Elsevier

Space Policy

Volume 24, Issue 2, May 2008, Pages 80-89
Space Policy

A proposed strategy against cost overruns in the space sector: The 5C approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2008.02.006Get rights and content

Abstract

The space sector has frequently been confronted with cost overruns, with a negative impact on its management reputation. There are many reasons for this effect, the main one being that space development contracts are unique and often do not allow proper cost benchmarking. On the other hand, tools have been developed to minimise this effect and it is important to train future space managers in applying such tools. In the International Space University, such methods are illustrated with workshops, which aim to be as close as possible to reality. This article will describe the different techniques, memo-technically called the 5C approach here, and develop the use of a computerised tool, PRICE, to support these techniques in the different phases of the projects.

Section snippets

The problem with cost overruns in the space sector

Cost overruns are not unique to the space sector but are a classical problem in public spending. Early examples can be found in Roman history, as quoted by Gibbon [1]:

The young magistrate (Herod, son of Atticus), observing that the town of Troas was indifferently supplied with water, obtained from the munificence of Hadrian 300 myriads of drachmas for the construction of a new aqueduct. But in the execution of the works the charge amounted to more than double the estimate, and the officers of

The 5C approach to avoid cost overruns

Because of the lack of benchmarking possibilities and a high level of technical uncertainty associated with space projects, it is evident that cost control for such one-shot development programmes can be very challenging.

A five-step approach to help future space managers has been developed as follows [5]:

Step 1: Realistic cost estimation.

Step 2: Consideration on the life cycle cost (LCC).

Step 3: An appropriate contractual framework.

Step 4: Cost control and risk management during the project

The use of computer tools to support these approaches

In order to train future space managers in this management technique, a number of lectures and workshops have been developed at ISU. The more realistic these workshops, the higher the probability that the future managers will be properly trained. Therefore the proper tools are needed.

The basis of these workshops is a simplified request for proposal (RFP) exercise, based upon the principles of standard industrial RFPs. The tendering is then executed on the basis of a competition between student

Conclusion

It is very important for managerial reputation in the space sector, and indeed also to recover from a bad reputation in this area, that cost overruns be reduced in future. One needs to recognise that development contracts have a higher risk in the space field and that this risk needs to be properly managed.

Control techniques have been developed for this purpose over the past few decades and are applied in procurement agencies by project controllers. However, there are two specific points to be

References (23)

  • Gibbon E. The decline and fall of the Roman Empire, vol. 1. 1962. p....
  • M. Peck et al.

    The weapons acquisition process, an economic analysis

    (1962)
  • M. Holman

    The political economy of the space program

    (1974)
  • S. Johnson

    The secret of Apollo: system management in American and European Space Programs

    (2002)
  • W. Peeters

    Cost engineering lectures

    (2007)
  • ISPA. Parametric estimating handbook. 3rd ed. 2003. Available on...
  • N. Augustine

    Augustine's laws

    (1997)
  • W. Peeters

    Space marketing

    (2000)
  • H. Kerner

    Project management

    (1995)
  • D. Cooper

    Project risk management guidelines

    (2005)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Project cost risk analysis: A Bayesian networks approach for modeling dependencies between cost items

      2014, International Journal of Project Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Magnussen and Olsson (2006) provided a comparative analysis of cost estimates of major public investment projects. Peeters and Madauss (2008) described the different techniques, memo-technically called the 5C approach, and developed the use of a computerized tool, PRICE, to support these techniques against cost overruns in the space sector. Chou (2009, 2011) introduced streamlining Monte Carlo simulation processes and input probability distribution selection via hypothesis, and specification of correlation between simulated variables to create an early-stage cost distribution for budget allocation.

    • Cost-benefit analysis of space exploration: Some ethical considerations

      2009, Space Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite the considerable flexibility allowed by the CBA paradigm, CBA is commonly implemented with costs and benefits being measured in units of money [7]. This is the case, for example, in recent discussions of space policy appearing in this journal [8,9].1 Thus, while remaining open to the broader range of possible versions of CBA, this paper will pay particular attention to the commonly used CBA based on units of money.

    • Comparing risks assessment in construction projects using two program

      2018, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
    • Managing the architecture of life-cycle processes of unique technical objects

      2017, Proceedings of the 30th International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2017 - Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic development, Innovation Management, and Global Growth
    • Effect of project managers' skills on construction project delivery

      2017, International Journal of Management and Decision Making
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text