, W. B. “Berkeley and the Libyan Monster.” Berkeley
Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 10-11.
Steinkraus, Warren E. “A Piece of Sensible Bread.” Indian
Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1978): 619-25.
_____. “Review of Houghton, Berman, Lapan, Images of Berkeley.”
Berkeley Newsletter
9 (1986): 17-18.
Stepanenko, Pedro. “La concepcion berkeleyana del yo.”
Contrafuerte
(1985): 12-18.
Stephens, John, ed., The Guardian. Kentucky: The University
Press, 1982.
_____. “Berkeley and Lady Burlington: a Footnote.” Berkeley
Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 16-17.
Sterling, M. C. “Berkeley contra el realismo.” Sapienta 33
(1978): 153-55.
Stewart, Jon. “Borges and the Refutation of Idealism: A Study of ‘Tlon
Uqbar, Orbis Tertius’.” Ideas y Valores (1996): 64-99.
Stewart, M. A. “William Wishart, an Early Critic of Alciphron.”
Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 5-9.
_____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club [Abstract].” Berkeley
Newsletter 8 (1985): 19.
_____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club.” Hermathena 139 (1985):
25-46.
_____. “Add MS. 39305 [Review].” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986):
6-11.
_____. “Review of Berkeley, Oeuvres, tom. I, edited by Geneviève
Brykman.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 10-13.
_____. “Berkeley’s Introduction Draft.” Berkeley Newsletter 11
(1989/90): 10-19.
_____. “Reid on Locke and Personal Identity: Some Lost Sources.”
Locke Newsletter 28 (1997): 105-16.
Stoneham, Tom. Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three
Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 2002.
_____. “Review:
Berkeley and the Principles of
Human Knowledge.” Mind 112 (2003): 126-30.
_____. “George Berkeley: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of
Human Knowledge.” In Central Works of Philosophy: The Seventeenth
and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. John Shand. Montreal: McGinn-Queen’s
University Press, 2005.
_____.
“Catching Berkeley’s Shadow.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 49
(2011): 116-36.
Storhoff, Gary. “The Artist as Universal Mind: Berkeley’s Influence on
Charles Johnson.” African American Review 30 (1996): 539-48.
Storrie, Stefan.
“Anne Berkeley’s Contrast: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 22
(2011): 9-14.
_____. “Berkeley’s Apparent Cartesianism in De Motu.” Archiv
für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (2012): 353–366.
_____. “What is it the Unbodied Spirit cannot do? Berkeley and Barrow on
the Nature of Geometrical Construction.” British Journal for the
History of Philosophy 20 (2012): 249-68.
Stroll, Avrum. “Two Lines of Argumentation in Berkeley’s Principles:
a Reply to George S. Pappas.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 139-44.
Stroud, Barry. “Berkeley vs. Locke on Primary Qualities.” Philosophy
55 (1980): 149-66.
_____.
Philosophers Past and Present. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2011.
Stuart, James. “Berkeley’s Appearance/Reality Distinction.”
Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 8 (1977): 119-30.
Stubenberg, L. “Divine Ideas: the Cure-All for Berkeley’s
Immaterialism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (1990): 221-49.
Szabo, Zoltan Gendler. “Berkeley’s Triangle.” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 12 (1995): 41-63.
_____. “Sententialism and Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Philosophical
Quarterly 55 (2005): 462-74.
Szalek, Piotr. “O
genezie Berkeleyowskiej definicji ‘istnienia’
[“On the
Genesis of the Berkeleian Definition of ‘Existence’ (in Polish)].” In
Stanislaw Janeczek, ed. Oblicza filozofii XVII wieku [Faces of
the XVIIth-Century Philosophy]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL [Catholic
University Press], 2008, 93-113.
_____.
“On the Origins of the Berkeleian Definition of ‘Existence’.”
Studies in Logic,
Grammar, and Rethoric
15 (2009): 145-59.
Szymańska, Marta.
“George Berkeley’s Philosophy in Polish Studies.”
Berkeley Studies
19 (2008), 32-40.
_____. Review of Recovering
Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context by
Scott Breuninger. Berkeley Studies 22 (2011): 15-19.
Taranto, Domenico. “Berkeley critico di Mandeville. Note su etica ed
epistemologia nella polemica con i freethinkers.” Pensiero
politico 14 (1981): 243-61.
Taranto, Pascal. Du déisme à l’athéisme: la libre-pensée d’Anthony
Collins. Paris: Editions Honoré Champion, 2000.
_____. “Le personnage de Diagoras.”
In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 361-70.
_____. “Alciphron ou la théorie du complot.” Science et Esprit
63 (2011): 223-36.
Taylor, C. C. W. “Berkeley’s Theory of Abstract Ideas.” Philosophical
Quarterly 28 (1978): 97-115.
Tennant, R. C. “The Anglican Response to Locke’s Theory of Personal
Identity.”
Journal of the History of Ideas
43 (1982): 73-90.
Thaliath, Babu. Der prozeß der geometrisch-optischen Perspektivierung
in der visuellen Raumwahrnehmung.
Freiburg: Universität Freiburg, 2001.
Thomas, Andrew. “God, Vision
and Power.” Studia Theologica: Nordic Journal
of Theology 62 (2008): 80-97.
Thomas, George H. “Berkeley’s God Does Not Perceive.” Journal of the
History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 163-68.
_____, ed., “George Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries;
Explanatory Notes by A. A. Luce.” Alliance, Ohio: Mount Union College,
1976.
Thrane, Gary. “Berkeley’s Proper Objects of Vision.” Journal of the
History of Ideas 38 (1977): 243-60.
Tipton, Ian. “ ‘Ideas’ in Berkeley and Arnauld.” History of European
Ideas 7 (1986): 575-84.
_____. “Berkeley’s Imagination.” In Sosa (1987), 85-102.
_____. “Descartes’ Demon and Berkeley’s World.” Philosophical
Investigations 15 (1992): 111-30.
Tomeček, Marek. “Essays
on the Concept of Mind in Early-Modern Philosophy.”
Reflexe 40 (2011): 120-122.
_____.
Review of Essays
on the Concept of Mind in Early-Modern Philosophy, eds. Petr Glombíček and James
Hill.
Reflexe 40 (2011): 120-22.
Tomida, Yasuhiko. “Ideas Without Causality: One More Locke in Berkeley.”
Locke Studies 11 (2011): 139-54.
_____. Locke, Berkeley, Kant: From a Naturalistic Point of View.
Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2012.
_____. “The Lockean Materialist Basis of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.”
Locke Studies 10 (2010): 179-97.
Tommy, C. A. “A Berkeleian Model of Memory.” Journal of Indian
Council of Philosophical Research 22 (2005), 93-121.
Tooley, Michael. “The
Skeptical Challenges of Hume and Berkeley: Can They Be Answered?”
Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association
85 (2011): 27-46.
Torode, Brian. “A Berkeleian Correction.” Berkeley Newsletter 4
(1980): 15.
Trapnell, W. H. The Treatment of Christian Doctrine by Philosophers
of the Natural Light from Descartes to Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell,
1988.
Tricaud, François. “L’immaterialisme est-il réfutable?”
History of European Ideas
7 (1986): 591-96.
Triepke,
Sandra.
Berkeleys
Immaterialismus: In Bezugnahme auf sein Hauptwerk “Prinzipien über die
Menschliche Erkenntnis.”
Norderstedt
Germany: Grin (2009).
Tsai, Denis Hsin-An. “God
and the Problems of Evil in Berkeley.” Philosophical Review 6
(1983): 125-36.
Turbayne, Colin M. “Grosseteste and an Ancient Optical Principle.”
Isis 50 (1959): 467-72.
_____, ed., Berkeley. Critical and interpretive essays.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
_____. “Hume’s Influence on Berkeley.” Revue internationale de
philosophie 154 (1985): 259-69.
_____. Metaphors for the Mind: The Creative Mind and its Origin.
Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991.
Tweyman, Stanley. “Berkeley’s Denial of the Denial of Blind Agency: a
Reply to Kenneth P. Winkler.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 145-51.
Umbaugh, Bruce. On Berkeley. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson,
2000.
Urmson, J. O. Berkeley.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science in the Siris.”
History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 562-66.
_____. “Berkeley on Beauty.” In Berman (1993), 179-84.
Vermeulen, Ben. “Berkeley and Nieuwentijt on infinitesimals.”
Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 1-5.
Vesey, Godfrey, ed., Berkeley: Reason and Experience. London:
Open University Press, 1982.
Vernon, David. “Review of Robert Schwartz, Vision: Variations on Some
Berkeleian Themes.”
Berkeley Newsletter
13 (1993/94) : 9-14.
Vienne, Jean-Marie. “Les rapports entre raison et foi a la lumière de la
vision.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger
(1997): 45-58.
_____.“La substance, de Descartes à Berkeley. ” In Brykman (1997),
149-63.
Vienne, Jean-Michel. “Suggestion, habitude et jugement: la part cachée
de la Théorie de la vision de Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003), 79-102.
_____. “Notions métaphysiques, notions physiques.” In Charles (2004).
Vincente Burgoa, Lorenzo. “Critica de las ideas abstractas: la
abstraccion como simple semantica.” Revista de
Filosofia
(Daimon) 12 (1996): 49-60.
Wahl, Russell and Westphal, Jonathan. “Descartes, Leibniz and Berkeley
on Whether We Can Dream Marks on the Waking State.” Studia
Leibnitiana 24 (1992): 177-81.
Waldenfels, B. “Esse est percipi. Studies on George Berkeley’s
Philosophy.” Philosophische Rundschau 49 (2002): 271-72.
Walker, Ralph Charles Sutherland. The Real in the Ideal: Berkeley’s
Relation to Kant. New York: Garland, 1989.
Walmsley, Peter. The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Ward, Ian D. S. “George Berkeley: Precursor of Keynes or Moral Economist
on Underdevelopment?” Journal of Political Economy 67 (1959):
31-40.
_____. “George Berkeley as an Economist: Reply.” Journal of Political
Economy 68 (1960): 307-10.
Warnock, Geoffrey J. Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982.
_____. “On Passive Obedience.” History of European Ideas 7
(1986): 555-62.
Watson, Richard A. “Berkeley Is Pronounced Barclay.” Berkeley
Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 1-3.
Waxman, Wayne.
Kant and the Empiricists: Understanding Understanding. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2005.
_____.“Kant’s Debt to
the British Empiricists.” In Bird (2006), 93-107.
Weinberg, Julius R. Abstraction, Relation, and Induction: Three
Essays in the History of Thought. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press,
1965.
Weldon, Susan. “Direct Realism and Visual Distortion: A Development of
Arguments from Thomas Reid.” Journal of the History of Philosophy
20 (1982): 355-68.
Wenz, Peter. “Berkeley’s Christian Neo-Platonism.” Journal of the
History of Ideas 37 (1976): 537-46.
_____. “The Books in Berkeley’s Closet.” Hermathena 128 (1980):
33-40.
_____. “Berkeley and Kant on the Analytic and Synthetic a priori.”
Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 1-5.
_____. “Berkeley’s Two Concepts of Impossibility: a Reply to McKim.”
Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (1982): 673-80.
Wheeler, Kathleen M. “Berkeley’s Ironic Method in the Three Dialogues.”
Philosophy and Literature
4 (1980), 18-32.
Wilke, Andrea-Ursula. Philosophie und Stil: eine Verhältnisbestimmung
dargestellt an Berkeley, Kant und Wittgenstein.
Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2006.
Williamson, Timothy. “Review of Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial
Celebration, edited by John Foster and Howard Robinson.” Berkeley
Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 5-7.
Williford, Kenneth. “Berkeley’s Theory of Operative Language in the
Manuscript Introduction”, British Journal for the History of
Philosophy 11 (2003): 271-301.
_____, and Jakapi, Roomet. “Berkeley’s Theory of Meaning in Alciphron
VII.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2009):99
– 118.
Wilson, Catherine. “On Imlay’s ‘Berkeley and Action’.” In Muehlmann
(1995), 183-96.
Wilson, Fred. “Berkeley’s Metaphysics and Ramist Logic.” In Easton
(1997).
Wilson, Margaret Dauler. “The ‘Phenomenalisms’ of Berkeley and Kant.” in
Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, ed. A. W. Wood. Ithaca and
London: Cornell University Press, 1984, 157-73.
_____. “Berkeley on the Mind-Dependence of Colors.” Pacific
Philosophical Quarterly 68 (1987): 249-64.
_____. “The Phenomenalisms of Leibniz and Berkeley.” In Sosa (1987),
3-22.
_____. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy.
Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1999.
_____.
Kant and “The Dogmatic Idealism of Berkeley.”
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.
Winkler, Kenneth P., ed. George
Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.
Hackett, 1982.
_____. “The Authorship of Guardian 69.” Berkeley Newsletter
7 (1984): 1-6.
_____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency
[Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 20.
_____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency.”
Hermathena
139 (1985): 81-100.
_____. “Berkeley on Abstract Ideas.” Archiv für Geschichte der
Philosophie 65 (1985): 63-80.
_____. “Berkeley, Newton and the Stars.” Studies in Philosophy and
the History of Philosophy 17 (1986): 23-42.
_____. Berkeley: An Interpretation.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
_____, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley.Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2005.
_____. “Berkeley and the Doctrine of Signs.”
In
Winkler (2005), 125-65.
_____. “Marvellous Emptiness: Berkeley on Consciousness and
Self-Consciousness.”
In
Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),
223-50.
_____.
“Continuous Creation.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (2011):
287-309.
Wintzer, Heinrich. George Berkeley: vernachlässigte Ressourcen des
logischen Positivismus.
Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1998.
Wisdom, J. O. “Berkeley’s Criticism of the Infinitesimal.” British
Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (1953): 22-25.
Woolhouse, R. S. “Berkeley and ‘A Famous Man of Modern Times’.”
Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 5-8.
Woozley, A. D. “Berkeley on Action.” Philosophy 60 (1985):
293-307.
_____. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions and Theory of Meaning.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 427-34.
Yolton, John W. “Ideas and Knowledge in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy 13 (1975): 145-65.
_____. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Oxford:
Blackwell, 1984.
_____. Thinking Matter. Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain.
Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.
_____, ed., Philosophy, Religion and Science in the Seventeenth and
Eighteenth Centuries. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester
Press, 1990.
_____. “The Term ‘Idea’ in Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century British
Philosophy.”
In Idea,
ed. Marta Fattori and Massimo Luigi Bianchi. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo,
1990, 237-54.
Young, Theodore A. Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs.
Modern Philosophy. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1985.
Zakatistovs, Atis. “Berkeley a-t-il anticipé le problème de
l’induction?” In Charles (2004), 23-36.
Zukowski, Bartosz.
“Berkeley’s Doctrine of Existence: A Linguistic Approach” (in Polish).
Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy 30 (2011): 93-108. |