Shortcut: WD:RFD

Wikidata:Requests for deletions

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Requests for deletions
Items that do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidataconnect.

Please use {{Q+}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if the user is still active on Wikidata and the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

Duplicate items should be merged, not deleted: see Help:Merge.

Do not blank items in anticipation of deletion. In particular, do not remove sitelinks, even if you have requested the deletion of the page in the sitelink's target wiki or if you think that sitelinks of this type should not have Wikidata items.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please read Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion and either contact the deleting admin or use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead.

More information

Manual requests

To add a request, you can also add: 

== {{Q|ITEMID}} ==
{{rfd links|ITEMID|REASON}}
A_reason_why_the_item_should_be deleted. --~~~~

Change ITEMID to the page you want deleted (should be in the form Q###). Please also add a reason (REASON), or it will probably be ignored if it is not an obvious case of vandalism. All requests should go to the bottom of the page.

Bulk deletions

To request the deletion of multiple items for the same reason:

Translate this header box!
On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2024/06/10.

Requests for deletions

high

~161 open requests for deletions.

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}

[edit]
User:EL TNZ PA'
User:SaraGoli Minimalist
User:Socio1001
User:Sohofest

Click here to purge if this list is out of date.

Requests

[edit]

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.


Q101099318

[edit]

Walt Disney Animation Studios film universes (Q101099318): fictional universes of the eponymous film series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not really an established universe. There are some cameos, but not much interaction between properties (barring some specific, separate universes like Q7894222. --(Oinkers42) (talk) 00:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:00, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade We could use your input as creator. Is there outside coverage of this being a shared universe? --Emu (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I made this item specifically to connect different Walt Disney Animation Sutiods film universes to each other through P361. Trade (talk) 15:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade Yeah, I understand that, but is there a connection apart from those universes all being produced by Disney? And if so, is there a source that says so? --Emu (talk) 10:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No Trade (talk) 13:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per reasons provided by RAN Jack4576 (talk) 12:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete For sure there's Disney movies that contain fictional universes, but calling them "universe of Disney movie X" or whatever is kind of nonsensical. Like item lists "Aladdin universe", but the movie takes place in the fictional Arabian city of Agrabah. Sure, it's a fictional city, but "universe"? No. Whereas the Great Mouse Detective, which is also on the list, takes place in late 1800s London. Again, that's not a "universe." Really, this whole thing is an exercise in taking the titles of random Disney movies, putting the word "universe" at the end, and calling it a "Disney universe." Which is clearly just non-sensical, unverifiable, and not what Wikidata exits for. What's next, a list of "Walt Disney Animation Studios film universe foods" that lists spaghetti, among other real world dishes, because of that one scene in Lady and the Tramp? Come on. It's at least an exercise in pointless minutia if nothing else. Although again, I don't think its in line with the purpose of Wikidata. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - not going to supervote by closing this as not done, but I think this should qualify as filling a structural need under WD:N #3. As I've noted in the past, we should air on the side of inclusion so long as it doesn't violate BLP and isn't blatant advertizing. Someone might find this useful. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think it can qualify as fulfilling a structural need if it's not actually necessary to store the data. Omphalographer already pointed out that we have other properties for data like this. If there is actually a structural need, someone should be able to explain what data this allows us to store that we otherwise can't. - Nikki (talk) 11:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    What do you think about all the one-movie fictional universes that are being created? Bovlb (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I think those are pretty unnecessary. Also, fair point Nikki (and Omphalographer) - on reconsideration I think I'm comfortable deleting this. No objections to fictional universe articles in general, but there should be some reason for them. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 04:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
81.233.91.76 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
This IP has created many fictional universes over the last few days which I think are all or mostly Disney. I don't know how this relates to Trade's item, but it seems like something that should be considered together. Bovlb (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This has been open for almost eight months, and there are three votes for keep, and three for delete, thus no consensus. Therefore, maybe this could be closed as not deleted, considering there isn't a consensus to delete nor to keep? EPIC (talk) 00:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RfD discussion aren’t elections, they are only meant to bring forward new arguments. Therefore, deciding them isn’t tallying the vote but rather weighing the arguments, i. e. deciding if any of the notability criteria is met. --Emu (talk) 09:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I'm leaning towards delete as some of the deletion arguments are quite strong, but also unsure as it might go under WD:N #3. EPIC (talk) 10:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Like Ajraddatz I don't want to supervote by closing without clear consensus, but I think this should be a delete - no sources listed that talk about this being a thing and I don't think it actually fulfills a structural need --DannyS712 (talk) 20:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also a little unsure about the actual structural need of this. However, it seems like a whopping 54 items link here - those will have to be cleaned up if deleted, but if it's not an actual established thing I don't see a problem with deleting. EPIC (talk) 00:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111908433

[edit]

Scooby-Doo location (Q111908433): location appearing in the Scooby-Doo universe: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q3895768 Trade (talk) 20:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We can’t merge because this is clearly a different concept. But I somehow doubt that this item is notable. --Emu (talk) 10:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
how about i switch it's uses out with Q3895768. Would you support deletion then? @Emu: --Trade (talk) 23:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade I guess? Those type of items are often problematic, see our discussion at #Q101099318. Might be a good idea to come up with some clarification of WD:N for similar artwork-related “in universe items”. --Emu (talk) 07:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Those type of items are often problematic" Please elaborate? Unsure what you are refering to Trade (talk) 22:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for starters they are often under-sourced and thus relying heavily on the structural need clause which is arguably open to interpretation. --Emu (talk) 11:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dunno, they seem to be doing fine with sourcing to me Trade (talk) 15:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Years ago, items like this were needed to connect items of works and fictional objects to their respective media franchise. But ever since the creation of media franchise (P8345) (used in combination with from narrative universe (P1080), takes place in fictional universe (P1434) and/or present in work (P1441)), there isn't really any structural need for these individual "fictional X from franchise Y" items anymore. --2A02:810B:580:11D4:85C0:E878:CD68:A4A7 03:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Notable issue. Should be removed. ImtiazTopu (talk) 16:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q62018913

[edit]

London Buses route 409 (Q62018913): UK bus route: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This bus route doesn't exist, and never did. It's the exact same as w:Surrey bus route 409. It's just that it used to go to w:Fairfield Halls and Purley, before being cut back to Selsdon Library due to w:London low emission zone and other reasons. It was never owned by London Buses, only Metrobus/Southdown. Hence delete this to avoid confusion. Also, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/12/Category:London Buses route 409 Matrix (talk) 20:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's a Commons category but it will probably be redirected; the items can then be merged. It was not operated by London Buses, but seems to have been operated by London Transport. Peter James (talk) 17:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On hold pending result of CFD on Commons. EPIC (talk) 01:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge if categories are merged in Commons.--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that the CFD on Commons is still open. –FlyingAce✈hello 15:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q50338003

[edit]

Kamal A La Prod (Q50338003): Kamal A La Prod is a French Music Producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 00:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. Bit unsure about this one. Looking at his Spotify and Youtube pages he does seem to have a reasonable amount of listens/views. Still a bit unsure about the notability though as there are no site links and a lack of references (even though there are good identifiers) EPIC (talk) 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This one leans towards  Keep for me - page does not appear overly promotional, clearly a person that can be meaningfully described by available sources. Only issue is a lack of statement references, but that can be remedied. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 01:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q117749885

[edit]

Audiovisual documentary of Efik language (Q117749885): The audiovisual documentary of Efik language by its native speaker: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Posting for discussion, not immediate action. This is an item for a video that, so far as I can tell, has only been published on Wikimedia Commons. The video is not otherwise identified, and there are no external references. The video itself appears to be a well-intentioned effort to document a traditionally under-documented part of world culture. Does this meet any of our notability criteria? The same user has created many items of similar type. CC @ Olaniyan Olushola Bovlb (talk) 19:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I came across these a while ago and decided not to nominate them here. While I still think they are well-meant and also a representation of a relevant topic, which is traditionally under-documented, as you said, I am also unsure how these could meet our notability criteria. I guess linking them with the respective language is not enough for WD:N #3? --Dorades (talk) 19:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi@Bovlb, thank you for your observation and continuous contribution to improving Wikidata. Please note that we're currently working on a Nigeria Language Oral History documentation project aimed at producing audiovisual documentaries of Nigeria's indigenous languages by its native speakers to narrate their stories and using the audiovisual files to improve Wikipedia pages where such languages exist and donation for research purposes. Also, the project helps to salvage a collection of endangered knowledge with limited coverage in the media. So, each audiovisual describes an indigenous language in terms of history, culture, tradition, etc.; naturally, language is a notable subject and most times with an existing Wikipedia page in this case ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abi,_Cross_River) and Wikidata (Q3510527), however, instead of merging the audiovisual documentary information with each indigenous language they represented. We have considered creating a Wiki data item for each file to describe the metadata related to each audiovisual production.
Also, I have created a URL link to substantiate the notability of the subject referred to in the documentary. More importantly, i will like to know how best to incorporate this item in a way to create more visibility for this class of knowledge. Thanks for your understanding Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 09:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Does not meet WD:N --Ameisenigel (talk) 12:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122057327

[edit]

David Isserman (Q122057327): American entrepreneur, investor, Portuguese knight and philanthropist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable and promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 04:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated one of these items for deletion below. As for The Explorers Club (Q2411202), the name is present in their list of officials, roughly the 30th name out of 50 listed — is that enough to establish notability? Because otherwise Isserman looks like a self-promoter without any substantial coverage in reliable sources, using sneaky tactics like abuse of ORCID and FilmFreeway identifiers (which have both been deleted/locked). Jamie7687 (talk) 07:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One linking item deleted; is the The Explorers Club (Q2411202) connection or something else enough for notability? Jamie7687 (talk) 05:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I have made a few changes to the item in case it is not deleted soon. I have fit the description to guidelines, removed an entirely incorrect identifier, and deprecated the previously-mentioned deleted/locked identifiers. Jamie7687 (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Sir David Isserman" no less — really? Ennobled by a pretender to a defunct Portuguese throne who bestows "Knighthoods" on American ecommerce entrepreneurs. Hmmm... -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 12:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122916541

[edit]

Big Interview (Q122916541): Tech company offering an online job interview training tool and a library of free online resources.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 18:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Notable. Searching Google for "Big Interview" you'll find it's used by a number of US Universities and also Coursera https://www.coursera.org/biginterview Piecesofuk (talk) 19:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That a business or university uses a piece of software or webapp doesn't make it notable. The Coursera page looks like two courses on their platform. Not sure that any of that is a reliable source to establish notibility. -- William Graham (talk) 19:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Passes Wikidata notability #2 "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."
Other references:
https://careers.northeastern.edu/article/big-interview/
https://careerservices.upenn.edu/resources/big-interview/
https://eu.jacksonville.com/story/business/2017/05/16/work-wanted-big-interview-great-practice-tool/15755120007/
https://career.ucsb.edu/digital-resources-toolkit/big-interview
https://careers.usc.edu/resources/big-interview/
https://careers.umbc.edu/tools/big-interview/ Piecesofuk (talk) 20:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These read pretty much like written by the company, I think. Thus not serious, in my opinion. --Dorades (talk) 22:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the review in the Florida Times-Union (Q3520924) was written by the company. Anyway, they all show that the platform exists and is widely used and therefore enough to pass Wikidata notability. Piecesofuk (talk) 08:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Florida Times Union link seems to be a pretty uncritical listing of product features from a person in that industry. I'm not sure it's especially serious. -- William Graham (talk) 16:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
... they all show that the platform exists and is widely used and therefore enough to pass Wikidata notability. Where do you find this in WD:N? --Dorades (talk) 18:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikidata notability #2 "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." Piecesofuk (talk) 18:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This very paragraph says that "serious and publicly available references" are needed to desribe such an entity. So just existing and being used is not enough. --Dorades (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've given plenty of serious and publicly available references above. Here's some more
https://www.vogue.com/article/job-interview-tips-dos-donts-advice
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/career-advice/mastering-the-online-job-interview/article19626191/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacquelynsmith/2012/09/14/the-top-75-websites-for-your-career/ Piecesofuk (talk) 19:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1 and 2: Not about the company, just quoting the founder. 3: A forbes list article of 75 items. None of them are serious sources about Big Interview. -- William Graham (talk) 19:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They all describe what the company is, they're all mainstream sources. I really don't understand what your definition of "serious" is then. Since Pamela Skillings (Q122923841) is notable and she co-founded the company then it also passes N3: "It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful." Piecesofuk (talk) 20:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to argue criteria 3 for structural need. But in regards to what is serious source for a business, I would want to see either academic/scholarly works or journalistic coverage.
  • I would not accept things that are published by the item's subject or their employees. I.e. blogs and social media
  • Paid content, press releases, and routine financial reporting in the same category as self published works and aren't sufficiently journalism
  • Business directories and telephone directories aren't especially serious.
  • Similarly having search results (on Google, Bing, etc) is probably not enough.
  • For journalistic works, I think there should be some kind of reporting and not simple quoting of the business's marketing materials or attributing a quoted person by identifying their employer. Being mentioned in passing is probably not sufficient serious coverage of the subject. If the article is entirely about the business, I usually want to see some investigation or confirming of facts from sources that are not the subject or their employees. Journalism probably should include a manner of selectivity or editorial, i.e. an large or indiscriminate list of things is probably not sufficient (list article).
This is just my point of view and there have been other discussions in the past where the community has discussed what serious means and declined to try to create some kind of exhaustive list. A serious source can vary due to the nature of the item. See Wikidata talk:Notability.
Edit to add User:Emu/Notability#“serious_and_publicly_available_references” I think this user page, while not policy also has some links to how the community has considered things in the past.

-- William Graham (talk) 21:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your detailed response. I've always treated Wikidata's notability far looser than Wikipedia hence I would regard a source citing an entity's existence, as in for example the .edu sites and the Vogue etc. articles, as enough for Wikidata notability. But ultimately it's up to the Administrators what to keep and delete and hopefully they'll perhaps clarify in more detail what notability and serious references mean. Piecesofuk (talk) 21:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As an aside, I think a lot of Wikidata editors myself included, are sensitive to Wikidata accumulating tons of items on entrepreneurs and businesses (digital startups especially) that feel nearly entirely promotional. Businesses and their advertising agencies/SEO people create items with the hopes that Google will import those items into Google Knowledge Graph. Being in Google Knowledge Graph usually leads to an info box on Google Search results and they hope having one will increase their visibility to customers/investors. So when dealing with those kinds of items there can be an elevated level of skepticism regarding notability. -- William Graham (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Jayvee Enaguas

[edit]
Batch 1
  1. Q104434391 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q114185497 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q116768914 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q116091006 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q113371891 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q113365191 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q117232898 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q116777556 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q116783723 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q116198661 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q116646199 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q116198510 (delete | history | links | logs)
  13. Q116789914 (delete | history | links | logs)
  14. Q116264933 (delete | history | links | logs)
  15. Q116203760 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)
Batch 2
  1. Q114884723 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q114827501 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q114284346 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q114200353 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q113953352 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q113273216 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q112692943 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q112119452 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q114354535 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 00:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the founder and creator here, but why are you jeopardizing me? - THV | ♂ | U | T - 00:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi The Harvett Vault, I have nominated these items for deletion because I think they do not demonstrate notability (WD:N) in the Wikidata sense. Regards, --Dorades (talk) 00:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I admit that they're partially redundant while letting them unlink. Man, for personal reasons, I'm getting out of my sanity. THV | ♂ | U | T - 01:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 03:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Jayvee Enaguas (Q104434391) does not have any notable identifiers or references. The same seems to apply to the other items listed. --Haansn08 (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, The Harvett Vault (Q116372700) too. I'll see what happens when anyone gets them all vanished. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 13:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q76368896

[edit]

Murad Islamov (Q76368896): soccer player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability --2804:14D:BAA0:93EC:C190:C659:A82F:4EDA 21:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Notable. I found the correct identifier for him
ImtiazTopu (talk) 04:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: The references don't seem to be high quality, some sites seem to be just content farms. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly  Keep Not notable as a footballer but possibly as an entrepreneur. Coverage in mainstream media: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/abysmal-footballer-wages-usa-bagels-29338330 https://www.jpost.com/special-content/article-689254 https://eu.courier-journal.com/story/entertainment/dining/restaurant/2022/11/30/louisville-bagels-maya-bagel-express-open-poplar-level-road/69634845007/ https://www.elitedaily.com/lifestyle/maya-bagel-express-brings-a-taste-of-new-york-to-kentucky https://www.flaunt.com/blog/murad-islamov Piecesofuk (talk) 10:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124311410

[edit]

Q124311410: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notably WT20 (talk) 17:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If they are a sibling of Tadeusz Rydzyk (Q737540) I think it should be notable, but who the item is about is unclear. EPIC (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request Bamouzou

[edit]

@ Bamouzou

Extended content
  1. Q117831686 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q118109789 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q118109894 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q118109937 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q118110106 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q118112412 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q118112444 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q118112467 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q118112512 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q118112527 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

No indication of notability; creator has been advised about notability but is not responsive Bovlb (talk) 17:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Q118112564 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q118112580 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q118112603 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q118112618 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q118112631 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q118112645 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q118112658 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q118365121 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q118366096 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q118366298 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

No indication of notability; creator has been advised about notability but is not responsive Bovlb (talk) 17:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Q118366387 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q118366408 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q118366418 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q118366436 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q118366772 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q118366816 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q119056950 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q119057703 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q119059540 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q119061490 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

No indication of notability; creator has been advised about notability but is not responsive Bovlb (talk) 17:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Q119062949 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q119293847 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q119294011 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q119294746 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q119786047 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

No indication of notability; creator has been advised about notability but is not responsive Bovlb (talk) 17:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would  Keep those that are instance of (P31) canton of Togo (Q21020546) as they would pass WDN3. I checked the first few and they're all listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantons_of_Togo Piecesofuk (talk) 18:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Piecesofuk.--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q79460869

[edit]

Ibrahim Kumpulan (Q79460869): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't meet the notability policy. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q26703844

[edit]

123fleurs (Q26703844): French ecommerce company, specialising in flower delivery: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124366517

[edit]

Sari Yoshida Setyoastri (Q124366517): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability guidelines WT20 (talk) 08:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q119702477

[edit]

Q119702477: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A couple of other websites mention it https://bougetonq.com/reussir-etudes-blog-aide-etudiants/ and 100K+ followers on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/rmetudes/ Exilexi (talk) 09:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q119702478

[edit]

Q119702478: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought a registered national association, organizer of notable events (eg. Melee tournament at Cannes Winter Clash) and the topic of a radio interview, would be notable for Wikidata. I am not fully in the clear of what the notability criteria are and will comply with any decision, of course! Exilexi (talk) 09:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Exilexi It help adding references to the statements, such as reference URL (P854). Fralambert (talk) 18:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q71143144

[edit]

Rédaction d'articles web dans une stratégie de netlinking (Q71143144): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, this was not published in any journal. Dorades (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q112180809

[edit]

Wikipédia:1Lib1Ref/Univ. Eiffel/2022 (Q112180809): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 23:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124395025

[edit]

SPINA-DI (Q124395025): static disposition index, estimate for the loop gain of insulin-glucose homeostasis: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? WT20 (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Described by serious source. Infrastruktur (talk) 07:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124394788

[edit]

Sterling Industries (USA) (Q124394788): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? WT20 (talk) 18:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The parent organization is notable, might be okay. EPIC (talk) 13:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They both are the same company! it's a duplicated entity! Sammysonic (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q71135987

[edit]

Stratégie de référencement 2016 (Q71135987): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. This was not published in any journal. Dorades (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q7302845

[edit]

Record Union (Q7302845): Swedish record label: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124395843

[edit]

Rahm Khat (Q124395843): composer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? WT20 (talk) 05:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per IMDb he has composed music for multiple notable movies, so probably notable. EPIC (talk) 13:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124395960

[edit]

Jamie Bagley (Q124395960): Australian Businessman: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? WT20 (talk) 05:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124400156

[edit]

Lucie d'Auvergne (Q124400156): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty WT20 (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Her spouse is notable. Might be okay as long as references are provided EPIC (talk) 20:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124400070

[edit]

Marcel de Monfreid (Q124400070): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty WT20 (talk) 18:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
His father is notable. Might be okay as long as references are provided EPIC (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See my comment here, I may have found usable references. –FlyingAce✈hello 17:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124400067

[edit]

Lucien de Monfreid (Q124400067): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty WT20 (talk) 18:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
His father is notable. Might be okay as long as references are provided EPIC (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He may be a hoax, as he is not mentionaled in fr:Henry de Monfreid. Fralambert (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fralambert: I've found the sons mentioned here and here, but I'd rather not rely on Google Translate – can you check if these are good sources? –FlyingAce✈hello 17:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122915697

[edit]

arrears annuity (Q122915697): cash flows over periods where the first payment comes at the end of the first period (as opposed to at the start of the first period): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 23:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notable in my opinion. Type of payment arrangement for an annuity loan, which is helpful for understanding the structure of annuity loans in general, as well as annuity loans versus other loan types. Some mentions: investopedia accountingtools Sauer202 (talk) 08:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Rumblesushi

[edit]
  1. Q116816877 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q117313328 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q117765840 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q116816383 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q117843947 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q117075917 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q117813175 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q117313551 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q116948952 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q117470272 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 10:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notable per WD:N. If you ask/aren't sure, write on Wikidata:Bar, not here. 178.37.205.142 20:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q19042715

[edit]

Clever Gretel (Q19042715): English translation of Grimm fairy tale: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a specific edition of the work, it was just an unsourced text copypasted to Wikisource from somewhere. After it was deleted there, it can be delete here, too. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 16:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, link removed. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124423758

[edit]

Brainware Analytics (Q124423758): Swiss IT company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotion WT20 (talk) 02:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111704289

[edit]

Mátyás Bizzer (Q111704289): (2003-) game designer; amateur filmmaker: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability --2804:14D:BAA0:93EC:1D8D:FA75:8BB:6FFC 14:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124473243

[edit]

MC Marks (Q124473243): Brazilian musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N. Kacamata (talk) 19:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Three million followers/subscribers on both Instagram and Youtube, as well as 1 billion Youtube views, seems to suggest some kind of notability. But, I don't know how strong the notability is in this case, however. EPIC (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Sounds like someone who could have had a WP page. Infrastruktur (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Infrastruktur They had a WP page, but it was deleted in a AfD for lack of notability. Having "millions of followers" is not enough to assert notability in the pt.WP. Kacamata (talk) 22:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q73389562

[edit]

Preface and acknowledgements (Q73389562): scientific article published on 01 November 2000: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There's a genuine question as to whether this entry should exist: it's about a scientific article which does not, properly, have a separate existence. It's just the 'preface and acknowledgments' section that somehow got classed as a separate article. Note that the DOI is in use in two entries. DS (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q115867377

[edit]

Polish noble family (Q115867377): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. No links. --Heroldicas (talk) 09:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see an editwar between you and @Чаховіч Уладзіслаў:. Why do not you both discuss it here instead of turning it into a potential conflict? And please do not blank pages. --Wolverène (talk) 10:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing to discuss about. The user you mentioned baselessly tries to split one article into two. That's why I'm writing here to ask you to remove it and settle the dispute. Heroldicas (talk) 12:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have to protect the item for a month, because of the continuous edit warring. Heroldicas, it is hard to 'settle the dispute' if you are just emptying the content. In this case, only the sysops will decide if the item and its statements are really useless or vice versa. Could you kindly explain us which item may have a contradiction with the nominated one? Also, in this edition the page meets the notability criterion #1. --Wolverène (talk) 06:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Theoretically. 1) If a noble family from an another part of Europe was relocated to Poland, might it have pretended to be labeled as a Szlachta family? 2) If a Szlachta family was relocated to a place away from Poland, would it still remain a Szlachta family, or would it labeled just as a Polish one instead? 3) Or would such families stop being labeled either szlachecki or Polish? I am not sure whether in the XIX century the nationality of noble families was determined by country of residence or by country of heritage. I do not still get the answers although they may help with resolving this issue. Not everyone is competent enough in matters of the Polish history. --Wolverène (talk) 13:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don't we usually merge synonyms? Why are we deleting this one? --RAN (talk) 15:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110439253

[edit]

Simon Gurney (Q110439253): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted from all other Wikipedia projects Ravensfire (talk) 02:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Though no description defined looks notable. ImtiazTopu (talk) 12:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Chapitre 7. La gloire du Petit

[edit]
  1. Q75027719 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q75032109 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 13:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q61716328

[edit]

Oliver Murphy (Q61716328): Founder & Managing Director at WeFix, a smartphone & tablet repair business in the United Kingdom.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails Wikidata notability  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Notable entrepreneur. He was one of the youngest contestants to receive investment on Dragons' Den. Plenty of UK local and national media coverage eg https://www.chelmsfordweeklynews.co.uk/news/10965969.dragon-invests-in-olivers-phone-repair-kit/ and https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/businessclub/10514549/Entrepreneur-finds-remedy-for-water-damaged-phones.html Piecesofuk (talk) 11:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124607692

[edit]

L’assurance, moteur stratégique du Crédit mutuel (Q124607692): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 17:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123684569

[edit]

Yuriho Omine (Q123684569): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Kasper Nordkvist

[edit]
  1. Q124208142 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q124451836 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q124209839 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q123524363 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 10:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fonts items are notable. 178.37.205.142 21:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124666348

[edit]

Marcel Terme (Q124666348): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, test Nastoshka (talk) 21:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Author of Le cinéma à Aimargues (Q124666307), but then all these were created by IP and have no sources. Fralambert (talk) 01:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124286548

[edit]

Marcelo Wilkorwsky (Q124286548): Uruguayan entrepreneur, digital marketing expert: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

SEO person spamming for his SEO services DS (talk) 22:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This individual is a recognized figure, extensively referenced by a plethora of highly reputable and globally recognized institutions and media outlets, including but not limited to Forbes, MIT, the U.S. Embassy, and the U.S. Department of State. The presence of such authoritative references underscores the notability and significance of the person in question, firmly establishing their relevance and importance. There is absolutely no valid ground for deletion; on the contrary, the wealth of reliable and esteemed sources advocating for their notability only reinforces the argument for the page's retention. 186.54.239.184 13:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This person is a legitimate and relevant figure in the fields of entrepreneurship and digital marketing. His acknowledgment by prestigious entities and his impact on the tech industry are clear indicators of his notability. The presence of verifiable information and his contribution to the industry fully justify retaining this element. 181.37.208.134 21:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep

Dear @DragonflySixtyseven,
I believe the deletion of Marcelo Wilkorwsky's Wikidata item may overlook his significant contributions and notability. As an acclaimed Uruguayan entrepreneur and digital marketing expert, his achievements include the "Innovators Under 35 - Latin America" award, with coverage in esteemed publications such as MIT Technology Review and the IDB. His startup, Oincs, is a notable application in Latin America. The references provided confirm his impact and notoriety, meeting Wikidata's notability requirements. I kindly ask for reevaluation of this deletion request, considering the verifiable evidence of Marcelo's professional significance.
Thank you for your consideration. suwiki (talk) 23:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep notable 178.37.205.142 21:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124623346

[edit]

Lognoné museum (Q124623346): digital museum dedicated to old watchmaking and jewelry: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which ones? Could not find any by searching on Commons and by querying for SDC. --Dorades (talk) 08:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please, check the references : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q124623346
https://www.wiki-rennes.fr/Claude_Lognon%C3%A9
https://www.leparisien.fr/etudiant/sortir/li-lognone-museum/
https://www.leparisien.fr/etudiant/sortir/rennes/eve-famille-lognone-de-la-course-a-l-innovation-aux-objets-d-art-de-haute-precision/
https://patrimoine.bzh/gertrude-diffusion/dossier/horloge/d119c787-f73c-4b34-b39e-560c74d6ac56
http://www.collections.musee-bretagne.fr/ark:/83011/FLMjo206889
https://www.pop.culture.gouv.fr/notice/merimee/IA35003135
https://assoce.fr/waldec/W354007784/LOGNON-MUSEUM
https://www.temoignages.re/chroniques/di-sak-na-pou-di/bourse-horlogere-du-pays-du-mont-saint-michel,107536
https://www.lesinfosdupaysgallo.com/2023/08/11/ploermel-appel-a-temoignages-il-veut-faite-revivre-le-passe-horloger-de-la-ville/ Kevlo007007 (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most of them don't even mention a museum. Please limit yourself to the ones actually dealing with the item's topic. --Dorades (talk) 08:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The ones dealing with the item topic : https://www.leparisien.fr/etudiant/sortir/li-lognone-museum/
https://www.net1901.org/annuaire-association/ville/Dol-de-Bretagne,35095/theme/PRESERVATION-DU-PATRIMOINE,81.html
https://assoce.fr/waldec/W354007784/LOGNON-MUSEUM Kevlo007007 (talk) 10:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q16819136

[edit]

Beshir Imanov (Q16819136): Azerbaijani colonel: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The article about subject has been deleted in Azerbaijani and English language Wikipedia due the discussion. Sura Shukurlu (talk) 14:22, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124527956

[edit]

Wang's News Talk (Q124527956): Internet News Commentary Group: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 16:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Not notable.--S8321414 (talk) 07:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124735501

[edit]

Demonstration after the murder of Alexey Navalny (2024-02-16, Vilnius) (Q124735501): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I don't think it's relevant for a separate WD item. A.Savin (talk) 11:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It`s separate demonstration. So it should have separate WD. PMG (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge it with Demonstration after the murder of Alexey Navalny (2024-02-16, Berlin) (Q124735497). They seem to be only one event. Fralambert (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Different demonstration. Items may be related but they should be different items, with different claims.--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124735500

[edit]

Demonstration after the murder of Alexey Navalny (2024-02-17, Bremen) (Q124735500): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I don't think it's relevant for a separate WD item. A.Savin (talk) 11:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It`s separate demonstration. So it should have separate WD. PMG (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge it with Demonstration after the murder of Alexey Navalny (2024-02-16, Berlin) (Q124735497). They seem to be only one event. Fralambert (talk) 23:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Different demonstration. Items may be related but they should be different items, with different claims.--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q108176371

[edit]
Francesco Filippini - Barche sulla spiaggia

Boats on the beach at Venice (Q108176371): painting by Francesco Filippini: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item created by Lake Como LTA; there doesn't seem to exist a painting with this title Horcrux (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping @Bovlb who deleted it and recreated it. Fralambert (talk) 02:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the delayed response. For some reason I did not see a notification.
This item was deleted for the same reason given above by Horcrux, but restored on request by @Jarekt in Topic:Xz183i74x04zx7bh. Bovlb (talk) 22:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The item is a place for storing metadata for File:Francesco Filippini - Barche sulla spiaggia (1892-93).jpg painting which was uploaded by User:Иван Богданов and used on bunch of Wikipedias, like for example in ca:Obra artística de Francesco Filippini. It was sold on auction in 2013, so there is at least one reliable source. The auction lists exhibitions where it was shown. --Jarekt (talk) 02:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The reason we delete items created by the Lake Como LTA is that they blend truth and fiction and it's therefore impossible to tell whether the created items are real or hoaxes. If an established user is willing to take on responsibility for (the reality of) an item, I'm happy to undelete.
As discussed at the topic linked above, it appears that there are ways Commons users use Wikidata items that are not readily apparent when we delete items. This is something we ought to fix. Bovlb (talk) 19:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q108184575

[edit]
Carlo Bazzi, Paesaggio

The afternoon landscape (Q108184575): painting by Carlo Bazzi: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I did not found any reliable source about the existence of this painting; the item was created by the Lake Como LTA Horcrux (talk) 15:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping @Bovlb who deleted it and recreated it. Fralambert (talk) 02:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the delayed response. For some reason I did not see a notification.
This item was deleted for the same reason given above by Horcrux, but restored on request by @Jarekt in Topic:Xz183i74x04zx7bh. Bovlb (talk) 22:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My role is maintenance of artwork metadata on Commons/Wikidata, the item was deleted leaving broken links from File:Carlo Bazzi, Paesaggio.jpg on Commons. The item was uploaded by User:Xalamea89, who also provided metadata, unfortunately without sources. I do not have art catalogs for Carlo Bazzi, so I can not easily verify the metadata. The painting seems to exist, and I found this source or this one, which might or might not be "reliable" enough. If the item gets deleted please move all the metadata which might be missing to Commons and remove link to the item. --Jarekt (talk) 02:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124537966

[edit]

Najmeddin Shariati (Q124537966): Television presenter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability and fake data --2804:14D:BAA0:93EC:F0A3:2F5D:8133:4384 15:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q95428917

[edit]

Habil Humbatov (Q95428917): International master of sports, honored coach: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N, created by promotion-only account Nemoralis (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete. --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 04:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment A sitelink (nominated for deletion) exists. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 19:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@KonstantinaG07, only sitelink is an empty Commons category (which is tagged for speedy deletion) Nemoralis (talk) 14:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q104211529

[edit]

Vinness A. Ollervides (Q104211529): Political activist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promoting. The dewiki(deleted), jawiki, zhwiki(deleted) and wikidata item are all created by same user IDERJEN. --Akishima Yuka (talk) 01:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, the person is a completely hoax. His birth name is Wu Dizhao, later changed to some Manchuria imperial surname Yi, and contacted as many as possible medium to report, and cover himself. All is fake. Akishima Yuka (talk) 01:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold A sitelink exists there. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 06:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123689937

[edit]

region of Western Sahara (Q123689937): A region of Western Sahara: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is not a real administrative entity (established by a State or a recognized institution). There are no recognized entities that should have this instance, except the ones established by the Moroccan State, which should have region of Morocco (Q845643). The disputed nature of the entities where region of Western Sahara (Q123689937) is used (Laâyoune-Sakia El Hamra (Q19951088) and Dakhla-Oued Ed-Dahab (Q21235104)), can be expressed through other properties. --Ideophagous (talk) 00:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:51, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep it's both a geographic region of Western Sahara (this is a fact) and a claimed "administrative entity" that covers what is claimed and occupied by Morocco as well as the liberated territories that are under the control of another state. The OP is aware that this has been discussed at length on the admin's board, so this nomination makes no sense. I will ping Koavf who is familiar with the mentioned discussion. M.Bitton (talk) 03:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leaning to keep as there is no reason why this has to be regions of Morocco's occupation in Western Sahara, but regions of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic in Western Sahara. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf In which database or administrative system is this concept used or defined? If it's not formally defined in such a system, then it's not an administrative territorial entity (Q56061). Note the description: territorial entity for administration purposes, with or without its own local government, as well as the property part of (P361) => hierarchy of administrative territorial entities (Q4057633). You could argue for "geographic region of Western Sahara", but it's pointless to have this item only for two entities, when the same idea can be captured by simply using location properties and such. Furthermore, the two aformentioned regions are only defined with their names and borders within the Moroccan administrative system. Is SADR officially dividing Western Sahara in the exact same way with the same borders and names? Ideophagous (talk) 09:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They are not. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see no point in repeating what was discussed ad nauseam, including on the admin's board. M.Bitton (talk) 00:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q93303092

[edit]

Alexander Dawson Henderson III (Q93303092): American business leader, financier, and Air Force officer (1924-2020): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

An entry that originated from a non-notable subject on enWiki that has since been deleted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alexander_D._Henderson_III --Graywalls (talk) 00:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They're all linked from entries created by one user who created a walled garden of things about his family tree. Graywalls (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Wikidata allows anyone that can be described by "reliable and public sources" to have an entry. This is independent of English Wikipedia notability standards. The only restriction is info on living minors, a limitation on creating an entry for yourself, and restrictions on entries created as paid promotion. Genealogy is welcome and encouraged. --RAN (talk) 18:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q91949506

[edit]

Patricia Ford Crass (Q91949506): American artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted specifically for failing notability on en.wiki. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Patricia_Ford_Crass --Graywalls (talk) 00:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They're all linked from entries created by one user who created a walled garden of things about his family tree. Graywalls (talk) 01:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This item is also part of the metadata of a number of images on Wikimedia Commons:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/entity/M89038881, https://commons.wikimedia.org/entity/M89487501, https://commons.wikimedia.org/entity/M89507260, https://commons.wikimedia.org/entity/M90553347, https://commons.wikimedia.org/entity/M109289544 Piecesofuk (talk) 07:31, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q76236360

[edit]

Alice Dawson-Damer (Q76236360): (born 2004): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This page is about me. I did not give permission for it. I have removed the properties, but would like the page removed. --203.153.206.214 02:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:51, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't blank the item. If you think that this item violate our Living people policy, you should proably contact a oversight. Fralambert (talk) 22:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is that this person is apparently a member of the British peerage, such that a very detailed and exhaustive listing would include her name. If this entry were to be deleted, I find it plausible that it would be created again, by some completionist who decided "oh, she's in the peerage, we should have an entry on her". As long as "is a member of the peerage" is sufficient to justify an entry, it doesn't matter whether this entry is deleted, because someone will eventually write it again. DS (talk) 01:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Her father is the heir apparent of the current w:Earl of Portarlington. She is not mentioned on that page.--Auric (talk) 23:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless, she's in ThePeerage.com. If this entry is deleted, I won't be the one to re-create it, but will someone else? DS (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are links from two items, but no Wikipedia article for either (or for the current Earl of Portarlington, only a redirect to the title). A member of the peerage would be notable, but ThePeerage.com includes many other people, usually related to members of the peerage. It is also not a reliable source (it is deprecated in Wikipedia, and at least one hoax article in Wikipedia had a second Wikidata item based on an entry there). Missing entries from some databases should be added again, but this is expected to be always incomplete (Q21873886) and is not a Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316). I noticed DoBIH Number (P6515) is a Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320) as it's a self-published source - should The Peerage person ID (P4638) have the same, for the reasons we have a Wikidata:Living people policy, whereas the DoBIH is a database of hills, almost all of which will be notable? Peter James (talk) 23:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a self-published source, we should at least add Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320) to the property. This is not as important as a biographical dictionary (Q1787111) who all entries have the possibility to be a article on Wikipedia. Fralambert (talk) 01:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just a reminder that we have a warning template for editors who blank items. Bovlb (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --RAN (talk) 18:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q120229700

[edit]

Yuka Estrada (Q120229700): American illustration editor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This individual is one of the named contributors to Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change (Q60451191), though as there the author is given as Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Q171183) I'm not sure how to add the individual authors. I'll ask at Wikidata:WikiProject Climate Change how this should be done. Dsp13 (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Friends with the Weather

[edit]
  1. Q110400029 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q110399544 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q117840901

[edit]

Tanzir Islam Britto (Q117840901): Bangladeshi physician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person, previously deleted item Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2024/02/20#Q117840901

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2024/01/28#Q124269284
You can read both discussions. One Hundred Years of Solitude (talk) 22:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC) Sock of Tanzir Islam Britto, see Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tanzir Islam Britto.[reply]

*:It's very confusing because facts and sources have now become invalid. I am writing a research article on Wikipedia and its management process. I discussed banning and blocking. In more than 60% of cases, a user loses his/her access just because of a guess. And there are no standard criteria for credibility. If an admin says something is not credible, it gets deleted. its just facts; do not get angry with me. I do not have any financial gain from wikis. I am doing research, and as a PhD student, I found this sector interesting. And Google heavily depends on this foundation. So, few people regulate, which will come first on the Google pages. One Hundred Years of Solitude (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC) Sock of Tanzir Islam Britto, see Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tanzir Islam Britto.[reply]

 Keep
Speculation and suspicion..... Why? Why complicate things, life by doing these...... I said I took his photo. He is my Brother. We now have no communication due to some legal issues. Our inlaws are fighting with each other and my parents. I am feeling so ashamed that I had to disclose so many private things about my and my brother's life.
My brother is a fighter. He wrote books, got the job he loved, he became a physician, trained outside, worked with various castes and religions of people. In Fought with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. If is is not the hero, notable, i do not know who is.
He survived cancer, he fought, got chemotherapy, bone marrow transplant. He survived. He picked up his book, he vomited, then again picked up text books, kept doing that, cause in his CV line, chemo was running.
He passed the Secondary and Higher secondary school certificate exam, without any coaching, tutour, nothing. He just kept reading. The goal was fixed, to be a Doctor.
He became one. I know he is not credible, because his work is not published in the Guardian, Times. He is not a rich youtuber or ambani. He just saves lives everyday, that's all.
My brother is a cheerful man, he got married, and now he is facing divorce. so, during this time, he thought, let's get busy with something purposeful.
He only wanted to write. He created wikidata entry, he thought its like Facebook or linkedin. He created multiple accounts because he thought it was ISP's problem. That id is gone. And few he opened because of fun.
Yeah, he is now a sock. I am not defending him. But as a human being, after watching all these, anyone wants that the story should be heard. Millions of children who hasCancer will get the strength.
No, we will not talk about that. we will talk about duck, sock, ban, block.
I am ready, harsh words, block, ban..... but truth will always be the truth.
I live on the 4th floor.
My brother is on the 2nd floor.
We have the same router.
I apologize for this tone. He is an introvert, very shy. He will accept anything. He is a positive person. I am sorry that he messed up your site.
P:S: By Court, my parents separated everything between us, with one condition. My inlaws and I must not have any contact with my brother…… and yeah, it's Bangladesh, we value our marriage and society, we even give up our brother to save those.
But he did not. He got separated, Got accepted for MRCP part-1, he lives with my parents, i come and go….. He goes to hospital at 6:00 am, sometimes at 1:00am at night he comes back, sometimes after 1-2 days. We have 0 connection between us.
Except the router and some ids which are now I do not know where. We used to edit,create pages like back 2009-10, my brother became so interested that he went insane. He sat with a dictionary, and tried to find which words has no article.
But he relapsed…..again he fought.
Anyways, I am a trainee in Dhaka Medical College. Yeah, I am also….. But please, do not speculate, suspect. It's so sad…..
Now decide guys, erase him? The bad person he is…..or let people know, you can be anything, you can fight like hell, like this man…..
P:S: My brother is in the hospital right now. He has no idea about these. I know you will prove ip, tools etc….. But yes, he is a fighter. Thats all. History will tell his tale….. Omadacycline (talk) 12:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Sock of Tanzir Islam Britto, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/সিডাটিভ হিপনোটিক্স/Archive, Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tanzir Islam Britto[reply]
 Keep
Published Author
1.A Systematic Review on Childhood Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: An Overlooked Phenomenon in the Health and Research Sector of Bangladesh.[1]
2.A Systematic Review of Pediatric Dialysis in Asia: Unveiling Demographic Trends, Clinical Representation, and Outcomes.[2]
3. Association of Ventricular Extension and Short Term Outcome in Primary Intracerebral Haemorrhage. [3]
He is pretty famous in Bangladesh. One Hundred Years of Solitude (talk) 23:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC) Sock of Tanzir Islam Britto, see Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tanzir Islam Britto.[reply]
  1. ↑ https://www.lens.org/lens/scholar/article/063-216-088-355-007/main
  2. ↑ https://www.lens.org/lens/scholar/article/006-867-262-456-471/main
  3. ↑ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373162535_Association_of_Ventricular_Extension_and_Short_Term_Outcome_in_Primary_Intracerebral_Haemorrhage

Q50415866

[edit]

Tarkhan Pashazade (Q50415866): Photographer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. --Gadir (talk) 04:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q61943628

[edit]

Larvor (Q61943628): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Hopala! (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q86819658

[edit]

Nieuwendijk (Q86819658): Dutch photographer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No identifying data, this could be about anyone with the last-name Nieuwendijk, and there are many. I am sorry, that some organization in my country dumped a lot of shit on Wikidata, this is clearly not according to wikidara rules. Paulbe (talk) 01:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ Paulbe: please do not modify items before nominating for deletion. we need to look at the item in its original state BrokenSegue (talk) 03:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The property proposal says "eventually complete" and deleting items conflicts with that. Peter James (talk) 12:20, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the author of the slide show 'DE NEDERLANDSE MUSEA EN HUN ONTSTAAN.' created in 1950. According to the museum of world cultures Nieuwendijk is the photographer of the slides and the publisher. This work is in the collection of Museum of Worls Cultures and has an persistent identifier https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11840/pi63487 with a backlink to Wikidata. More information about this person is unfortunately not known yet online but could be available in the future. Hannolans (talk) 23:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124987813

[edit]

Bijan Alizadehfard (Q124987813): Entrepreneur and Business Magnet on Blockchain Ecosystem. CEO of Phoenix Group: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Lymantria (talk) 06:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a reaction by the item creator at my user talk. --Lymantria (talk) 07:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125054329

[edit]

Coinbase Pro (Q125054329): sunset cryptocurrency trading platform operated by Coinbase: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notable product of Coinbase, described at various points in the Coinbase article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coinbase#:~:text=cryptocurrencies%5B38%5D-,Coinbase%20Pro,-%2C%20a%20professional%20asset Iamcarbon (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Iamcarbon Just because it’s a product of something it cannot stand on its own for an article. Especially with crypto as it’s only an algorithm that will be replaced within days or weeks. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 01:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This was a cryptocurrency trading platform operated continuously by a Fortune 500 company (Coinbase) under various names (GDAX, Coinbase Pro, and now Coinbase Advanced Trade) since 2015 -- and responsible for a notable percentage of cryptocurrency trading volume. I think this gives it more notability than an algorithm. Iamcarbon (talk) 02:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding references. Unfortunately I can't really judge their seriousness. --Dorades (talk) 13:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added an one additional reference to the Wall Street Journal, which covers a lawsuit alleging that Coinbase Pro trading platform illegally inflated trading volumes. This received quite a bit of press coverage.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/coinbase-to-pay-6-5-million-to-settle-cftc-investigation-over-trading-11616192411
--
This item was added to import a Google Knowledge Graph entity, and looked notable (given the mention in Wikipedia), but will leave it to the community from here to decide. Iamcarbon (talk) 06:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I see a lot of coverage of coinbase pro on the Internet. I'll grant you that most of them aren't very reputable but there are just so many of them. E.g. mentioned in [1] BrokenSegue (talk) 14:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q116919859

[edit]

Recai Karagöz (Q116919859): Turkish director: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Wooze 18:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q86993242

[edit]

Natalia Guerrero (Q86993242): journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111418326

[edit]

Juliano Teruel (Q111418326): Athlete: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 11:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124504863

[edit]

Last Tango (Q124504863): Exhibition space in Zurich, Switzerland: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 09:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Notable, passes at least WDN3 as a number of Wikipedia articles refer to it, for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marlene_McCarty#Can_I_Borrow_Your_Hole_at_Last_Tango,_Zurich,_Switzerland,_11_Sep_%E2%80%93_19_Dec_2020 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfredo_Aceto and passes WDN2, for example https://www.on-curating.org/issue-48-reader/hidden-spaces-and-heavy-satin-last-tango.html and https://contemporarylynx.co.uk/independent-art-stage-in-switzerland Piecesofuk (talk) 14:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q114167887

[edit]

Broughton, Proposed Village Hall (Q114167887): village hall in Scottish Borders, Scotland, UK: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not really any point in having this on wikidata, it was proposed and never built, and isn't notable. RedAuburn (talk) 11:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Shouldn't Canmore ID (P718) made it notable? Fralambert (talk) 00:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request

[edit]
  1. Q125313049 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q125313082 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable parent and child. Barely identifiable. William Graham (talk) 15:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: advertising items created by Jminot92

[edit]
  1. Q61727605 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q61786999 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q81275496 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q61787600 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q82240740 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q112116303 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Advertisement items, don't seem notable. William Graham (talk) 16:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Buyagift (Q61727605) Notable business, plenty of coverage online eg, https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2006/aug/09/shopping.consumerpages https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/moonpig-splashes-out-14m-on-gift-experience-firms-7q0mgmvwn https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-click-cbwhrws5q8p https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1478745/How-to-lord-it-over-your-friends-for-only-29.99.html/1000 Piecesofuk (talk) 17:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125418773

[edit]

Neil Patel (Q125418773): online marketer, SEO expert and author: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, possibly recreation of Q118612591. Lymantria (talk) 05:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Clearly notably, eg demonstrated by the Times of India reference. Piecesofuk (talk) 07:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Times of India link is clearly an "advertorial". --Lymantria (talk) 11:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
quote from the article "a New York Times bestselling author", eg https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/2016/10/09/business-books/ I've also added a number of external IDs that demonstrate notability Piecesofuk (talk) 12:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Notable. ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 16:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(viaf cluster id's et al) ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 16:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree it looks like a recreation of Q118612591, but it now has some references and identifiers. Should probably be considered together with:
Bovlb (talk) 21:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q113556524

[edit]

Julia Burch (Q113556524): Canadian Internet influencer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2MM followers on instagram seems reasonable? BrokenSegue (talk) 17:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It does. Infrastruktur (talk) 06:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q116821085

[edit]

Elkhan Bashirov (Q116821085): Azerbaijan businessman: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The articles on this subject have been deleted on Azerbaijani and English Wikipedia. The subject isn't notable. Sura Shukurlu (Talk) 20:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to see references in the statement for the received awards, then it might be pretty enough to confirm notability of the subject in Wikidata. --Wolverène (talk) 06:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125454177

[edit]

Modjaji Books, South Africa (Q125454177): a publishing company in south Africa: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability / promo Rockpeterson (talk) 10:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125162101

[edit]

Shayan Safe (Q125162101): Iranian Rapper, Audio Engineer , Producer, Manager: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Arian (talk) 14:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This person is an Iranian rapper and producer and the deletion request is not correct and the entered information is completely correct
https://shayansafe.com/
https://isni.org/isni/000000051430247X
https://g.co/kgs/syDhqNm PersianRapGenius (talk) 07:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This person is an Iranian rapper and producer and the deletion request is not correct and the entered information is completely correct PersianRapGenius (talk) 07:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125374827

[edit]

Flemish Republic (Q125374827): proposed state in Flanders: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is a non-existent concept. RVA2869 (talk) 19:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is... I added a reference Jhowie Nitnek 19:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125125591

[edit]

Q125125591: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Crosswiki spam Leonidlednev (talk) 22:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold until the ttwiki article is deleted. –FlyingAce✈hello 05:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noting that the speedy deletion request in ttwiki has not been resolved yet. –FlyingAce✈hello 22:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Boowa & Kwala

[edit]
Extended content
  1. Q23906515 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q96333022 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q96333026 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q96333032 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q96333037 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q96329861 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q96481958 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q96482173 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q96481965 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q96324255 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q96482133 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q96332827 (delete | history | links | logs)
  13. Q96332856 (delete | history | links | logs)
  14. Q96332878 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 10:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Boowa & Kwala (Q23906515) Notable pre-school animation series, eg see https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/2001/03/21/www-boowakwala-com_165091_1819218.html and https://www.awn.com/news/boowa-kwala-make-their-us-debut-dvd Piecesofuk (talk) 15:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122912457

[edit]

CoRDI 2023 - Blogpost (Q122912457): A blog post on https://sven-lieber.org: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 11:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
that blog post is a conceptual entity and it is described by serious and publicly available references: it has a DOI identifier and as a piece of scholarly communication is referenced by Crossref, The Rogue Scholar as well as in social media. Furthermore, a copy of it is available in the Internet archive.
I would argue that this makes it indeed notable, especially comparing it to most of the currently 2262 instances of blog posts on Wikidata. SvenLieber (talk) 07:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, how can these references be considered "serious" if they are created by yourself? We would need some independent source that makes it possible to evaluate the notability of your texts (e. g. referenced in scientific texts, published in a peer-reviewed journal, etc.). In general, this is not about the quality or importance of your texts, but about their notability according to WD:N. --Dorades (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Blog posts being added probably happened because Wikidata seems unable to define what level of granularity is appropriate for different classes of things, provided there is no Wikipedia page. Infrastruktur (talk) 06:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124732992

[edit]

Giacomo Ugarelli (Q124732992): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Ovruni (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-notable, contains now 1-URL with verified account (https://athletesusa.org/user/giacomo-ugarelli/) ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 16:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q109433469

[edit]

I ask that this be deleted because it does not identify myself as a figure, or a famous public figure, lacks references, and is not well known.thank 🍃Zulf🍃talk 16:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
on the local wiki falls under the quick deletion criteria 🍃Zulf🍃talk 19:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Zulf on Indonesian Wikipedia it says the actor has played in quite an extensive list of movies/TV programmes. Are you absolutely sure he's not notable? --Fordaemdur (talk) 19:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q61119273

[edit]

I ask that this be deleted Q61119273, because it does not identify myself as a figure, or a famous public figure, lacks references, and is not well known.thank 🍃Zulf🍃talk 16:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
on the local wiki falls under the quick deletion criteria 🍃Zulf🍃talk 19:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Zulf per previous deletion request, on Indonesian Wikipedia there's a quite extensive filmography for this actor. Are you absolutely sure he's not notable? --Fordaemdur (talk) 19:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q116907159

[edit]

Marius Heinrich (Q116907159): German rapper, singer, and songwriter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N --Morneo06 (talk) 17:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The item's history confuses me. Was this item repurposed? Is one or all of the contributors paid (cf. User:InquisitiveMindset)? What happened to all the identifiers of the Marius Heinrich this item was representing in the beginning? Are they the same person? Why did a published computer scientist revoke his ORCID? --Dorades (talk) 19:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, this publication and another one are not peer-reviewed and seem to be self-published. --Dorades (talk) 19:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello I have entered all the information on the page to the best of my knowledge and ability, based on the data I could find on the internet. However, I did not consider the possibility of a name conflict or that the information might overlap with that of other individuals. If the page does not meet the standards, or if I have made any mistakes, I kindly request its removal. Sorry InquisitiveMindset (talk) 19:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be a connection to Q108520425. Could also be the same person as Q125622939. --Dorades (talk) 19:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q115820956

[edit]

natural matter (Q115820956): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Currently, it's only used once as class, and it makes the class tree more complex. There's no need for it and it's not used consistently. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 12:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q114869071

[edit]

de-Satanization (Q114869071): atonement for the sins of the ancestors: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No relaible source; fictional concept; incorrect opposition. WildStranger (talk) 20:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This item linkef from single other, and this link seems to be the purpose of its creation in principle.
This look as fantasy esotherical concept, that is incorrerctly (without reliable sources) applied to contemporary military topics. WildStranger (talk) 21:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. This is incoherent. The only kernel of notability here is that some Russian propaganda has claimed "de-Satanization" as a goal of their invasion of Ukraine, but I'm not convinced this is a distinct enough concept (or even a true enough statement) to represent as an entity. Not every political talking point is independently notable.
Even if this is kept, it needs to be cleaned up heavily to focus on the specific concept as used as a justification for the invasion of Ukraine, not the general (and practically tautological) concept of religious opposition to symbols of evil. Statements like "Participant: Cain and Abel" or the description as "atonement for the sins of the ancestors" are nonsensical. Omphalographer (talk) 19:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q33082483

[edit]

Family Teamwork (Q33082483): 1946; Frith Films; C; Sd; 18:00;: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Might be notable, it appears to be a short documentary by Emily Benton Frith (Q76465655) https://archive.org/details/0786_Family_Teamwork_05_18_08_00 Piecesofuk (talk) 16:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125676121

[edit]

Rhys Southern (Q125676121): Australian Entrepreneur, Marketer and Public Speaker: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 06:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not finished with this one and have more referencing to add, but he seems to meet all of the notability requirements, though is not particularly famous - is that a policy? I cannot see it anywhere.
Not sure what the link is that I am seeing is to a dental practice in relation to this entity? ELdEL69 (talk) 10:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I assume you are referring to the notability requirements stated on WD:N, which ones does this item meet in your view? Being famous is not part of the criteria.
I don't get which link "to a dental practice" you mean? --Dorades (talk) 16:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to assume whatever you like, it has no bearing whatsoever on this conversation.
Is it not? So, then I guess that means that this guy meets the requirements then - just like every other entity on this planet, past/present and future - as he is clearly distinguishable from other entities. Or is there something I have missed about what an entity is and that Wikidata is about cataloguing them to help Wiki projects?
Specifically in the notability requirements it state "...to centralize interlanguage links across Wikimedia projects and to serve as a general knowledge base for the world at large'...if it meets at least one of the three criteria below..."
That means any entity is worth of inclusion, but meets notability for wikidata straight away if it has already been included on another wiki project - as you can see in the statements, I found an image of him on wikidata. ELdEL69 (talk) 08:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What a coincidence that you found an image on Commons that was uploaded two minutes before you added it here. I will refrain from explaining anything about WD:N to you since "it has no bearing whatsoever on this conversation". --Dorades (talk) 16:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This guy is in Debrett's Peerage and Baronetage - and I am pretty sure that trumps 99% of other references sources uses for notability in any Wikiproject. I had nothing to do with that image, and had not noticed the upload time or date. I can see it's been deleted though - just a co-incidence, is it? Like the two random comments below, made at the same time. That is more than a little suspicious and by the look of it, goes against the spirit of Wiki projects, doesn't it? ELdEL69 (talk) 23:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as non-notable and promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 15:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Doesn't appear notable and I don't think that the distant relatives qualify for structural need. --William Graham (talk) 15:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep clearly notable, I found him in Debrett's ELdEL69 (talk) 01:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Greetings from Commons. I came here to nominate this for deletion as spam and saw it was already nominated. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This item should be kept because it meets Wikidata's notability criteria. It is linked to a significant topic with verifiable sources, and is mentioned in the Debrett's Baronetage and Peerage. Louissiebert (talk) 13:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125469572

[edit]

The Rashid Khan (Q125469572): CEO of TRK Studios: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person, creator has claimed on enwiki to have been paid to promote them across Wikimedia projects (and has also been blocked for socking to do so) Belbury (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What the hell is this, you are deleting my created articals and other wikis project, also blocked me from wiki without any reason. I dosen't said anytime that i am promoting any thing through wikipedia, you just adding this by yourself. Amirdelv (talk) 05:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Non-notable and promotional. Jamie7687 (talk) 16:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have created an antispam report at meta:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#The_Rashid_Khan/TRK_Studios/The_Mars/Itrk70. Jamie7687 (talk) 13:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125723487

[edit]

Topaz Marketing & Distributing Co. (Q125723487): Print media distributor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Morneo06 (talk) 18:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep strcutural need for Afro-American Gazette (Q125491127). Fralambert (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123456657

[edit]

Rahama Musa Bungudu (Q123456657): lawyer and campaigner for human rights: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails Wikidata notability  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125621683

[edit]

Wasiul Bahar (Q125621683): Wikimedian, Organizer, Photographer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is that item helpful for this purpose if there is not even a birth date stated? --Dorades (talk) 22:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks for pointing this out. Sorry, I'm not very knowledgeable about Wikidata as I mostly work on Commons. Many of my fellow wikimedian, photographers have wikidata items, and I used those items as references. Please let me know if there is anything to add or remove from this particular item. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 15:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q62018297

[edit]

Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Fordham/WomenHistory (Q62018297): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N/EC - enwiki meetup Solidest (talk) 20:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not so sure -- there is the Commons category. --Wolverène (talk) 04:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q50376138

[edit]

Heino Jõesaar (Q50376138): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Old item, bot-generated. Should be not notable, given that no further info in web (https://www.geni.com/people/Heino-J%C3%B5esaar-Dreverk/6000000007775750397) Estopedist1 (talk) 12:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125693411

[edit]

Maja Wiśniewska (Q125693411): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Someone thought it was a good idea to put their one-year old on the internet. Problematic wrt WD:LP. Infrastruktur (talk) 14:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I don't see anything in WD:LP to suggest that this item shouldn't be added to Wikidata. It passes WDN3 and the information contained within it is available in publicly accessible sources and also in the two Polish Wikipedia articles https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friz and https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wersow Piecesofuk (talk) 09:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I would say that the item whould be more probeblatic with LP if the source was from social medias. But it seem to be from newspapers. Fralambert (talk) 23:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: source doesn't indicate any stand-alone notability, we have no evidence the child itself is okay with having their personal information shared now or in the future. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125791432

[edit]

Mahmoud Omar (Q125791432): Head of Growth: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 13:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dorades Please do not delete it. He is one of the famous figures among the Arabs and is an actor. Please tell me what I did wrong and how to fix it?
A page named "نديم بركات" was also deleted, and he is also a well-known person. How can I recover it? Or write about it again Khidrsalam (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this item does not demonstrate notability according to the guidelines (WD:N). If it doesn't meet at least one of the three notability criteria, it will probably be deleted.
Also, I noticed that you are apparently using more than one account. This would be against our rules. Is my assumption correct?
To request the undeletion of an item, please read Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion. --Dorades (talk) 12:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thank you Khidrsalam (talk) 12:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q32860792

[edit]

Pokémon fictional location (Q32860792): area in the Pokémon franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redundant. Use fictional location (Q3895768) instead Trade (talk) 17:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124810095

[edit]

Mayukh Mukherjee (Q124810095): Actor and Academic: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Article deleted from all wikipedia sites Ravensfire (talk) 20:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: non-notable web series and episodes

[edit]
  1. Q125447540 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q125901298 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q125902599 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q125902601 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q125902602 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q125927717 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q125927719 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q125927720 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

non-notable and promotional items, associated with Q125469572, Q125768759, and this sockpuppet investigation on enwiki Jamie7687 (talk) 15:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The mentioned items are not promotional or non-notable. Below are some of reference source associated with this items :
These are some source associated with these items. If not enough then i can provide more. Loischaa (talk) 16:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These appear to establish promotional activity, not notability. A larger number of links is not needed; rather, we need links to reliable sources that cannot be easily influenced by a person looking to promote their content. Not all of these links even work; if the TMDB link ever worked, somebody at TMDB may have decided that this doesn't meet their standards, either. Jamie7687 (talk) 17:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok i understand, wait at least a week before deleting. Because production side conformed that the series is closely telecast in CIS countries officially. So may be the OTT source is better according to your conditions.
Here the trailer link, if the official YouTube channel is consider as notable :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6xovLGrz-c Loischaa (talk) 18:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Having an "official" YouTube channel absolutely does not establish notability, nor do vague claims from "production side" — we need reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Thanks, Jamie7687 (talk) 07:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Loischaa You should proably read User:Bovlb/How to create an item on Wikidata so that it won't get deleted. Fralambert (talk) 16:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I have created an antispam report at meta:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#The_Rashid_Khan/TRK_Studios/The_Mars/Itrk70. Jamie7687 (talk) 13:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125901596

[edit]

The Mars Season 1 (Q125901596): season of television series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Season of non-notable web series Jamie7687 (talk) 15:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(which are nominated in a bulk request above) Jamie7687 (talk) 16:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
wait before deleting any item, i will provide referencing source for there items shortly. Loischaa (talk) 16:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here are links of Wikipedia articles in different language, of item The Mars (Q125447540) which is parent item of The Mars Season 1 (Q125901596) :
Wikipedia article for the nominated items may be created if any editor want to create. Loischaa (talk) 16:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note for others: all of these articles were created by Amirdelv (talk • contribs • logs), an account blocked indefinitely on enwiki and simplewiki in relation to w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Itrk70. Jamie7687 (talk) 13:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have created an antispam report at meta:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#The_Rashid_Khan/TRK_Studios/The_Mars/Itrk70. Jamie7687 (talk) 13:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
what does it mean? Loischaa (talk) 15:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125118469

[edit]

William Francis Norton (Q125118469): (1857-1939) American author: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable person. Created as part of a personal crusade by Richard Norton to create items on Wikidata and upload files on Commons related to "apparent" (though disputed) relatives. By creating items on Wikidata, linked from Commons, these items were artificially made to be "on scope" but they are not. The files are up for discussion at Commons too, because they are only linked from Wikidata, in an obvious effort to get these items and files on scope on both projects, deceiving the rules of both projects.

This request also includes:

William Francis Norton (1857-1939) memoir (Q125118675): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Agnes Gertrude Norton (Q125118971): (1881-1969): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Gerard Francis Norton (Q125943489): (1902-1986): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

William Norton (Q125973531): (1809-1891) husband of Margaret Feeney: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Margaret Feeney (Q125973633): (1812-1891) wife of William Naughton: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

--Bedivere (talk) 17:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think all of RAN's creations should be carefully reviewed. As I've pointed out at commons:COM:AN/U I've come across several categories on Commons linking to Wikidata items solely for the purpose of generating a genealogical tree. This means they have created several dozens of these items for irrelevant people, creating a Commons category or the like, for them to be in scope in both projects. --Bedivere (talk) 17:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep As creator, this appears to be part of a harassment/punishment/revenge campaign against me over this edit. It is being performed in tandem with nominating hundreds of uploads at Commons. Its a very clever form of harassment, you can nominate an entire category in a few seconds and the uploader will spend months defending the images. See: Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ). It is an abuse of power by someone with admin rights, they don't have the temperament for the role, a single edit disagreement has turned into a long term campaign of harassment and revenge for disagreeing with them. By adding "I think all of RAN's creations should be carefully reviewed" they are trying to recruit others to harass me. Wikidata notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." --RAN (talk) 02:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm beginning to get tired of you playing the victim role when it's been you who has been playing with the rules. More over, you accuse me of starting a harassment campaign only because you've been caught misusing Wikidata and Commons? How can holding you accountable be anywhere near harassing? You have a problem by failing to respond serious questions and issues. Now, on the Commons, you claim again I started a harassment campaign "now" when this was started nearly two days ago. I would like to get an apology from you for all these personal attacks but I doubt I will get them. Whatever, I am not participating anymore in this discussion, neither on Commons. You should stop the drama and start to work collaboratively without attacking others. Have a good day. Bedivere (talk) 06:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I apologize for implying that your harassment campaign started "now" when, as you wrote, you started it "nearly two days ago". I hope that misunderstanding has been cleared up. --RAN (talk) 16:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There is no harassment campaign. That is what you should apologize for. You, like all of us, can be held accountable for your actions and that is all I've been doing. Bedivere (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Others have questioned your actions and whether you have the temperament and maturity to have access to admin tools: "[this] is the sort of action that raises very real concerns over the fitness of an admin." See: here, over the kneejerk nomination of 423 images and threating blockage over a single edit disagreement. --RAN (talk) 06:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Could somebody please block this guy? They've been harassing me for over a week. Bedivere (talk) 05:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete These items are an attempt of using Wikidata as personal genealogy service. Ankry (talk) 02:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't "a personal genealogy service", the entries on humans are available for anyone to use in whatever educational purposes they need. Other serious and public databases of humans used for educational purposes: Findagrave with 230 million entries on humans, and Familysearch with over 500 million entries on humans. Wikidata has about 10 million entries on humans. We only have restrictions on living humans involved in self promotion, and restrictions on private information on living humans. None of the individuals are living. --RAN (talk) 01:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per Ankry; this kind of circular "notability" i.e., the categories on Commons are notable because of the Wikidata item which is notable because of Commons, is pretty ridiculous, and I'm surprised there isn't a policy to cover this. RAN should give actual uses of the people described on actual sitelinks, not this circular nonsense. Matrix (talk) 20:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't a vote, you need to cite policy, not "I'm surprised there isn't a policy to cover this", but actual policy, not your suggestions for future policy. Wikidata notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." Is your argument that the references are not public, or that they are not serious? There is no requirement that any contributor: "give actual uses of the people described". I am not even sure what "actual uses" means, perhaps something like Wikipedia:Notability, where you need to be "famous". --RAN (talk) 00:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it was pretty clear I was mentioning Wikidata:Notability. But yes, there are no serious and publicly available references. There are millions of people with geanalogy certificates and records, it is by no means a serious reference. Your addition of Fandom content to the first Q doesn't count either as a user-generated source from a "semantic wiki for genealogy" that allows you "you [to] keep your family history research" that you may or may not have created yourself. Matrix (talk) 20:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, your interpretation of policy is borderline wikilaywering, plus you are not considering the impact of your interpretation. You are effectively opening the doors to create millions of new Qs based on just a Findagrave and FamilySearch ID. Wikidata is not a genealogy service - we only store people if there is something somewhat notable about them, not just because their birth certificate is on a website. Yes, I am aware the line for notability on Wikidata is low, but it is not this low. By that logic if I upload my birth certificate onto one of these websites am I now magically notable? Matrix (talk) 21:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Wikidata is not a genealogy service", correct! It is a database of databases. To make it into a genealogy service we would have to delete everything that is not instance_of=human, and just keep the 10 million entries on people. "If I upload my birth certificate onto one of these websites am I now magically notable", no! You would be a living person involved in self-promotion, and you would be doxing a living person, even though that living person is yourself. Commons deletes documents on living people that discloses personal information on a regular basis. People need to be "somewhat notable", you are thinking of Wikipedia where people need to be famous. "Wikilaywering", if you mean citing precedents and policy in a cogent fashion, then I would say that is a good thing. --RAN (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you are citing policy, but you are not considering the impacts of your interpretation (hence wikilawyering). I am not thinking of Wikipedia, no. You seem to be attacking everything except my core argument, so I'll condense it for you. Wikidata should not store a person just because they exist, and have a birth certificate or information on one of these genealogy websites. Doing so would mean the millions of people on these genealogy websites are now somehow notable enough to have a Wikidata entry. This is henceforth in no way a "serious" reference. Matrix (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete At least one of these items, William Francis Norton (1857-1939) memoir, isn't referenced to anything. Serious or otherwise. Whereas the others seem to just be referenced to ancestory.com/findagrave.com and I've seen nothing after years of editing entries for people on here to indicate those are good enough on their own. Least of all because both are volunteer created and edited databases that often contain many errors. Nor do I think they are considered "serious" for the purposes of Wikidata anyway. Again, at least not without anything else supporting whatever they being referenced for.
Plus there's a lot of un-referenced "facts" in these entries to begin with. To the point that if said "facts" were to be deleted all that would remain is "so-and-so is a person. Ancestory.com says so." And I just don't think that works per Wikidata:Notability "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." "X is X" isn't a description of anything and a single reference isn't "references." --Adamant1 (talk) 10:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have over 1,000,000 data points without references, if that demands deletion, then they all will need to be deleted, otherwise it is selective enforcement. "Ancestory" [sic] is a strawman argument. For instance, for William Francis Norton, the link to Familysearch is connected to 22 documents, from his baptism in Ireland to his death certificate in 1939 in Manhattan. Wikidata notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." That is 22 "serious and publicly available references". Once again, are you arguing that the 22 references are not serious, or are not public? Argument: "[Findagrave is a] created and edited databases that often contain many errors". That describes Wikipedia and Wikidata, yet Wikipedia had fewer errors than Encyclopedia Britannica. Both VIAF and LCCN use Wikidata despite that it "often contain many errors", and of course each of those authority control databases contain errors. See: Wikidata:WikiProject_Authority_control/LCCN_errors and Wikidata:VIAF/cluster/conflating entities. This is part of a concerted harassment campaign. --RAN (talk) 12:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): To quote from Dorades' comment below "Just adding that Find a Grave memorial ID (P535) and FamilySearch person ID (P2889), that were brought up above, are both Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320)." I'm sure you'll just chalk that up to a "concerted harassment campaign" on the part of whomever originally decided the properties don't imply notability though like you've done with everything else. Clearly everyone on here is just out to get you lmao. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That was a personal project by Pigsonthewing, it doesn't trump: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." Find a Grave memorial ID (P535) and FamilySearch person ID (P2889) are both serious and public. It was never codified into Wikidata:Notability. Find a Grave memorial ID (P535) and FamilySearch (P2889) are both public and serious. If it does get codified into Wikidata:Notability then we have to delete every entry that uses them.
  •  Delete - I don't think it is a good idea to create an item in Wikidata for every person that once lived and for whom a birth certificate or grave yard record can be found in some archive or so. Take Margaret Feeney (Q125973633) with the description: "(1812-1891) wife of William Naughton" and William Norton (Q125973531) with the description: "(1809-1891) husband of Margaret Feeney". What made these people so special? From the descriptions I get the idea the most important part is that they have been married to each other. So what? No Wikimedia project like en-wiki has an article/page about both of them! If we keep items like this we might end up with billions of items about humans that make it extremely difficult to find the item about a person (living or not) that fits better in Wikidata. - Robotje (talk) 12:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikidata notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." This is not Wikipedia and we do not use Wikipedia:Notability where entries on humans need to be "special" or famous. I agree with: "I don't think it is a good idea to create an item in Wikidata for every person that once lived", we should only have entries for people that can be "described using serious and publicly available references". Millions of people existed before "serious and publicly available references" existed. As to "extremely difficult to find the item" Findagrave has 230 million entries on humans, and Familysearch has over 500 million entries on humans, and yet I am able to find the exact person I am looking for in a few nanoseconds. Again, this is part of a concerted harassment campaign, and none of the deletion rationales cite an actual rule that contradicts: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references". --RAN (talk) 13:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah sure, "Findagrave has 230 million entries on humans, and Familysearch has over 500 million entries on humans, and yet I am able to find the exact person I am looking for in a few nanoseconds." The first name I found on your user-page (ignoring the TOC) is John Smith. I just did a search for that name in findagrave.com and they mentioned that 87728 persons were found showing less than 1% of them. The latency for that website, the database search time, the time for your browser to display it, the refresh of your screen, the time for you to read it takes way more then a few nanoseconds. And still you try to convince me that you only need a few nanoseconds to find the right record. It is obvious you are bluffing. You also referred to my explanation as "... part of a concerted harassment campaign ..." What proof do you have that I took part of some kind of joint effort to harass you? Nobody asked or contacted me about this nor did I contact someone about this. Again you are bluffing. - Robotje (talk) 14:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"I don't think it is a good idea ..." (my emphasis added) Your thoughts are not Wikidata policy. None of the entries nominated are for a "John Smith", so there is no worry about finding the correct one. And when I search Findagrave for the John Smith who died in Ireland in 1861 I only find two people. Perhaps for you it will take milliseconds and not nanoseconds. It took me longer to type in the search parameters than to run the search. If you want to lobby for a new rule, where we disallow Wikidata entries for people with common names because it may be difficult to disambiguate them, that would be an interesting idea. I mention "John Smith" on my Wikidata page to show how linking is better at Wikidata than at Wikipedia, Q-number are permanent and Wikipedia entries for people with common names are constantly changing. People identified in images at the Flickr Commons project with common names, no longer point to the proper person as "John Smith (politician)" may become "John Smith (mayor)" and "John Smith (politician)" may become a disambiguation page.----RAN (talk) 14:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just adding that Find a Grave memorial ID (P535) and FamilySearch person ID (P2889), that were brought up above, are both Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320). --Dorades (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That was a personal project by Pigsonthewing, it doesn't trump: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." Find a Grave memorial ID (P535) and FamilySearch person ID (P2889) are both serious and public. It was never codified into Wikidata:Notability. There are over 5,000 entries using only Find a Grave memorial ID (P535) and FamilySearch person ID (P2889). There has been no attempt to delete them all and deleting 5 entries would constitute selective enforcement. --RAN (talk) 22:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Regardless of how many unreferenced entries currently exist I still think that at least things like birth dates where there's a specific warning should be referenced and "well, other people don't reference either. So whatever. I'm being harassed!" is a good excuse. So is there a reason you can't at least use the actual source documents as references instead of either just not referencing the information at all or doing it by way of a private document that no one outside of the family has access to? Otherwise it's kind of like using a Google Search as a reference instead of the actual website where you found the information. Or being like "the reference is a napkin that I wrote the information down on and tossed out afterwards week ago."
  • Absolutely! Selective enforcement of any rule or selective enforcement of any law is harassment, and abuse of power. As you well know, the source document exists, you voted to delete it. It was deleted using the "bad faith" argument, based on a novel rule applied only in this case, that if someone adds a document at Commons and also adds an entry for that document at Wikidata, that represents "bad faith". And the rule will apply only for this particular case, and will not be applied universally. Another example of selective enforcement. --RAN (talk) 13:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The whole point in references is that people can check them for accuracy or whatever and that clearly can't be done here because of how your doing it. 100% those types of entries should entries should be deleted. Or at least the unreferenced information should be cited to something. You can't just say someone was born on a certain date or in a specific place without evidence and say it's cool because other people are doing it to. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • How about you start a thread about deleting all the data that is unreferenced in Wikidata, all >1,000,000 data points, and I will support the outcome. That way you can show it isn't selective enforcement, and you really believe in the cause. And I am sure you already looked at the tombstones and birth, marriage and death records already provided for each person. It seems that whatever I do you are just going to keep moving the goalposts. --RAN (talk) 14:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your doing the same deflecting as on Commons. This doesn't have anything to do with "all unreferenced data points" in Wikidata. I'm not the one who keeps moving the goalposts, you are. Stick to the topic and answer the question. Why not reference the entries for biographical information to the actual documents? Your the claiming they exist and it's where you got the data from. Your also the one who keeps citing "The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." You can't have it both ways where the entries need to be described "using publicly available references" and then just whine that you don't have to do it that way because other people aren't. Especially since your the one who's repeatedly bringing the guideline up to begin with. It's your standard! --Adamant1 (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which of the >1,000,000 data points that do not have references are you challenging as incorrect? Please be specific. You keep bringing up that data is unreferenced and needs to be deleted, but have not said which data point you are challenging as incorrect. --RAN (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, your just deflecting. Your the one who repeatedly cited the notability requirements that say "the entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." So what exactly are the "publicly available references" your claiming make the entries you created notable and why haven't you added the references to them? --Adamant1 (talk) 05:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now for the third time, which data point/points are you challenging? You keep shouting the same thing, but have not provided an answer, you just keep shouting "references" without any context or providing an example where a reference is missing or the data provided by a reference is incorrect. Then when I show that "publicly available references" are there, you move the goalpost to "serious", again without specifying a data point where the reference is not "serious". Then the cycle begins again. --RAN (talk) 17:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Take Margaret Feeney (Q125973633) with the description: "(1812-1891) wife of William Naughton" and William Norton (Q125973531) with the description: "(1809-1891) husband of Margaret Feeney". What made these people so special? From the descriptions I get the idea the most important part is that they have been married to each other. What serious source do you think was used? Who wrote that source and when and where was it published? Was the source a neutral source? If you have convincing answers for these questions I will certainly reconsider my 'vote' for deletion. - Robotje (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You wrote: "What serious source do you think was used?" The sources are all provided. Which of the 9 documents at Familysearch do think is incorrect, or biased, or not serious, which are you challenging as containing errors? Her marriage and death records come from the State of Massachusetts. Do you think that the information on her tombstone was deliberately incorrect because the person that provided it was biased or not a "neutral source"? You wrote: "What made these people so special?" Being "special" or famous is the realm of Wikipedia not Wikidata. Wikidata is just an authority control database with information from other databases, that are "serious and publicly available". The argument that Wikidata should follow Wikipedia notability rules or only contain entries for people with Wikipedia entries has been rejected many times. --RAN (talk) 18:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • My summary We have four arguments for deletion but none of them cite a specific policy from Wikidata:Notability that is contravened. One argument is "What made these people so special?" but we do not require people to be "special" or entries have "actual uses", that is why we have Wikipedia. Another argument was the "John Smith" argument, that if we have too many entries, people will not be able to find the one they are looking for. We can't read minds or foretell the future to know which "John Smith" anyone will be looking for. If you are looking for a famous "John Smith" search in Wikipedia. Findagrave has 230 million entries on humans, and Familysearch has over 500 million entries on humans, all easy to search for. Another argument was that the references were not "serious", but the references were chosen by Wikidata to be Identifiers because they are "serious and public". --RAN (talk) 00:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's also the argument that the entries aren't "described using serious and publicly available references", which you seem to be ignoring even though your the one who's cited that exact guideline multiple times. Well, at least not outside of wikilaywyering by citing other stuff. But still. You can't just selectively bring up a guideline to support your argument and then ignore it when it doesn't. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per others above, Find a Grave memorial ID (P535) and FamilySearch person ID (P2889) are Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320). Yes, they are identifiers, but they do not imply notability. The idea that these identifiers were chosen by Wikidata's community to be identifiers merely because they were "serious" references and imply notability is wrong - for example, YouTube channel ID (P2397) exists as an identifier, but merely having a YouTube channel ID doesn't imply notability. The purpose of an identifier is to identify the subject, not to create notability out of thin air. Matrix (talk) 16:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • These two arguments contradict each other. One says we need to have "publicly available references" (like Findagrave and Familysearch). The other says we can't have Findagrave and Familysearch because they appear in a list called "not imply notability" and somehow that trumps Wikidata:Notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." There is no proviso in Wikidata:Notability that mentions the "not imply notability" list. If you want to change the terms and wording of Wikidata:Notability, you have to lobby for the changes. --RAN (talk) 20:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): What do you think the word "serious" in the guideline implies? Because you seem to be leaving that part of it out of the equation. Its also why a source like YouTube doesn't go towards notability even though its "publicly available." So how are Findagrave or familysearch "serious references" or anymore so then YouTube (which I assume you agree doesn't infer notability)? --Adamant1 (talk) 15:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A serious source, rather than a "satirical" source, like The Onion (Q618236), that deliberately provides fake news for entertainment. See: w:List of satirical news websites. YouTube is a straw man argument (Q912820), none of the entries use YouTube as a reference for any of the data provided. --RAN (talk) 17:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
YouTube is a straw man argument (Q912820) Not any more or less then you citing other unsourced entries as an excuse for why these one's shouldn't be deleted. I think it's relevant though because it and websites like findagrave.com both contain user generated content. Which at least IMO is why they wouldn't qualify as "serious references." Or to put it another way, a website created by users who and don't have an established process of fact checking just isn't an earnest reference for factual information.
That's also why I've asked several times now why you don't just reference the original documents that supposedly contain the information. I'd be perfectly fine with you using say the United States Census over just a link to a Findagrave page that doesn't say were the birth and death information even came from to begin with. I'd consider that a serious source compared to there being essentially none with Findagrave. I don't know how many times I've requested a picture of a gravestone on there and it turned out the original birth or death dates were wrong. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124835476

[edit]

Andres Focil (Q124835476): Entrepreneur & Technologist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Its been abused --Warripikin0 (talk) 21:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Looks like it's been vandalised a fair bit, but clearly notable as the founder of WMT Digital (Q123677457) Piecesofuk (talk) 10:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request

[edit]
Extended content
  1. Q53925659 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q53928008 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q54278610 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q54762338 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q62662230 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q62648172 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q59910275 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q66818167 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q55229956 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q125417211 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q124358328 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q124364549 (delete | history | links | logs)
  13. Q123570535 (delete | history | links | logs)
  14. Q123570398 (delete | history | links | logs)
  15. Q118923879 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)
  16. Q120000704 (delete | history | links | logs)
  17. Q118179203 (delete | history | links | logs)
  18. Q117841850 (delete | history | links | logs)

Spam from a banned user Benoît Prieur. Books not used on the Wiki projects Durifon (talk) 08:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pygame - Iníciese en el desarrollo de video juegos en Python (Q120000704) is a published book, so probably notable. Actually, it's more how we consider ENI editions (Q53343983) as a reliable editing house. Fralambert (talk) 02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some may be borderline (eg. Q62662230) but most seems notable enough for Wikidata. @Fralambert: I don't see a problem ENI editions (Q53343983) ; I'm more concerned about Kindle Direct Publishing (Q15823534). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Books published at ENI éditions should not be deleted IMO. Thibaut (talk) 09:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So I would mark WPF : développez des applications structurées (MVVM, XAML...) (Q53925659), WPF : développez des applications structurées (MVVM, XAML...) (Q54278610), Programmation en C# : préparation aux certifications MCSA - Examen 70-483 (Q54762338), Informatique quantique : de la physique quantique à la programmation quantique en Q# (Q59910275), Pygame - Initiez-vous au développement de jeux vidéo en Python (Q66818167), Q124364549 and Pygame - Iníciese en el desarrollo de video juegos en Python (Q120000704) as notable since they are published by ENI. Fralambert (talk) 11:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111609221

[edit]

Davie Fogarty (Q111609221): Australian entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional, not notable. Articles were deleted on the English and German Wikipedia due to a lack of notability. IDs are social media accounts, the only reference is "FamousBirthdays", a notoriously unreliable spam page. A Commons category exists for now, but the images in it are nominated for deletion. So it should be gone soon. --95.91.226.3 15:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Notable entrepreneur: he's currently one of the "Sharks" on the Australian version of Dragon's Den https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shark_Tank_(Australian_TV_series) https://www.paramountanz.com.au/news-and-insights/lets-get-down-to-business-meet-the-five-new-sharks/ and the founder of the Oodie https://www.9news.com.au/national/oodie-founder-how-26-year-old-aussie-created-a-200-million-business-idea/8d36a5f4-b0a0-4282-ba1a-f39fb2bd180e Piecesofuk (talk) 16:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q112259721

[edit]

Reza Torkzadeh (Q112259721): author and lawyer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Failed notability referenced, lost all links on Wikimedia sites. Lemonaka (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did write a book published by Lioncrest Publishing (Q125781254). [2]. Fralambert (talk) 16:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion from The Peerage

[edit]
  1. Q76189137 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q76189140 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q76189141 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q76189142 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q76189144 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Members of the same Ryan/Leahy family (linked to each others); all data is coming from The Peerage but the pages have been deleted from the source and the IDs have been reassigned. VIGNERON (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--VIGNERON (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It looks like something went wrong in the linking at The Peerage, we have two men married in the 1800s. I suspect that it was too difficult to untangle and The Peerage just deleted the people. I will try and fix the errors and supply identifiers for Familysearch and Findagrave. If I run into the same problem, that it is too difficult to untangle, I will change to delete for some of the people. --RAN (talk) 18:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )! (I did have a quick search but didn't found other sources, thanks a lot for finding them). I withdraw my request for these items but I still wonder if we should delete Margaret Ryan (Q76189137), you repurposed it but it feels very wrong (ironically, it's the exactly what The Peerage did that cause the problem that we want to avoid). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • When I looked at the tree in Ancestry and Familysearch and in the Australian birth and death index, all the information that had been "Thomas" was actually for "Margaret", there already was an entry for "Thomas" in Wikidata, he was listed as a child twice. We maintain a large list of Wikidata:WikiProject Authority control/The Peerage errors. It looks like these entries were created as part of a The Peerage project on the pioneer families of Australia. I can see why The Peerage gave up, it would have been easier to just delete and start over at some future time, it took me several hours to fix. It is a shame that Australia does not preserve their censuses, after collating the data, they destroy the originals with all the family information. The England census fully preserved goes back to 1841 and the first USA census to name all family members was in 1850 and is fully preserved. --RAN (talk) 16:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q119142323

[edit]

WHITE ALBUM2 (Q119142323): adult game developed by Leaf: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WHITE ALBUM2 is the name of the game series, see Q5960516 --Rainsday (talk) 01:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q126022120

[edit]

Twitter (Q126022120): American social networking service (2006–2023): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

applicable in X (Q918) 2A03:1B20:1:E011:0:0:0:A22E 10:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Have sitelink. Also enwiki have two different articles. Fralambert (talk) 19:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fralambert: the enwiki links are a result of a cut and paste move. but still  Keep since jawiki has 2 articles. Queen of Hearts (talk) 04:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q126285224

[edit]

Ruth Alster (Q126285224): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

User requested to delete. Shani Evenstein (talk) 19:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are not @Ruti-WMIL. Fralambert (talk) 19:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125696180

[edit]

Joint Statement on Palestine (Q125696180): Joint statement by Wikimedia organizations and individuals regarding the ongoing situation in Palestine, 7 April 2024: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q107463053

[edit]

Xabier Armendaritz (Q107463053): basque translator and wikipedian: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 20:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q112633731

[edit]

WinCommerce (Q112633731): Vietnamese consumer goods and retail company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 04:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124624249

[edit]

Alipas (Q124624249): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111086347

[edit]

ITD Vietnam (Q111086347): Coaching & Training center in Vietnam: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111077196

[edit]

Vincere (Q111077196): Software as a service: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111077449

[edit]

ITD World (Q111077449): Coaching & Training center in Malaysia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111043023

[edit]

Aeon (Vietnam) (Q111043023): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q16480515

[edit]

Q16480515: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q116149665

[edit]

Pierce Visual Works Vina (Q116149665): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q108440424

[edit]

Hưng Thịnh (Q108440424): Vietnamese conglomerate: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q105536146

[edit]

TopCV (Q105536146): TopCV Vietnam Joint Stock Company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q105536595

[edit]

Tran Trung Hieu (Q105536595): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111086413

[edit]

Masterise Homes (Q111086413): Vietnamese real estate developer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111261117

[edit]

Q111261117: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111086270

[edit]

Novaland Property (Q111086270): Website about Novaland real estate project: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111034327

[edit]

Celadon City (Q111034327): Neighborhood in Tan Phu district, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A 82 hectares neighbourhood is a large enough urban feature to be sure that it is notable. Additionally, it seems to have been covered by reliable sources: https://www.vietnam.vn/en/nhieu-khach-hang-cua-celadon-city-da-tien-hanh-khoi-kien-chu-dau-tu-gamuda-land/ Pere prlpz (talk) 20:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q65116775

[edit]

Hoa Phat (Q65116775): Vietnamese-American cargo and money transfer company; first money transfer service between the United States and Vietnam: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. NewUniverse (talk) 09:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Meets notability criteria 2 and 3. Minh Nguyễn 💬 13:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Question no comment on #2 for now, but how do you believe that a structural need is met? The link mentioned by the bot is a different from (P1889) statement which is IMHO not needed if the item itself is not notable, and should normally not be used to establish notability on it's own, in my opinion. KonstantinaG07 (talk) 11:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I didn’t look too closely at the inbound link. It is a bit of a stretch, but not unreasonable given the potential confusion over diacritics. I agree that it wouldn’t matter for notability in this case. Regardless, I think this business would even meet the more rigorous standard of w:WP:SIGCOV, which is beyond what Wikidata requires. Minh Nguyễn 💬 13:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123631791

[edit]

Save the Children,Uganda (Q123631791): not-for-profit organization in Uganda: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122182842

[edit]

Ssebuyungo Christopher (Q122182842): Ugandan conservator and archaelogist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 20:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122182840

[edit]

Anne Jepkemboi (Q122182840): Ugandan political scientist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122187687

[edit]

Madina Nabukeera (Q122187687): Ugandan political scientist and educator: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125291418

[edit]

Roja Lazey (Q125291418): South African musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable, self promo --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q126368034

[edit]

Nathan Probst (Q126368034): Filmmaker from Zurich: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person Belbury (talk) 12:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125972746

[edit]

Q125972746: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Closed student campus --WKPDA3 (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125374744

[edit]

Avinash Walton (Q125374744): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty and spam (deletion request on dagWP and hiWP) Eihel (talk) 19:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122182834

[edit]

James Wilson Magezi (Q122182834): Ugandan political scientist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 20:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122183249

[edit]

Nathan Sewanyana Ssenkomago (Q122183249): Ugandan political scientist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122183248

[edit]

Filda Lanyero Ojok (Q122183248): Ugandan political scientist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122182839

[edit]

Sauda Nabukenya (Q122182839): Uganda political scientist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122182176

[edit]

Cyprian Ben Adupa (Q122182176): Ugandan academic: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124767990

[edit]

list of geospatial data sources (Q124767990): type of list containing geospatial data sources: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Arbitrary list Quesotiotyo (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment To clarify, it isn't a specific list, but a class of lists. Could have structural use. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 00:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I should have made that distinction, thank you for pointing it out. --Quesotiotyo (talk) 17:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Neologism, over specific. could be modeled in items without a new subclass, i.e. instance of list with main subject. William Graham (talk) 04:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q120372630

[edit]

Category:Results announced (Q120372630): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item for the created, then nominated for deletion as unused, by me en-wiki category. --Flipping Switches (talk) 00:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q12725820

[edit]

Costica Radulescu (Q12725820): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. Valentin JJ. (talk) 10:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q112077479

[edit]

Q112077479: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The disambiguation page became a redirect page --Virant (talk) 10:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q3796928

[edit]

government employee (Q3796928): employee who works for a state: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Дублікат Q212238 (державний службовець). --MMH (talk) 11:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125958076

[edit]

ColdTreap (Q125958076): Music artist, blogger and sound producer.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable IMO --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q114903175

[edit]

SkoOlet’ OS (Q114903175): fictional character from the BoOzy’ OS franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, look down. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (106-115)

[edit]
  1. Q115727563 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q115727720 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q115727864 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q125552783 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q115346342 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q114903340 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q124804642 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q124804058 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q124803496 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q125411281 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Items for deleted Commons categories (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:46, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I warned @REDƎYE. Commons Category are not notable by WD:N. Fralambert (talk) 12:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Smilod’ OS (Q115727563), MammoOth’ OS (Q115727720) and Marie-L’ OS (Q115727864) are characters. I will look later if they are notable or not. Fralambert (talk) 02:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q114366970

[edit]

OSmic the Hedgeh’ OS (Q114366970): fictional video game in BoOzy’ OS and the Cristal Gem: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item for deleted Commons gallery (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. Look up. Look down. It's all interconnected. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q126173021

[edit]

Orin Wulandari (Q126173021): Indonesian badminton player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Was already once deleted, tried to gain importance by creating an Indonesian article - also there deleted [3] --Florentyna (talk) 15:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q87072640

[edit]

Aude Sedjar (Q87072640): French actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not Wikidata:Notability. Created as part of the massive cross-wiki spam effort that spawned all of these (scroll down) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q113995136

[edit]

Rob’ OSmic (Q113995136): fictional character from the BoOzy’ OS franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The Wikidata item doesn't start with Category, but it was created to hook into commons:Category:Rob' OSmic, which I've just deleted. It serves no other purpose, as it's part of a massive crosswiki spam effort. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q126453266

[edit]

Q126453266: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q126431471 Abazizfahad (talk) 10:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q113456232

[edit]

Shaibu Abu (Q113456232): Islamic scholar and Imam: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q112846760

[edit]

Tracy L. Porter (Q112846760): Executive Vice President of Commercial Metals Company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Notable: passes at least WDN3 as he is listed as the chief operating officer (P1789) of Commercial Metals Company (Q5152510) on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_Metals_Company Piecesofuk (talk) 15:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111747316

[edit]

Josephine Ohene Boateng (Q111747316): a Ghanaian politician ( District chief executive): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111747096

[edit]

Hajia Amama Ayibu (Q111747096): a Ghanaian politician ( District chief executive): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110895487

[edit]

Victoria Adu (Q110895487): a Ghanaian politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110895492

[edit]

Asare Danso (Q110895492): a Ghanaian politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110895478

[edit]

Kwabena Panin Nkansah (Q110895478): a Ghanaian politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110895477

[edit]

Seth Asante (Q110895477): Ghanaian politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110878768

[edit]

Raymond Nana Damptey (Q110878768): a Ghanaian politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110877089

[edit]

Alex Incoom (Q110877089): a Ghanaian politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:59, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110835013

[edit]

Issac Kwadzo Buabeng (Q110835013): Ghanaian Politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110832599

[edit]

Katherine T. Lankono (Q110832599): a Ghanaian politician(District Chief Executive): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Local politicians should be notable. Probably https://dag.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine_Lankono Piecesofuk (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110830391

[edit]

Prosper Paty Kofi (Q110830391): Politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Local politicians should be notable, he's described as District Chief Executive in https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akatsi_North_District Piecesofuk (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We decide notability on either sources used in the item, sitelinks or items using this item, neither were present on the moment of nomination. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding of notability is that if a named entity is stored in a Wikipedia article then it should be notable for Wikidata, see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Help:About_data#Where_is_structure? "Instead of supporting the structure and common elements of a web page, Wikidata provides structure for all the information stored in Wikipedia, and on the other Wikimedia projects." Piecesofuk (talk) 16:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The linked page is not a guideline, Wikidata:Notability is. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a help page describing the purpose of Wikidata.
I expect they all pass WDN2: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." eg https://gna.org.gh/2021/09/president-akufo-addo-re-nominates-seven-mdces-for-volta-region/ Piecesofuk (talk) 16:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (606-615)

[edit]
  1. Q125360220 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q125359701 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q125261823 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q125361300 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q125261873 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q125503930 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q125503732 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q125503533 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q125503563 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q125504556 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q114417027

[edit]

Cristal Gem Zone (Q114417027): first level in OSmic the Hedgeh’ OS: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable subsection of non-notable media production. All of the 45 links are either already listed for deletion on this page or will be shortly. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (616-625)

[edit]
  1. Q115180678 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q114453378 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q124285170 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q125636515 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q113963799 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q124324140 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q114368777 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q114369128 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q124373318 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q124323995 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (626-635)

[edit]
  1. Q124656073 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q124652859 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q124656100 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q124655984 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q124655842 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q124652741 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q125361094 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q124832842 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q124727756 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q124727844 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (636-645)

[edit]
  1. Q124727628 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q124719108 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q124718897 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q124719126 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q124718868 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q124718842 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q124718953 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q124718985 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q124718916 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q124718835 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (646-655)

[edit]
  1. Q125536693 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q125577660 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q125171963 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q125522231 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q125172248 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q114454372 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q114851290 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q114346163 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q124656216 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q124652904 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (656-665)

[edit]
  1. Q124285229 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q124285250 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q124285210 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q125360478 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q115179807 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q115405204 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q114791030 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q124891621 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q114453788 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q126008653 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124805432

[edit]

Category:BoOzy’ OS and the Cristal Gem characters by type (Q124805432): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125636351

[edit]

Category:Characters created by J.K. Arsyn by name (Q125636351): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125538885

[edit]

Category:BoOzy’ OS and the Cristal Gem by subject (Q125538885): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q114558090

[edit]

Category:BoOzy’ OS and the Cristal Gem characters (Q114558090): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (671-680)

[edit]
  1. Q124890445 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q125636449 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q125636562 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q114369601 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q115960031 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q125109270 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q125577463 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q124363275 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q124363356 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q124363706 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (681-690)

[edit]
  1. Q125168584 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q124363148 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q115655890 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q115655778 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q115180757 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q115706410 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q115155295 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q125540290 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q125540069 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q125540479 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (691-700)

[edit]
  1. Q125937230 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q125018920 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q116045192 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q116045242 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q116045768 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q116124786 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q116008344 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q116045936 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q116046018 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q115605368 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (701-710)

[edit]
  1. Q115679738 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q115954031 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q115955331 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q115955299 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q125017095 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q116008357 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q116008027 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q116008010 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q116007965 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q116008303 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (711-720)

[edit]
  1. Q124422505 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q124422046 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q124421981 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q116045595 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q116045977 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q116126400 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q116045887 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q125420861 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q124376134 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q115564084 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (721-730)

[edit]
  1. Q115492758 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q125537888 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q125537855 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q115399441 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q116007929 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q124536467 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q116008257 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q116008432 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q116008330 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q116008469 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q89125201

[edit]

Q89125201: 2017 short film: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails Wikidata:Notability The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q126162490

[edit]

Cristal 111 (Q126162490): 2024 animated short film: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails Wikidata:Notability The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (731-740)

[edit]
  1. Q126113283 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q126113355 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q114904322 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q115533715 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q115927169 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q115533770 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q115654999 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q115534848 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q115533876 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q115654973 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Empty Commons categories created by REDƎYE (741-750)

[edit]
  1. Q115679881 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q115533698 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q116044970 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q116008225 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q116045045 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q116008366 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q124376050 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q125420913 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q125461860 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q124375974 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Item for deleted Commons category (empty) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions&oldid=2175436942"